• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump held secret meetings in days before Capitol attack, ex-press secretary tells panel

Who are you talking about? Are you talking about Trump's white trash supporters who tried to overturn the election based on Trump's false allegations of fraud using violence and the threat of violence? THAT lynch mob?

No.
 
all mafia bosses have secret meetings and lean how to talk so that shit can't get traced back to them.

hell, he probably learned that in the 1980s.
 
The Republican Party of Hillsdale County, Michigan held an "Insurrection Anniversary" party and fund raiser. I guess they weren't told that saying insurrection was a no no.

View attachment 67372055

This announcement looks like there are politicians trying to stir outrage in the weak minded.

They seem to be doing a fine job.
 
You do know you sound like you are reading from the Trump/Tucker Carlson playbook.

It's just flat protecting Trump. Like a teenage girl with a shit boyfriend. "He cares about me and he's a good boyfriend!"

He doesn't wanna see racist fascism fail.
 
Why was it NOT an insurrection?

Because it does not meet the requirements of the definition of the word insurrection.

<snip>
In insurrection there is an organized and armed uprising against authority or operations of government whereas riots and offenses connected with mob violence are simply unlawful acts in disturbance of the peace which do not threaten the stability of the government or the existence of political society.
<snip>
 
Because it does not meet the requirements of the definition of the word insurrection.

<snip>
In insurrection there is an organized and armed uprising against authority or operations of government whereas riots and offenses connected with mob violence are simply unlawful acts in disturbance of the peace which do not threaten the stability of the government or the existence of political society.
<snip>

I know you think your "common sense" and "gut" tell you more than all the scientists and doctors on the entire planet, but you now think you know more about law than all the legal scholars too? LOL.

 
WW sent you the truth, in post # 254. I explained it to you in post # 262. It is clear that what they wanted, and what they arranged is not in the constitution or in the code and Pence knew it. Why can't other people understand what Pence understood?
Trump supporters will tell any lie if they think it helps him, and deny any simple fact that they think hurts.
If a person needs to lie to defend the ex-president, maybe he's not worth lying for.
Bye Code, see ya around

You are living in a dream world where people who work for and at the pleasure of the President are working against him.

Are you wearing a tin foil hat while you are typing here?
 
Because it does not meet the requirements of the definition of the word insurrection.

<snip>
In insurrection there is an organized and armed uprising against authority or operations of government whereas riots and offenses connected with mob violence are simply unlawful acts in disturbance of the peace which do not threaten the stability of the government or the existence of political society.
<snip>

Shall we refresh your memory too?

 
Rep. Adam Kinzinger, one of two Republican members of the House committee investigating the attack on the Capitol, tweeted: "This is an admission, and a massively un-American statement. George Conway, a lawyer and the husband of former White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, added: "The answer is: The Twelfth Amendment and the Electoral Count Act of 1887 already make it entirely clear that the Vice President merely opens the envelopes. But sometimes we want to make laws even clearer so that even semiliterate psychopaths have a chance at understanding them." Just before he was due to begin presiding over the joint session of Congress to count the votes, Pence issued a statement in which he made clear there is no constitutional or legal basis for him to reject the election votes during his purely ceremonial role as presiding officer of the Senate.

Why are you satisfied that the Never Trumpers populating this lynch mob are honest arbiters of truth in this.

THEY ARE ALL LYING THIEVES.

Neither of the Never Trumpers cherry picked by the Democrats as fig leaves to legitimize the Lynch Mob's Kangaroo Court are anything but biased and hate filled Never Trumpers.
 
It's just flat protecting Trump. Like a teenage girl with a shit boyfriend. "He cares about me and he's a good boyfriend!"

He doesn't wanna see racist fascism fail.

You are quick to mislabel things based only on your bias and hate.

An interesting style.
 
I know you think your "common sense" and "gut" tell you more than all the scientists and doctors on the entire planet, but you now think you know more about law than all the legal scholars too? LOL.


You are citing the ideas of propagandists working tirelessly to deceive the weak minded.
 
Why are you satisfied that the Never Trumpers populating this lynch mob are honest arbiters of truth in this.

THEY ARE ALL LYING THIEVES.

Neither of the Never Trumpers cherry picked by the Democrats as fig leaves to legitimize the Lynch Mob's Kangaroo Court are anything but biased and hate filled Never Trumpers.

Interesting you object to the 1/6 Committee makeup.

Did you support the Arizona Senate Committee that investigated the 1/6 election in Arizona? Was it unbiased in its work? The same group that hired Cyber Ninjas to do the audit.
Do you realize it was made up of two Republicans and held its business when the AZ Senate was not in session?
 
You are citing the ideas of propagandists working tirelessly to deceive the weak minded.

Yes. Legal scholars, medical doctors, scientific organizations, and military generals are all propagandists. We should only listen to Tucker Carlson for the truth! 😆
 
Shall we refresh your memory too?


I understand that there were attacks on a Federal Court House in Portland in which there was arson and attempted murder.

Was this an insurrection?

Are sedition and insurrection interchangeable terms in US Law?
 
I understand that there were attacks on a Federal Court House in Portland in which there was arson and attempted murder.

Was this an insurrection?

Are sedition and insurrection interchangeable terms in US Law?
Was it an attack with the purpose of overturning an election?
 
Interesting you object to the 1/6 Committee makeup.

Did you support the Arizona Senate Committee that investigated the 1/6 election in Arizona? Was it unbiased in its work? The same group that hired Cyber Ninjas to do the audit.
Do you realize it was made up of two Republicans and held its business when the AZ Senate was not in session?

I didn't really follow the Arizona proceedings except that I was aware that it was happening and waiting to see if anything came of it.

The 1/6 Sham is exactly like the rest of the Democrat Kangaroo Courts that have been ongoing as attacks on Trump since they started with the Russian Collusion lies.

Do you really not see the connection in these? How many times must the lesson be taught before you learn the lesson?
 
Yes. Legal scholars, medical doctors, scientific organizations, and military generals are all propagandists. We should only listen to Tucker Carlson for the truth! 😆

Do your posts make any sense to you?
 
Was it an attack with the purpose of overturning an election?

By any reasonable standard, it wasn't really even an attack.

Unarmed people with no plan wandering aimlessly with no leadership is hardly an attack.

By the time any folks from the National Guard had arrived, almost everyone who wandered in in the first place had wandered back out.
 
Do your posts make any sense to you?
What part of "medical and scientific organizations have more credibility than Tucker Carlson" doesn't make sense?
 
Unarmed people with no plan wandering aimlessly with no leadership is hardly an attack.

Wandering aimlessly? They were there for a reason. What was that reason?
 
I didn't really follow the Arizona proceedings except that I was aware that it was happening and waiting to see if anything came of it.

The 1/6 Sham is exactly like the rest of the Democrat Kangaroo Courts that have been ongoing as attacks on Trump since they started with the Russian Collusion lies.

Do you really not see the connection in these? How many times must the lesson be taught before you learn the lesson?


The lesson has been taught plenty of times alright. Pretty successful kangaroo court so far.

 
I didn't really follow the Arizona proceedings except that I was aware that it was happening and waiting to see if anything came of it.

The 1/6 Sham is exactly like the rest of the Democrat Kangaroo Courts that have been ongoing as attacks on Trump since they started with the Russian Collusion lies.

Do you really not see the connection in these? How many times must the lesson be taught before you learn the lesson?

So you are ok with an all-Republican committee but not a committee where Republicans are the minority.

We will disagree on the 1/6 Committee being a sham.
Don't you want to know what led up to and happened on 1/6 ?
 
What part of "medical and scientific organizations have more credibility than Tucker Carlson" doesn't make sense?

In context, you are presenting propaganda from one set of propagandists and another set of propagandists.
 
Back
Top Bottom