• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Trump has undisclosed bank accounts in 3 foreign countries

Yep. Druggieson has no experience in anything. Gets over 80K a year and a seat on the board. Burisma under investigation. Needs to have the wolves called off and asks Hunter to take care of it. He calls dad has a secret off the books meeting with a Burisma official and marches over there and says "If you don;t fire the prosecutor investigating the company my son works at, you don't get a billion dollars"

Nothing to see here folks.
You're right, because Burisma wasn't under investigation when Biden (along with everyone else in the civilized world) pressured Ukraine to fire Shokin. And in fact replacing a prosecutor that was declining to prosecute corruption made it more likely Burisma would be investigated.

But don't let silly things like logic and the basic factual timeline get in the way of your desired narrative.
 
You're right, because Burisma wasn't under investigation when Biden (along with everyone else in the civilized world) pressured Ukraine to fire Shokin. And in fact replacing a prosecutor that was declining to prosecute corruption made it more likely Burisma would be investigated.

But don't let silly things like logic and the basic factual timeline get in the way of your desired narrative.
He testified that he was on to Burisma and was going to go after them, and all of a sudden, he was fired. Seems kinda funny that Hunter is working for a shady company who uses him to get daddy involved to shut down the investigation, eh? Isn't Hunters partner in crime in jail now?
 
He testified that he was on to Burisma and was going to go after them, and all of a sudden, he was fired. Seems kinda funny that Hunter is working for a shady company who uses him to get daddy involved to shut down the investigation, eh? Isn't Hunters partner in crime in jail now?
You are desperate to derail this thread aren't you? This thread about Trump being the crook he is.
 
He testified that he was on to Burisma and was going to go after them, and all of a sudden, he was fired.
Please link to the "testimony" of this totally credible witness. Bonus points if you are quoting notes taken by Giuliani.

There is documentary evidence and statements from Ukrainian officials that the Burisma investigation was shelved long before Shokin was fired. Meanwhile, there is no evidence whatsoever that Shokin ever actively investigated Burisma. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...e-probe-casts-doubt-on-giuliani-s-biden-claim

Curious Republicans didn't call Shokin as a witness in the impeachment hearings, no?

Meanwhile, we have an actual transcript of Trump flat out asking Zelensky to do him a "favor" by opening an investigation into the Bidens and oh, there's nothing to see there, totally legit behavior..... Let's talk instead about an unauthenticated email in which some guy thanks Hunter for giving him an "opportunity" to meet Joe at some unspecified time to talk about who knows what--what a smoking gun!

Isn't Hunters partner in crime in jail now?
Do you really want a list of all of Trump's business partners, advisors, friends, etc., who are in jail, have been found guilty of fraud, or are currently under investigation? Let's recall that we are talking about Trump himself, not any of his sons. Is that really the metric you want to use here?
 
Please link to the "testimony" of this totally credible witness. Bonus points if you are quoting notes taken by Giuliani.

There is documentary evidence and statements from Ukrainian officials that the Burisma investigation was shelved long before Shokin was fired. Meanwhile, there is no evidence whatsoever that Shokin ever actively investigated Burisma. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...e-probe-casts-doubt-on-giuliani-s-biden-claim

Curious Republicans didn't call Shokin as a witness in the impeachment hearings, no?

Meanwhile, we have an actual transcript of Trump flat out asking Zelensky to do him a "favor" by opening an investigation into the Bidens and oh, there's nothing to see there, totally legit behavior..... Let's talk instead about an unauthenticated email in which some guy thanks Hunter for giving him an "opportunity" to meet Joe at some unspecified time to talk about who knows what--what a smoking gun!

Do you really want a list of all of Trump's business partners, advisors, friends, etc., who are in jail, have been found guilty of fraud, or are currently under investigation? Let's recall that we are talking about Trump himself, not any of his sons. Is that really the metric you want to use here?
Is this Adam Schiff's brother? Or Vindman? Fess up.
 
Is this Adam Schiff's brother? Or Vindman? Fess up.
Who, the person contradicting Shokin's story? Why don't you read the articles posted and see for yourself, there are tons of sources listed.
 
Yep. Druggieson has no experience in anything. Gets over 80K a year and a seat on the board. Burisma under investigation. Needs to have the wolves called off and asks Hunter to take care of it. He calls dad has a secret off the books meeting with a Burisma official and marches over there and says "If you don;t fire the prosecutor investigating the company my son works at, you don't get a billion dollars"

Nothing to see here folks.

No, there isn't. We have a long history of companies paying sons/daughters/brothers of politicians for the perception of access. Neil Bush, a prominent recent example. It may offend your sensibilities, but unless you can find an actual case where there was actual influence, its not against the law.

Meanwhile, we have a President that his actually putting money in his pocket as he president.

Sorry, but no one cares about Hunter. His connections with Ukraine have been well investigated. Republicans are running the Benghazzi playbook (keep investigating, even though nothing is there) while Trump is once again trying to deflect from his own corruption (what is this $17M bank account in China?; how much money has he taken in personally as President?) by projecting it on the other guy. Oddly, it did work in 2016; its not going to work this time.

I suggest you use your posts to speak about real issues, like defending Trump's corona virus response. That is what is going to lose him the election (that, plus people are just tired of all of this acrimony).

Meanwhile, I suggest you study up on the issue of the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor as you clearly are being fed a pack of lies and swallowing them without critical thought. That is dangerous.

https://www.businessinsider.com/hun...kraine-involvement-with-trump-giuliani-2019-9
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/28/politics/fact-checking-trump-ukraine-scandal-bidens/index.html
.
https://www.factcheck.org/2019/10/fact-trump-tv-ad-misleads-on-biden-and-ukraine/
 
Last edited:
Who, the person contradicting Shokin's story? Why don't you read the articles posted and see for yourself, there are tons of sources listed.
No. I figured YOU were Adam Schiff who lied about what the favor was. All of your sources are far left Goebbelsian Assassins. Here is an article for you.

 
No, there isn't. We have a long history of companies paying sons/daughters/brothers of politicians for the perception of access. Neil Bush, a prominent recent example. It may offend your sensibilities, but unless you can find an actual case where there was actual influence, its not against the law.

Meanwhile, we have a President that his actually putting money in his pocket as he president.

Sorry, but no one cares about Hunter. His connections with Ukraine have been well investigated. Republicans are running the Benghazzi playbook (keep investigating, even though nothing is there) while Trump is once again trying to deflect from his own corruption (what is this $17M bank account in China?; how much money has he taken in personally as President?) by projecting it on the other guy. Oddly, it did work in 2016; its not going to work this time.

I suggest you use your posts to speak about real issues, like defending Trump's corona virus response. That is what is going to lose him the election (that, plus people are just tired of all of this acrimony).

Meanwhile, I suggest you study up on the issue of the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor as you clearly are being fed a pack of lies and swallowing them without critical thought. That is dangerous.

https://www.businessinsider.com/hun...kraine-involvement-with-trump-giuliani-2019-9
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/28/politics/fact-checking-trump-ukraine-scandal-bidens/index.html
.
https://www.factcheck.org/2019/10/fact-trump-tv-ad-misleads-on-biden-and-ukraine/
Bad sources. All in the pockets of the Dems. This is a better source.

 
Nobody cares.
 
Back
Top Bottom