Was wondering if anyone else noticed this bit from The Donald when he was interviewed on 60 Minutes. It is clear that he has a big enough ego to disregard Constitutional restrictions when in office. Shouldn't this concern constitutional conservatives?
Was wondering if anyone else noticed this bit from The Donald when he was interviewed on 60 Minutes. It is clear that he has a big enough ego to disregard Constitutional restrictions when in office. Shouldn't this concern constitutional conservatives?
I honestly don't think he's read the Constitution, much less understands it. But, maybe that's just me.
Wait, Trump isn't a champion of republicanism and the constitution?
Was wondering if anyone else noticed this bit from The Donald when he was interviewed on 60 Minutes. It is clear that he has a big enough ego to disregard Constitutional restrictions when in office. Shouldn't this concern constitutional conservatives?
Was wondering if anyone else noticed this bit from The Donald when he was interviewed on 60 Minutes. It is clear that he has a big enough ego to disregard Constitutional restrictions when in office. Shouldn't this concern constitutional conservatives?
Was wondering if anyone else noticed this bit from The Donald when he was interviewed on 60 Minutes. It is clear that he has a big enough ego to disregard Constitutional restrictions when in office. Shouldn't this concern constitutional conservatives?
Well you are either going to get Hillary Or Donald. and I would trust just about anyone more than Hillary.
Nah. Remember Iran-Contra. Remember Abu Ghirab. As long as it's their guy who's in charge, they really don't care what he does as long as they've got the power.
It does. They're called "NeverTrump."
We've moved on its more like #FeeltheJohnson now
There is someone who would like to stab you in the back and there's another person who just flails his knives around like a moron.
Then of course, there's a third party you can vote for in protest of the two aforementioned people.
voting for a third party in a presidential election only accomplishes electing the person that that third party is most oppositely aligned with ideologically. voting for Johnson would just help elect Hillary, voting for Stein would just help elect Donald.
I vote 3rd party in local and state elections, it wont accomplish anything at this time in a national election... in the future if more people pay attention to local and state elections and vote in them it might.
Abu Ghraib has nothing to do with the constitution since the constitution is silent on the treatment of foreign prisoners of war on foreign soil.
The only thing that stopped us from doing whatever the hell we wanted with the scumbags in that prison was ourselves.
That of course is the kind of attitude that keeps the dual party system afloat.
It does. They're called "NeverTrump."
Well you are either going to get Hillary Or Donald. and I would trust just about anyone more than Hillary.
There is no right to suicide that I'm aware of. However, it is universally agreed upon and documented even in our own American history that there is a right to life endowed to us by our creator (Declaration of Independence). I'd imagine like any other right, it is up to the person to choose whether to exercise it or not.
And yet you'd think Trump's biggest supporters (the "strict-constitutionalist" Tea Partiers) would be aghast.
I'm not sure that makes such a great sounding motto.
What makes you think Trump's "biggest supporters" are "Tea Partiers"?
Reality.
Was wondering if anyone else noticed this bit from The Donald when he was interviewed on 60 Minutes. It is clear that he has a big enough ego to disregard Constitutional restrictions when in office. Shouldn't this concern constitutional conservatives?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?