Trump laughing about shooting migrants at the border

[cabse5]

Have no idea what you are talking about. What did McCain say about Trump? What have I said about Trump that is inaccurate? No need to call trump vile. How do you respond when he says that immigrants are poisonous snakes or that they infest us? I assume you don’t approve.

Here's just one example of the 'jabbing sessions' between Trump and McCain while many swear McCain was above the fray when it came to pollical infighting...NOT.https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ampaign-can-they-now-get-along/?noredirect=on

Here's another instance against Trump where McCain wasn't above the fray when it came to pollical infighting: McCain leaked the Steele dossier to the press.John McCain Suspected of Leaking 'Trump Dossier' To Media

And, of course, McCain refused to allow Trump at his funeral.

McCain wasn't above the fray, McCain just wanted to hold Trump (and anyone else) to a higher standard than him.

 

[cabse5]

If he stopped scapegoating migrants I would stop calling him a racist


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Then you lie.

 

[cabse5]

Why do you deny?

Because you haven't proven him a racist and he doesn't act like a racist...ever.

 

[cabse5]

Are you genuinely as ignorant of facts as your posts indicate?

Rhetoric isn't a good rebuttal.

 

[Condor060]

Let's look at your questions.
(2/2)

There are lots of falsies with your assessment. First and foremost you don't bring into account the criminal elements of illegal immigration like it doesn't exist and all of these people are from the land of unicorns. They are not. And you don't account for a lot of the reason we have these caravans coming to the border.

Currently over 26% of our federal prisons are criminal Illegal aliens and that is just our federal prisons. In Texas alone over the last 5 years they have over 250,000 illegals through their jails with the following convictions.

1,351 homicide charges
79,049 assault charges
18,685 burglary charges
79,900 drug charges
815 kidnapping charges
44,882 theft charges
50,777 obstructing police charges
4,292 robbery charges
7,156 sexual assault charges
9,938 weapons charges.

The Liberal media denies that illegals commit more crime than other groups stating the data is questionable and the fact that we don't have an exact number of Illegals in the US. But we do have real numbers they don't want to expose.

Nearly 3 percent of illegal immigrants in Arizona end up in state prison or jail during the course of a year four times the rate of U.S. citizens and legal residents, according to federal reimbursements for prisons and jails to try to calculate one of the most important yet unpublished by Liberal media statistics in the immigration problems.

In New Jersey, illegal immigrants are incarcerated five times more often, and rates on the West Coast are triple that of legal residents and citizens, according to the Federation for American Immigration Reform.

FAIR based its calculations on federal government reimbursements to states and localities under the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program, which pays some of the costs for holding illegal immigrants in prisons and jails. To make the payments, the federal government must determine whether an inmate is in the country illegally. FAIR used the number to then calculate overall incarceration rates.

The SCAAP numbers are the best calculation because they focus on those known to be arrested on criminal charges and whom federal officials have concluded are in the country illegally. Now that we have the overall rates of criminal behavior of people whom the government has confirmed are in the country illegally, and then to compare that to the rate of criminality by the rest of the population, the rate of crime per capita for illegals dwarfs any other groups.

For Arizona, analysts used 10,300 confirmed illegal immigrants for which the federal government reimbursed the state and counties in 2016. They subtracted that from an overall prison and jail population to get a non-illegal-immigrant population of 46,700.

Each of those numbers was stacked up against total populations. Arizona has an illegal immigrant population of 365,950 and non-illegal-immigrant population of 6.7 million. Incarceration rates were 2.815 percent for illegal immigrants and 0.702 percent for all others combined.

So the notion that Illegal immigrants are far less likely to commit crimes is utterly ridiculous and false.

Study finds high rates of prison, jail for illegals

Then you have states like California who provides Sanctuary cities to these individuals who can cross the border illegally. They provide refuge for anyone who can break our laws and a host of free goodies like education, medical, housing, and government funding. Coupled with the new Democratic party offering free tax payer funded healthcare, decriminalization, and the elimination of ICE and DHS, we will have even more people running for the border.

 

[Condor060]

To add to the mayhem even more lets look at population problems in California. They have over 140,000 homeless population while the total of 49 other states share 404,000 which is about 8000 per state. With the increase in the human population has come an inevitable decline in other species. Land used for housing, roads, businesses, schools and other forms of human activity has displaced land in its natural state. California has already lost 99 percent of its native grasslands, 80 percent of its coastal wetlands, and 94 percent of its interior wetlands.

At least 73 plants and animals are extinct in California and 134 species are threatened or endangered. The coastal redwood is the state tree, but logging has felled 96 percent of the original old-growth redwoods. The state animal, the California grizzly bear, appears on the state flag, but it is extinct in California.

Population growth aggravates virtually every environmental problem in the state, and threatens to erase the gains made through conservation measures and technological advances. Carbon dioxide emissions per capita in California have increased by 25 per cent as the soaring population has overwhelmed conservation efforts. California water shortages and population pressures threaten agricultural production as development now consumes an average of about 50,000 acres of farmland per year. One of every six acres developed in California since the Gold Rush was paved over between 1990 and 2004 according to American Farmland Trust, which notes, “The underlying causes of farmland loss in California are rapid population growth and the inefficient use of land”.

Even as California is in rapid decline and our federal prison system shows the crime rates of illegals on the rise, people are still advocating for free stuff for illegals and open borders and we haven't even touched on the people using our border laws for other nationalities to cross illegally.

No country can have unlimited access to immigrants. There has to be a finite number allowed in to keep the economy and resources stable. We need look no further than California to give you the perfect example of what illegal immigration populations will do. IF we can't manage our own population and homeless, why would we provide services to those who are not citizens over our own people?

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Because you haven't proven him a racist and he doesn't act like a racist...ever.

I don’t have to prove Trump is a racist. Trump has done a spectacular job of proving that, himself, over many decades.

Rhetoric isn't a good rebuttal.

It wasn’t a rebuttal. It was a question based on observation of your obvious ignorant post/s.

 

[HumblePi]

I've already given this rebuttal in other threads to your 'Blacks don't control anything economically, politically, anyhow, so how could blacks be racist' BS. African-American leaders control the African-American community. The African-American community controls African-Americans. Controls economically, politically and every which way in the African-American community. Anyone in the African-American community has experienced economic and political power when they exercise control over others in the African-American community both economically and politically.

Give an example of white racism? How many statues of non-white people have been toppled in the Virginia area, would you say? Why are people racist against whites when it comes to toppling statues and why hasn't anyone denounced this racism?

Here's another example of white racism that's allowed: This one happened in the US House of Representatives. Steve King, representative of the 4th district in Iowa, was censured and stripped of his committees because he didn't know what white supremacy meant and questioned why it wasn't outrageous to be proud of being white. BTW, is it also 'heinous' to be a black supremacist? A brown supremacist? I'm certainly not intimating King is a white supremacist...He isn't...but people wish to make him out to be one. Why isn't any black lives matter individual also denounced for their black supremacy, for example? Why isn't Escobar from Texas denounced as a brown supremacist?

The bolded area of your statement is false on its face. If "African-Americans" had the ability or capability of exercising control politically and economically, would they choose to remain living in poverty in those parts of big cities that whites don't inhabit-- out of poverty and necessity? No, of course they wouldn't and that's precisely why your statement is completely false. If they had political and economic control, more would be living in suburbia in $500k homes with an Escalade in the garage.

Okay now, about those 'white statues'. Those statues represent everything this country is trying to heal from, slavery. Those 'white statues' represent exactly that -- the era of slavery and the men that fought and died so they could continue to own slaves. Why would this country want the memory of confederate traitors on full display in parks and town squares where black people passing every day have to be reminded that their ancestors were slaves to the white man? I'm white and I would remove every single one of those statues if it were up to me. If white people in the south want to continue their memorization of the era of slavery and abuse of the black men, then they could keep the statues all together in one big Disneyland-type park for racists, or erect a big building like the Smithsonian of Slavery for those who wish to honor traitors to the Union.

There is no such thing as black racism of whites. PERIOD

Steve King has been an unchecked racist for decades and it's about time someone took him out of the range of being able to put bills up for discussion. Remember the remark about the Mexicans having "calves like cantaloupes from carrying drugs". Yeah, that's blatant racist at its finest.

 

[mike2810]

Then we can look at the people not as a problem of a 'threat', but as a problem of a humanitarian crisis to figure out how to practically address, wanting to help while not to open our borders to all comers.

(2/2)

We are a non starter with your open border position. What I took from your two post writing is the American taxpayer should flip the bill.

 

[Nickyjo]

Of course Obama shared a beer with the guy he wrongly slandered. His stupidity in jumping to wrong conclusions about the officer blew up in his face and he needed an out. Still, Obama did not apologize to the officer for his unjustified error in condemning him, not even after having a few beers.

You have the transcript of their conversation? The point was that Trump wouldnt do such a thing. Of course he would have to spend the rest of his term apologizing to people he had slandered, such is their number.

 

[Nickyjo]

Here's just one example of the 'jabbing sessions' between Trump and McCain while many swear McCain was above the fray when it came to pollical infighting...NOT.https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ampaign-can-they-now-get-along/?noredirect=on

Here's another instance against Trump where McCain wasn't above the fray when it came to pollical infighting: McCain leaked the Steele dossier to the press.John McCain Suspected of Leaking 'Trump Dossier' To Media

And, of course, McCain refused to allow Trump at his funeral.

McCain wasn't above the fray, McCain just wanted to hold Trump (and anyone else) to a higher standard than him.

Lessee, an article where McCain criticizes Trump bragging about assaulting women and a right wing website that says McCain is suspected of leaking info on Trump. And a war hero whose service is demeaned by Trump says Donald is not welcome at his funeral. That all you got?

And puleeze, no one could ever dream of holding Trump to an unreasonable standard. Impossible to even suggest such a thing. To show human decency and stop lying would be a marvelous improvement.

 

[tres borrachos]

Of course Obama shared a beer with the guy he wrongly slandered. His stupidity in jumping to wrong conclusions about the officer blew up in his face and he needed an out. Still, Obama did not apologize to the officer for his unjustified error in condemning him, not even after having a few beers.

God damns all liars to Hell, and the Ten Commandments say you shouldn't bear false witness, as you just did.

"Because this has been ratcheting up and I helped contribute to ratcheting it up, I want to make clear that in my choice of words I unfortunately gave an impression that I was maligning the Cambridge Police Department or Sergeant Crowley specifically, and I could have calibrated those words differently."

Barack Obama - Top 10 Apologies - TIME

 

[Craig234]

We are a non starter with your open border position. What I took from your two post writing is the American taxpayer should flip the bill.

Sorry you can't read, since 'my open border position' was to not have them.

 

[mike2810]

Sorry you can't read, since 'my open border position' was to not have them.

Past experience is you are not very direct in answering questions, " we might like a world with more equality and less suffering where we could allow open borders, like our states have, yet people have little reason to want to use them. But today, most say no, they're not for open borders. It was a Democrat, Obama, who deported three million people - more than trump."

Other posts in other threads pretty much shows you are pro illegal immigrant and those seeking asylum in the US. You use the word "we" as a collective answer. Seems you want to stay vague in your response.

Try responding without the attempt at insults.

 

[Craig234]

You're reading too much into it.

Wrong. You're a blind apologist for trump.

 

[Craig234]

Past experience is you are not very direct in answering questions, " we might like a world with more equality and less suffering where we could allow open borders, like our states have, yet people have little reason to want to use them. But today, most say no, they're not for open borders. It was a Democrat, Obama, who deported three million people - more than trump."

Other posts in other threads pretty much shows you are pro illegal immigrant and those seeking asylum in the US. You use the word "we" as a collective answer. Seems you want to stay vague in your response.

Try responding without the attempt at insults.

That was saying why we agree to NOT have 'open borders' for the foreseeable future. Yes, 'we' is referring to the Democrats, while you are representing the Republicans in this hypothetical 'deal'.

If you think saying you made a mistake in reading when you say the opposite of what I did is an insult, that's your choice. Stating that in the long term we might like to see open borders but they wouldn't be used much isn't 'my position' on policy now, yet you say something not relevant to current policy makes any agreement on current policy a 'non-starter', while you basically ignore all of some long posts.

 

[mike2810]

That was saying why we agree to NOT have 'open borders' for the foreseeable future. Yes, 'we' is referring to the Democrats, while you are representing the Republicans in this hypothetical 'deal'.

If you think saying you made a mistake in reading when you say the opposite of what I did is an insult, that's your choice. Stating that in the long term we might like to see open borders but they wouldn't be used much isn't 'my position' on policy now, yet you say something not relevant to current policy makes any agreement on current policy a 'non-starter', while you basically ignore all of some long posts.

Actually, I represent my own views regardless of political party. You made a wrong assumption about me.

 

[Craig234]

Actually, I represent my own views regardless of political party. You made a wrong assumption about me.

No, I didn't. I said that your position - which resembles many Republicans' position - represented the Republican position for purposes of the discussion. I see now I gave you too much credit as a possibly reasonable person for discussing this, and will correct that error now.

 

[mike2810]

No, I didn't. I said that your position - which resembles many Republicans' position - represented the Republican position for purposes of the discussion. I see now I gave you too much credit as a possibly reasonable person for discussing this, and will correct that error now.

"while you are representing the Republicans in this hypothetical 'deal'.",

So "you" is not referring to me.

 

[marke]

God damns all liars to Hell, and the Ten Commandments say you shouldn't bear false witness, as you just did.

"Because this has been ratcheting up and I helped contribute to ratcheting it up, I want to make clear that in my choice of words I unfortunately gave an impression that I was maligning the Cambridge Police Department or Sergeant Crowley specifically, and I could have calibrated those words differently."

Barack Obama - Top 10 Apologies - TIME

Translation: "I said the white officer acted stupidly but I did not mean for people to think I was maligning him or the Cambridge police department for the stupid act."

In the eyes of those who consider that an apology I understand why they would think I am lying for saying Obama acted stupidly for saying the officer acted stupidly for arresting the drunk and disorderly black man by the book.

 

[Irwin Corey]

Trump laughing about shooting migrants at the border

Watching him joke and smirk breaks my heart. We've come so far in the wrong direction in just over two years, tRump is a disgrace to himself and our Nation.

ANY RESPONSIBLE ADULT

*********2020********

 

[tres borrachos]

Translation: "I said the white officer acted stupidly but I did not mean for people to think I was maligning him or the Cambridge police department for the stupid act."

In the eyes of those who consider that an apology I understand why they would think I am lying for saying Obama acted stupidly for saying the officer acted stupidly for arresting the drunk and disorderly black man by the book.

You are constantly breaking The Ten Commandments. You are lying. Gates was not drunk and disorderly. He had just returned from a trip, his door was jammed, and he and his driver attempted to open it when a neighbor called 911. He was not drunk.

God damns all liars to Hell. Think about it. Sarah Sanders and Donald Trump already have their seats there waiting for them. Are you itching to keep them company?

 

[marke]

Watching him joke and smirk breaks my heart. We've come so far in the wrong direction in just over two years, tRump is a disgrace to himself and our Nation.

ANY RESPONSIBLE ADULT

*********2020********

Don't be fooled by smiles and smooth talk. Leftist policies are dangerous to American freedoms, liberty and prosperity.

 

[Irwin Corey]

Don't be fooled by smiles and smooth talk. Leftist policies are dangerous to American freedoms, liberty and prosperity.

I can only parody the phrase; "The Government of These United States is a terrible form of Government … except for anything else mankind has ever thought of."

A Democrat might make a terrible President but he/she'd be better beyond anyone's imagination than Donald Jane Trump. Hell Donald Duck would be a better President and he's a cartoon but nothing so much a JOKE as "the d0nald". <-- that's a zero incase you didn't notice … kinda like tRump.

 

[marke]

I can only parody the phrase; "The Government of These United States is a terrible form of Government … except for anything else mankind has ever thought of."

A Democrat might make a terrible President but he/she'd be better beyond anyone's imagination than Donald Jane Trump. Hell Donald Duck would be a better President and he's a cartoon but nothing so much a JOKE as "the d0nald". <-- that's a zero incase you didn't notice … kinda like tRump.

I thank God the majority of Americans do not think like you.