I vote 3rd party in local and state elections, it wont accomplish anything at this time in a national election.
So, nothing; it's just what you want to believe.
That of course is the kind of attitude that keeps the dual party system afloat.
Well all we have is your title serving as a direct quote (?).
I don't see how CR applies to this. He's only discussing the topic - likely answering a question (perhaps? I don't know). The POTUS has a right to an opinion on all subjects. That's not the same as pushing laws, announcing veto with reasons, or giving an executive order, etc.
If you have evidence to the contrary then please present it.
No, sir, you made the claim it was so. Present YOUR evidence. Not that you have any.
My claim is based on perception. When I see someone state something false I do the research and present the evidence that proves them wrong. I am not doing your homework for you.
It's not my homework to do. It's your claim to support.
And you can't. It's just what you want to be true.
It's somewhere in the lowlights compiled here.
Trump Vows to Trash the Constitution - Hit & Run : Reason.com
Of course he has a right to an opinion. We also have a duty as American citizens to be concerned when your next potential president openly states he is willing to ignore the Constitution if he feels its necessary.
Trump's response? "You know−the Constitution−there's nothing like it. But it doesn't necessarily give us the right to commit suicide, as a country, OK?"
Reality.
No it doesn't. It simply is the truth. Trying to make yourself feel better because you "vote your conscience" is just simply lying to yourself. You are actively helping the person you like less get elected.
Was wondering if anyone else noticed this bit from The Donald when he was interviewed on 60 Minutes. It is clear that he has a big enough ego to disregard Constitutional restrictions when in office. Shouldn't this concern constitutional conservatives?
You responded to me. If you care so much about changing my perception then present the evidence. Otherwise, move on.
No. I'm actively giving my vote to someone else and denying a vote to the person I don't like.
Nothing in there actively helps the person I dislike getting elected. The way you're viewing it is rather moronic.
I'm looking at it realistically. You are looking at it naively because all your vote does is give a vote to the candidate you dislike the most.
I'm looking at it realistically. You are looking at it naively because all your vote does is give a vote to the candidate you dislike the most.
Don't you call yourself an "independent"?
Yes, as in I am not always going to vote for the same of the two parties. But to actually think your third party vote means anything, you are lying to yourself.
Same here. Unfortunately, the Republicans are nominating one of the few that I and many others don't trust more than Hillary. Hell, many Republicans have already said they are either voting Hillary, Libertarian, or not at all.
I honestly don't think he's read the Constitution, much less understands it. But, maybe that's just me.
I honestly don't think he's read the Constitution, much less understands it. But, maybe that's just me.
So....when you vote for someone other than in the 2 majors....it means something?Yes, as in I am not always going to vote for the same of the two parties. But to actually think your third party vote means anything, you are lying to yourself.
So....when you vote for someone other than in the 2 majors....it means something?
LOL! Yes, it had a lot to do with the Constitution, since according to the Constitution we are legally bound by the treaties we sign and the laws we pass for ourselves.
Our actions there violated at least two treaties and four of our own laws.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?