- Joined
- Nov 8, 2006
- Messages
- 13,406
- Reaction score
- 8,258
- Location
- Milwaukee, WI
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
No they were not, rasmeussen was literally the absolute closest on popular vote
This isn't even true. Rasmussen was closest on the popular vote SPREAD, i.e. the DIFFERENCE in vote proportions between Trump and Clinton. What they WEREN'T the most accurate on was the ACTUAL VOTE PROPORTION. Which is what actually determines accuracy.
If the vote spread was 1.7, and Rasmussen said Trump would get 31.7% of the vote and Hillary would get 30% of the vote and the rest would go to third parties, that isn't accurate at all, even though they got the spread right. Looking at the spread is completely meaningless. What matters is the actual vote breakdown.
Last edited: