• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Seeks Tax Hike on Wealthy Earning $2.5 Million or More

It would be so amusing if Trump undercut Democrats and hiked taxes on the rich to pay for tax cuts for the middle class.

Perhaps if Demcorats weren't such flaming idiots they would get back to their roots of being for the working man and actually do something useful for the middle class on taxes. Instead they'll focus all their energy on letting hairy 40 year old men into the women's bathroom and telling little Johnny he's actually Sarah.
There are already tax cuts for low earners in the plan as there has been since Trump's first term.
 
It would be so amusing if Trump undercut Democrats and hiked taxes on the rich to pay for tax cuts for the middle class.

Perhaps if Demcorats weren't such flaming idiots they would get back to their roots of being for the working man and actually do something useful for the middle class on taxes. Instead they'll focus all their energy on letting hairy 40 year old men into the women's bathroom and telling little Johnny he's actually Sarah.

The messaging from this administration continues to be completely incoherent.
 
I'm a former Democrat so I still have some dumbass in me and progressive taxes are something I still support.


I always thought the richer your are the more benefits from society you get so your burden should be increased. A not very good example would be if you or me went to our local congressman and asked for road repairs to our neighborhood vs Elon Musk playing golf with a senator and explaining how a new road to his factory would benefit the entire area.
Do the wealthy get rich because of the goverment or despite of the goverment?
 
I'm a former Democrat so I still have some dumbass in me and progressive taxes are something I still support.

Well that's something you need to work on. Progressive taxation punishes success, and success is not something which should be punished.

I always thought the richer your are the more benefits from society you get so your burden should be increased.

It depends on how they earn their income. People who are genuinely productive - those creating value, innovating, or building businesses - already contribute enormously to society. If you really want to maximize societal benefit, don’t tax them - leave the money in their hands. It’s far more useful there than in the hands of some idiot politician who’ll blow it on nonsense. If you believe in efficient capital allocation, Mr. Superproductive beats a geriatric politician who can barely use email any day of the week, month, or year.
 
Cool. Tax those guys!
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpn
Do the wealthy get rich because of the goverment or despite of the goverment?
Because the government protects their property rights. Otherwise those stronger and meaner would take it away. That is why people should be taxed a percentage of their wealth.
 
Because the government protects their property rights. Otherwise those stronger and meaner would take it away. That is why people should be taxed a percentage of their wealth.
It works both ways. Rich people can be sued and fined so they have to act responsibly. Poor people have nothing, they cannot be sued. Fining them is useless too. They can act anyway they want. The whole costly judicial system is to control the people who can't or won't act responsible.
 
I'm a former Democrat so I still have some dumbass in me and progressive taxes are something I still support.
You'd better get that dumbass out of you. Did you allow it? Does it hurt?
 
It works both ways. Rich people can be sued and fined so they have to act responsibly. Poor people have nothing, they cannot be sued. Fining them is useless too. They can act anyway they want. The whole costly judicial system is to control the people who can't or won't act responsible.
That is why welfare is required or they would revolt. The rule of law, defense spending, infrastructure, etc., all benefit those with wealth in direct proportion to their wealth.
 
It would be so amusing if Trump undercut Democrats and hiked taxes on the rich to pay for tax cuts for the middle class.

Perhaps if Demcorats weren't such flaming idiots they would get back to their roots of being for the working man and actually do something useful for the middle class on taxes. Instead they'll focus all their energy on letting hairy 40 year old men into the women's bathroom and telling little Johnny he's actually Sarah.
There is a scheme involved. Traitor Trump never does anything for others unless there’s a much bigger benefit in it for him.
 
I would support a tax increase on that bracket.
 
There is a scheme involved. Traitor Trump never does anything for others unless there’s a much bigger benefit in it for him.


Yes, it must be that double reverse whirlwind psychology.
 
MAGAts can wish in one hand …


Does it cause you real physical pain that Trump might be the one who taxes the rich and gives to the middle class instead of your beloved liberals?
 
If he's doing something you want, then what difference does it make.
Because he is more likely to get this made into law if it’s actually part of a PLAN than if it’s a passing brain fart.

Does the legislative process have to be explained to you?

Shoot he seems to believe in tariffs, but flip flops on that weekly.

And remember there’s a ban on Tik Tom (that he favored) that he’s not enforcing.

I’ll believe in a tax increase on the rich when he puts his gaudy signature on it.

Until then it’s all PR hype from our PT Barnum POTUS.
 
It would be so amusing if Trump undercut Democrats and hiked taxes on the rich to pay for tax cuts for the middle class.
Do that and forgo the savage cuts to Medicaid and nutrition programs and this legislation won’t be so bad. But we know they won’t actually do that.
 
It would be so amusing if Trump undercut Democrats and hiked taxes on the rich to pay for tax cuts for the middle class.

Perhaps if Demcorats weren't such flaming idiots they would get back to their roots of being for the working man and actually do something useful for the middle class on taxes. Instead they'll focus all their energy on letting hairy 40 year old men into the women's bathroom and telling little Johnny he's actually Sarah.
Trump is an opportunist. He sees just how bad his and the proposed GOP policies are. They're going over with the American people like a lead balloon.

A tax increase on the wealthy is what we've always wanted within reason. This has very little chance of going anywhere. GOP congress critters aren't going for this one. It's against their DNA.
 
Come'on Chomsky, do you really believe that?


When in our lifetimes have Republicans ever capitulated on raising taxes on the rich?
Will he keep SNAP and Medicaid in place (no cuts) if he gets this increase through?
 
There is a scheme involved. Traitor Trump never does anything for others unless there’s a much bigger benefit in it for him.
He's not worried. Him and his family have made an estimated $2 billion dollars on Crypto and other various bribes and payoffs in just over 100 days. In violation of the emoluments clause and just about every other ethics norm that exists, the Trumps are making themselves ultra rich off the WH.

Trump has mastered the 'Art of Corruption' and is doing it out in the open with no effective resistance.
 
An insurrectionist Obama Judge will block it.

The DP left will melt down that it's unconstitutional to raise taxes on the rich.

I can see it. It's been the trend for both parties for the last 10 years.
 
Back
Top Bottom