I have always wondered what the MSM was...............news sources which report news folks as yourself do not wish to hear? And how did you ever come to the conclusion that the MSM is liberal and deliberately distorts/lies/propagandizes the news in a liberal way to trick folks as yourself...............Did some one tell you that was so?.................or was it thru your own investigation?
The majority of the MSM has a liberal bias, mainstream media is defined as mass media that influences a large number of people, it tends to follow the general train of thought of everyone else, and offers less dissenting thought than alternative media. Broadcast news stations tend to effect the largest amount of people, while cable new stations effect less but tend to have more dissenting thought.
Example one, In the 2000 Election the Media falsely reported Bush had lost Florida, and it costed him many voters in the state, because of many Bush voters staying home thinking their candidate had already lost to Gore, this resulted in a closer vote than should have been, and could of costed Bush the state.
Example two, Left-wing bias tends to be against the tea party movement. Any manner of attacks have been thrown at the Tea Party, they have been called racists, homophobes (accurate in most cases), haters, and even terrorists! There was one such incident, where the media ascribed the Obama-as-Hitler signs at a Tea Party rally, to the Tea Party itself! In fact, they belonged to the nutty LaRouche organization, a group the Tea Party has openly loathed.
NBC, CNN and MSNBC All Assign Communist LaRouche's Obama-Hitler Poster to Conservatives, Limbaugh
Example three, the media constantly had Obama's back during his first 100 days, they were right behind him, and he is of course left-wing.
http://archive.mrc.org/SpecialReports/2009/100Days/100DaysPDFversion.pdf
Example four, this isn't liberal bias, but it is anti-family bias. Fathers are portrayed as absolutely worthless, they are always shown in a negative manner. The media shows them as hateful, disinterested in their family, and idiotic. This however is merely a sidenote, as it is not primarily in the MSM
EDITORIAL: Anti-Dad bias - Washington Times
Example five, Poor old, Herman Cain when he was running for the GOP nomination he ran into a lot of media bias, he was often referred to as an "Uncle Tom", they accused him of infidelities that were ultimately never proven, but we look to the favorable treatment of Bill Clinton, John Edwards, and other Democrat's infidelities they were often ignored, or avoided for extensive periods of time, before the media decided to cover it. However Cain's accusations hit the fan almost immediately. He was not given the benefit of the doubt.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...-race-problem/2011/03/04/gIQAO1dGyL_blog.html
My final example, the treatment of Dan Quayle as compared to that of Joe Biden. Dan Quayle minor missteps were blown to massive proportions just by misspelling potato, the media went on unrelenting assaults on the VP's intelligence, which ultimately destroyed any further political opportunities for the poor man. However Joe Biden who believes all Indian-Americans worked at Dunk'n Donuts, and 7-11s is just "Joe", and asking a man in a wheelchair to stand up, and not remembering what the "number" of a website was, but the media will still wonder if he is going to run for president, not the same treatment Quayle got.
Washingtonpost.com Special Report: Clinton Accused
http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=9443
^ Pure brilliance :lamo
To be honest I dislike bias in either form, Conservative or Liberal, it bothers me, it is impossible to find an impartial source now, unless you dig through the internet, and pray. For now I have to crosscheck sources to formulate a fair opinion on a subject. "Faux" news has gotten worse, and worse, and NBC hasn't been good in a long while.