• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Judge Rules It’s OK to Discriminate Against LGBTQ People. Why has the GOP come to oppose transgenders so vigorously?

Nevertheless, the right-wing stripped them of a constitutional right that even a pro-life woman might need to save her life.

And this thread isn't about transgenders in sports.
trans in sports is the only explanation for your shift described in OP
 
DARVO.



Social cons were falsely accusing gay men of flaunting their shit in men's locker rooms. Now that homophobia is out of style and replaced with transphobia, the same false accusations are firing off but in the other locker room.
So you agree the gays are not doing that in womens locker rooms. That only trans are exposing themselves in hirls and womens licker rooms.
 
Trans porn tends to be the main kind of porn in anti-trans states, so there's something to this.
How woud youknow that? Are you watching porn all the time?
 
It seems to me the porn industry recognizes it as neither male or female.
I've seen the summer 2 with a lady that tries to look like a dude all except for their groin cuz obviously and no they're not fooling anybody that's just straight sex. The woman just happens to be Butch.
 
The right blames the left for focusing on identity issues, yet they seem to be the ones doing it.
The topic of identity issues of this kind began on The Left about thirty years ago. Saith Wiki:

 
Yet its the Dems who are guilty for making it an issue.
They would have liked it if everyone just rolled over and accepted their take on the issue. That didn't happen, but they began the movement. Not that all Dems did. Didn't Obama define marriage as the union of a man and a woman?
 
I find it interesting that when I was starting a lot of threads about men raping little girls (it's mainly just straight men) that hardly any conservatives would post in those threads.

Those rapes didn't generate the same kind of emotional response in MAGA that trans people do.
 
They would have liked it if everyone just rolled over and accepted their take on the issue. That didn't happen, but they began the movement. Not that all Dems did. Didn't Obama define marriage as the union of a man and a woman?

Your ignoring the fact that the poll shows most Republicans didn't support anti-trans bathroom restrictions and Trump claimed there were no problems with trans using the bathrooms.

So the GOP did roll over, and made trans a central issue, and then blamed the Dems for making it so!
 

No transgenders on the team, but this guy can be their coach.

 
Religious liberties are just exceptions to public accommodation laws
 
Your ignoring the fact that the poll shows most Republicans didn't support anti-trans bathroom restrictions and Trump claimed there were no problems with trans using the bathrooms.
Let's talk about some rights instead of toilets do you have any point about rights?
So the GOP did roll over, and made trans a central issue, and then blamed the Dems for making it so!
And you're ignoring rights to talk about toilets.
 

Your link lies behind a paywall, btw.
 
A lot happened since 2016, as the Dems became increasingly toxic on many topics, partly though not wholly because Trump won the Presidency that year. "Bathroom bills" took on greater importance as the Left largely supported other trans causes, like trans women in women's sports. It's not a question of rolling over but of opposing an attempt to change society along undesirable lines.
 
Wow. Looks like the left has finally found an activist judge. I thought they didn't exist.
Tell us that this is the first time you’ve ever heard of Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

If you believe that U.S. District Court judges should not be able to make court decisions that bind the entire country, which I bet you do, then that Amarillo judge should be the first one you focus on. He’s got quite the history of doing it after the Republicans did their judge shopping. The right doesn’t believe that kind of thing applies to them.
 
The topic of identity issues of this kind began on The Left about thirty years ago. Saith Wiki:

Yet in 2016, Trump claimed there were no problems with transgenders using the bathroom of their choice.

What happened?
 

Yeah, it's sort of a confession that they routinely use activist judges.
 
Sorry, but saying that all males must use facilities designated for males is NOT discrimination.
 
Sorry, but saying that all males must use facilities designated for males is NOT discrimination.

The ruling seems to go beyond that.

"Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee, specifically targeted transgender people in his ruling, stating that they had to simply deal with any kind of discriminatory treatment in their workplace..."
 
There is no discrimination.

Other people born with a penis and testicles are not allowed to compete against women, either.
 
The ruling seems to go beyond that.

"Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee, specifically targeted transgender people in his ruling, stating that they had to simply deal with any kind of discriminatory treatment in their workplace..."
What rights are being violated here? Be specific.