- Joined
- Jan 22, 2017
- Messages
- 5,774
- Reaction score
- 4,395
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Fortune is accurate, the others you mention are not.Not intentionally, I'm sure. The quote from Fortune indicates that the $500 Billion is the expected value of products Nvidia will sell. Other comments about it indicate that it is an "investment" or a commitment of some kind.
Again there is no half a trillion dollars investment. They are just expecting to sell that much stuff.Without further investigation, I'm content to agree that Nvidia is going to spend money to create new products and in general add to the economy to the extent of half a trillion dollars.
Nonsense comment about Democrats. The CHIPS act allows for shared government/private investment in new/expanded/modernized facilities through government grants. That’s actual investment.I specifically did not use the term, "Cost of Goods Sold" because I know it's place in accounting.
No, it's government spending, just as Democrats refer to any controversial government spending as "an investment."
Yes, that’s correct!Tax avoidance in a bill is an estimate, dependent on the private revenue gained.
Again you are confused and uninformed. Yes, AI companies will invest in equipment. Formerly, those AI companies were purchasing semiconductor equipment made abroad. Now semiconductor companies are building here because of grants and loans made available under the chips act according to the Semiconductor Industry Association:The $450 billion is not necessarily the result of any government impetus. AI is an emerging technology and corporations that are in that field of business are practically required to invest in it.
For decades, the United States was producing a diminishing share of the world’s chips.
But two years ago, leaders in Washington took bipartisan action to address this vulnerability by enacting the CHIPS Act to spark greater U.S.-based semiconductor production and innovation through $52 billion in manufacturing incentives and research investments. CHIPS was a bold, bipartisan bet that by making the U.S. a more cost-competitive location for chip fabrication and research, America could turn the tide of recent history and attract more semiconductor projects to strengthen our economy, national security, and supply chains.
So far, that bet is paying off and beginning to deliver a huge return on investment. Companies in the semiconductor ecosystem have announced more than 80 new projects across 25 U.S. states—totaling nearly $450 billion in private investments—since CHIPS was first introduced in 2020. These projects are expected to create more than 56,000 direct jobs and support hundreds of thousands of additional jobs throughout the U.S. economy.
The report also forecasts the U.S. will grow its share of advanced chip manufacturing to 28% of global capacity by 2032 and capture the same percentage of total global capital expenditures (capex) from 2024-2032—both massive improvements over the current landscape. In the absence of the CHIPS Act, the report estimates the U.S. would have captured only 9% of global capex by 2032.
Wrong. As long as the tariffs exist (which they do now) the effects will be there. The fact that they are being levied now is detrimental and are having the effect I described.Yes, that's the useful, political line. However, the tariffs Trump has imposed have been delayed, altered or cancelled as part of the negotiations over trade in general. Until tariffs on both sides are firm, they don't have any of the effects you list.
For companies deciding where to make investments they have no idea what to do. It is mass chaos. They have no idea what tariffs will be and how long they will last.For companies deciding where to make investments, however, and along with tax reductions, they show a willingness to provide incentives to manufacture in this country.
The only thing people know for sure with tariffs is that stuff will cost the American consumer more money.
With CHIPS companies know what they are getting and how long it will last.
With no evidence other than Trump told me so you disagree with the Federal Reserve Board’s study. No wonder people call it the cult of Trump.We disagree.
Last edited: