• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump signs order prioritizing job skills over college degree in government hiring

So you're neither a corporate hiring manager nor a college graduate. No experience in those areas. Lots of opinions.
What qualifications do you have for your opinions, and which are necessary?
 
Sounds like a good idea. Help people avoid crushing college loan debt by having jobs that require experience and not just a degree. Cool.
 
Small fine but i can guarandamntee many more people would be if der trumpengroper didnt make a huge fuss about it.
You feel that the American culture is the same as the South Korean culture and that the American people would be okay with the federally funded mask police? Sure.
 
In fact it is higher learning that has been dumbed down. https://www.amazon.com/Breakdown-Higher-Education-Happened-Damage/dp/1641770880
 
You feel that the American culture is the same as the South Korean culture and that the American people would be okay with the federally funded mask police? Sure.

:lamo culture is irrelevant. Police just distributed masks to help people, hardly heavy handed compared to our police. Suppose you have a point though, US police is worse. I suggested learning from more successful countries.
 

Don't disagree for jobs you described.

I would expect college education to be a positive in natural resource management, the effects of toxic spills on wildlife, fire impact on soils, etc.
 
Perhaps other qualifications apart from a college degree is desirable. Lois Lerner Takes the Fifth at Tax Hearing

I should have been more clear. I worked for one of the federal land management agencies in natural resource / fire work. My comments are more about the natural resource agencies.
Yes, there are jobs where no college education is required. Yes, there are some that a college education would highly beneficial.
 
Don't disagree for jobs you described.

I would expect college education to be a positive in natural resource management, the effects of toxic spills on wildlife, fire impact on soils, etc.

cool so show us where that still wouldn't occur.
 
If the bill prioritizes those things, how can the bold be true????

 
cool so show us where that still wouldn't occur.

All depends how OPM takes Trumps EO to make changes to the classification series. If OPM leaves the more professional series alone, it won't be a problem.

Since Trump's EO has not been implemented yet, can't do it. :lamo
 
Your talking the liberal arts area. I don't see it in the Natural Science fields. (Forestry, Wildland Fire, Range, Soils, Wildlife, etc).

Exactly. Data is data. Cause and effect. Systems and natural processes.

 
You've just got to hand it to President of the United States of America Donald Trump. He wants to prioritize job experience for federal hires, and has busily stocked the swamp with appointees sadly lacking in same so that he can get rid of them and claim victory!

What a man! MAGA!

Sent from my old PC, using a cheap keyboard.
 
If the bill prioritizes those things, how can the bold be true????

We won't know exactly how the new classifications prioritize what, until the precise modifications come out. But it opens the door for such abuses. What we do know is that it significantly reduces the scope and requirements of objective classifications that were previously put in place for years. Same could be said for experience. At best, we had some anecdotal comments made from industry execs that publicly spoke with Trump about the new classifications, one raved about how a long time truck driver who lost his job was able to get a new career after just a year of online programming. If that example is any illustration, I don't really see how 'years' of relevant experience would supercede and replace a qualified degree with this new system. How do we know that this experience based criteria can objectively field candidates any better than an education based criteria? One thing about an accredited college education is you can pretty much believe that candidates from that pool have a pretty objective and rigorous vetting before they even get put in a position.

I really can't understand all the whining from those on here that argue that they employ college idiots. I can only imagine that they never hired from accredited colleges (maybe Trump university, which wouldn't qualify), and never took the time to interview college graduates before hiring, or were not qualified to interview to begin with. Of the hundreds of candidates I've interviewed, very few hires could not perform competently on the job.

All these new college graduates who worked hard for years and likely gambled their entire future on the promise of hard work pays off, are being marginalized by the Trump admin. Sadly, Trump is doing everything he can to minimize their chances, right as we are facing the biggest unemployment crisis in history. And there's a history of Trump administration hiring people that made up college educations (like mina chang) and got put in high paying jobs. This just makes those types of hires, easier to slip through the cracks. There's not a lot to suggest he really cares about improving objective hiring standards or improving quality of living wages, but I can see how it sounds good on the surface (like lots of his specious statements).
 
Last edited:
Right Wingers don't value education. I'd say that is the most obvious thing ever.

Right Wingers believe that everyone is equal.

We're not fans of buying your way from caste to caste by memorizing BS spewed out by liberal professors, and then using your degree to act like you're on a different level than everyone else

Liberals are obsessed with working their way up the social ladder, because they have no other goals in life - it comes with atheism, and lack of a romantic interest in anybody or anything
 

Agreed on both parts, I think some jobs do need a degree but there are also some that you just need the knowledge and if that's through work experience instead of school (or through a trade school) that's fine. I'd even say some cases work experience trumps college for the knowledge needed. I also agree in the disappointment that liberal minded posts seem to be so against this idea.

Then again me being liberal yet disagreeing with liberals is becoming pretty common these days =/.

FYI, if you are getting a liberal arts degree, you don't even need to take 1 math class.

When I studied for a business degree, all I had to take was a statistics class, which makes sense but yeah.
 

Aren't the skill necessary to do the job the most important thing? And this isn't a slap in the face to college graduates. I'm sure they learned the necessary skills at college.
 
Aren't the skill necessary to do the job the most important thing? And this isn't a slap in the face to college graduates. I'm sure they learned the necessary skills at college.

IF you graduated from Harvard or Yale, they probably will hire you despite not having the necessary skills
 
Would Columbia qualify as one of the better universities? YouTube

Or Berkeley? YouTube
 

If the bill prioritizes those things, how can the bold be true????
We won't know exactly how the new classifications prioritize what, until the precise modifications come out.

Let's just stick with answering my question first. You made a definite statement...and then responded...'we wont know...' What was the basis for your statement?

 
So you're neither a corporate hiring manager nor a college graduate. No experience in those areas. Lots of opinions.

So you're just going to police the thread and say that people aren't things?

So you're turning in with pointless drivel because you can't formulate an argument?

thanks for letting me know I guess there's nothing left to talk to you about.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…