I'm glad that those guys testified and their testimony was very compelling. But, where in the hell have they been since 1/21? Were they just hoping this would all die down? I don't get it.Again today we watched three republican individuals from the DOJ testifying about 1/6. These are not entry level players, these are the folks who make it into the oval office to speak with the president level of people.
So again, if you watched the hearing today, in order to believe the election was stolen, you must believe every witness is lying under oath.
Which side do you fall on?
Just think, when Trump wins in 2024, he'll make big changes in how he hires people. And, with an American First Congress, don't be surprised if there are big changes to the Civil Service laws and regulations.Again today we watched three republican individuals from the DOJ testifying about 1/6. These are not entry level players, these are the folks who make it into the oval office to speak with the president level of people.
So again, if you watched the hearing today, in order to believe the election was stolen, you must believe every witness is lying under oath.
Which side do you fall on?
These are people who have already testified. They were trotted out for the live dog and pony show to do it in public. You won't see a lot of people who have testified because they haven't agreed to follow the narrative construction.I'm glad that those guys testified and their testimony was very compelling. But, where in the hell have they been since 1/21? Were they just hoping this would all die down? I don't get it.
Do you have evidence that they voluntarily provided information to the committee without being asked for information?These are people who have already testified. They were trotted out for the live dog and pony show to do it in public. You won't see a lot of people who have testified because they haven't agreed to follow the narrative construction.
But.... But...
But.... But.... Only the Dem presidents weaponize the DOJ... LOL..
A fine upstanding person like Trump would never do that... Lol..
These are people who have already testified. They were trotted out for the live dog and pony show to do it in public. You won't see a lot of people who have testified because they haven't agreed to follow the narrative construction.
Who do you think the 'dog and pony show' should have called to prove your point?These are people who have already testified. They were trotted out for the live dog and pony show to do it in public. You won't see a lot of people who have testified because they haven't agreed to follow the narrative construction.
Equating a lie about an oval office tryst with evidence that a President directed a criminal conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction of an official proceeding is ... hilariousI don't agree with political prosecutions like this no matter which side does it. Remember when Bill Clinton had to undergo the blue dress stain Congressional hearings? It makes our country look bad, hands down.
I don't agree with political prosecutions like this no matter which side does it. Remember when Bill Clinton had to undergo the blue dress stain Congressional hearings? It makes our country look bad, hands down.
Again today we watched three republican individuals from the DOJ testifying about 1/6. These are not entry level players, these are the folks who make it into the oval office to speak with the president level of people.
So again, if you watched the hearing today, in order to believe the election was stolen, you must believe every witness is lying under oath.
Which side do you fall on?
Rinos have replaced Hillary as the hated one
Dont forget 4 years of Benghazi.. 4 YEARS... At the end even some Republicans walk away and admitted it was nothing more than a political witch hunt..But it worked..I don't agree with political prosecutions like this no matter which side does it. Remember when Bill Clinton had to undergo the blue dress stain Congressional hearings? It makes our country look bad, hands down.
Dont forget 4 years of Benghazi.. 4 YEARS... At the end even some Republicans walk away and admitted it was nothing more than a political witch hunt..But it worked..
Hilarious. You have one wild imagination.Just think, when Trump wins in 2024, he'll make big changes in how he hires people. And, with an American First Congress, don't be surprised if there are big changes to the Civil Service laws and regulations.
For example, the Dems are proposing stiff penalties for SCOTUS leakers. Just imagine the same for Congress and the Executive Branch.
Its Not a political prosecution.I don't agree with political prosecutions like this no matter which side does it. Remember when Bill Clinton had to undergo the blue dress stain Congressional hearings? It makes our country look bad, hands down.
You are right. The Clinton thing was ridiculous. Unfortunately for you what Trump did isn't even close to that in the danger it poses to our country.I don't agree with political prosecutions like this no matter which side does it. Remember when Bill Clinton had to undergo the blue dress stain Congressional hearings? It makes our country look bad, hands down.
I didn't say that happened.Do you have evidence that they voluntarily provided information to the committee without being asked for information?
How do you know they haven't perjured themselves already? Hell, how do you know whether they are or are not telling truth or lies?More likely they dont want to have to perjor themselves.
See Rudy.
I think the testimony of EVERY SINGLE PERSON CALLED TO TESTIFY should have been public.Who do you think the 'dog and pony show' should have called to prove your point?
Because they are hiding Trumps innocence from you right?I think the testimony of EVERY SINGLE PERSON CALLED TO TESTIFY should have been public.
The dog an pony show is hiding anything that doesn't aid their narrative from the American people.Because they are hiding Trumps innocence from you right?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?