- Joined
- Nov 20, 2013
- Messages
- 65,547
- Reaction score
- 49,607
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Mulvaney mentioned Camp David a number of times in response to questions. The video below, at 7:49 is the first time. He was responding to a question about "the perfect place". From what he said...and none of the reporters disputed him...it was a "miserable" place to hold that kind of event.
To be fair and honest, there's an entire nation of venues to choose from, for one, and it's been stated that the event would be during the middle of hurricane season, for another.
Can you imagine if in the middle of the G7 summit, there's a hurricane making landfall there?
Then, you have to consider the optics, which aren't very good. On one hand complaining about the Biden, Kerry and Pelosi sons benefiting from their last names, and then to hold the G7 at a Trump property; someone in the administration needed to tell him 'No' to this one, I'm thinking.
I'll say one thing for Trump. He knew how stupid his base was. He knew it years ago. That's why he boasted about how he could commit murder in broad daylight and not lose a single vote.
And his supporters are so breathtakingly stupid that they didn't even realize that he was insulting them when he said that.
But he was right.
Not to mention the heat and humidity in June down there.
They may as well hold it in death valley...
There is no possible way of justifying this this clear abuse of power...
To be fair and honest, there's an entire nation of venues to choose from, for one, and it's been stated that the event would be during the middle of hurricane season, for another.
Can you imagine if in the middle of the G7 summit, there's a hurricane making landfall there?
Then, you have to consider the optics, which aren't very good. On one hand complaining about the Biden, Kerry and Pelosi sons benefiting from their last names, and then to hold the G7 at a Trump property; someone in the administration needed to tell him 'No' to this one, I'm thinking.
Yeah, the US government is lying to you and is going to close the facility for a week to host the G7 to make billions of dollars.
Grow up
Nothing here but blind accusations and fake outrage over nothing
Yeah, So all these federal government agencies, attorneys, and employees involved are all going to help in committing federal crimes but only you know better?
And what credentials do you have to make such a claim?
As always you don't know what your talking about, trump has visited coral once, not dozen's of times.
President Trump finally visits his Doral resort in Miami | Miami Herald
Nothing here but blind accusations and fake outrage over nothing
How about the fact that it's illegal for a government employee to award him or herself a government contract?
Why don't you put that question to Judge Napolitano, Fox's judicial consultant.
He's the one who made the assertion.
The case was so weak that "it readily provokes the question of whether this action against the President is an appropriate use of the courts," said a unanimous three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Virginia. The ruling was the third defeat for claims against President Trump based on the Constitution's emolument clauses.
No it trump who's lying, just as he did well, always...
You guys never learn, do you.
You mean the same guy who got the Emoluments clause case wrong 3 times that no other judge agreed with?
Appeals court dismisses emoluments clause case against Trump involving Washington hotel
FAIL (AGAIN)
I'll leave the "optics" up to people who care about that stuff.
All these federal government lawyers and employees have no clue what they are doing but you are the enlightened one? I think not.
You should do your homework before you stick your foot in your mouth.
Those were passive, where Trump did not control the saudis, etc., i.e., they were equivocal
But with G7, this is direct unequivocal involvement where Trump is dealing himself a government contract during the slow season in order to prop up Doral, which has been suffering financially.
Apparently you never learned to make distinctions where they are important and significant.
So the federal government attorneys, employees, and the advance committee who selected Doral have all agreed to commit federal crimes
OR
You are the only enlightened one?
lol
None of those persons for hire don't have to worry about violating emoluments clause, it is the president who violates emoluments. The constitution on emoluments pertains to the president.
ANd quite a few legal experts assert that it is a point blank violation of the constitution, people who are not being hired.
Apparently you are not enlightened enough to sort that one out.
Surely even Democrats know if you assist someone in the commission of a crime you would be charged as an accomplice, aiding and abetting, or an accessory.
This is why people don't believe all these Democrat theories. They just have no clue but are so quick to make statements about legal matters that never make any sense and never have the support of anything factual in law.
Surely even Democrats know if you assist someone in the commission of a crime you would be charged as an accomplice, aiding and abetting, or an accessory.
This is why people don't believe all these Democrat theories. They just have no clue but are so quick to make statements about legal matters that never make any sense and never have the support of anything factual in law.
Wrong again, impeachment is not a criminal procedure, and the rules of criminal procedure do not apply, REMEMBER?
So in your mind its perfectly legal to help anyone violate the constitution. Good to know.
So in your mind its perfectly legal to help anyone violate the constitution. Good to know.
This folks, is a text book example of your classic strawman argument.
Congratulations.
So in your mind its perfectly legal to help anyone violate the constitution. Good to know.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?