I heard it today. Sounded more like a call out to the possibility of revolution, to me.
Which is the purpose of the 2nd.
I'm beginning to think Trump is just trolling the whole world; if not then he really is dangerous. Now he has suggested that the '2nd amendment' is an option to stop Clinton picking supreme court judges.
“If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,” he said, adding: “Although the second amendment people – maybe there is, I don’t know.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/09/trump-gun-owners-clinton-judges-second-amendment
We all know what he meant when he said that. A not so subtle threat. This is a worrying new low in US politics: A presidential nominee suggesting the assassination of his opponent.
And Trump supporters will defend him... again.
I heard it today. Sounded more like a call out to the possibility of revolution, to me.
Which is the purpose of the 2nd.
Why would a president choosing supreme court judges require a revolution??
And Trump supporters will defend him... again.
So in other words "if Hilary gets elected, well.....*wink wink, nudge nudge*...... there could always be another revolution, right?"
More stupidity.
No, read the link in the OP.
If she succeeds in neutering the 2nd amendment.
No, read the link in the OP.
If she succeeds in neutering the 2nd amendment.
I'm beginning to think Trump is just trolling the whole world; if not then he really is dangerous. Now he has suggested that the '2nd amendment' is an option to stop Clinton picking supreme court judges.
“If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,” he said, adding: “Although the second amendment people – maybe there is, I don’t know.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/09/trump-gun-owners-clinton-judges-second-amendment
We all know what he meant when he said that. A not so subtle threat. This is a worrying new low in US politics: A presidential nominee suggesting the assassination of his opponent.
And Trump supporters will defend him... again.
That boogieman never gets old.
Yup...remember all the same blather that Obama "was gonna take our guns?"
Fear as a motivator doesn't work for long.
Yup...remember all the same blather that Obama "was gonna take our guns?"
Fear as a motivator doesn't work for long.
Yup...remember all the same blather that Obama "was gonna take our guns?"
Fear as a motivator doesn't work for long.
I'm beginning to think Trump is just trolling the whole world; if not then he really is dangerous. Now he has suggested that the '2nd amendment' is an option to stop Clinton picking supreme court judges.
“If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,” he said, adding: “Although the second amendment people – maybe there is, I don’t know.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/09/trump-gun-owners-clinton-judges-second-amendment
We all know what he meant when he said that. A not so subtle threat. This is a worrying new low in US politics: A presidential nominee suggesting the assassination of his opponent.
And Trump supporters will defend him... again.
Maybe he was saying "2nd Amendment people, you can stop her (with your guns)". Or maybe he was saying "2nd Amendment people, maybe you can take over the Senate when they are having confirmation votes on Hillary's picks and put a stop to it, however you must". Or maybe he was just joking. Or maybe he was saying "2nd Amendment people, I know I was like best friends with her for years, and said repeatedly that she was a terrific woman, the best Secretary of State ever, and would make an amazing President, but now I'm pretending to support you so please go forth and make menaces of yourself because I'm too stupid to beat her". Or maybe he was joking (he needs someone to help write jokes for him). Or maybe he was being an ignorant asshole, as usual. Who knows?
Which isn't going to happen, which is obvious to all but the most paranoid.....
Or maybe he should start speaking in complete sentences instead of stringing together three word phrases that make your town drunk sound coherent. He is going to be leader of the free world if he wins.
That is not obvious to me in the least. Just replacing the majority opinion in Heller with Justice Stevens' dissent would read the individual right to keep and bear arms out of existence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?