• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump calls on Sessions to end Russia probe ‘right now’

Not my advice, the advice of any lawyer or court when it comes to legal action. Trump exercises his freedom of speech just like you are doing, unless action takes place that is illegal you leftists have nothing. I quite frankly love seeing just how radical the leftwing rhetoric is and know the public will look at their bank accounts and compare that to the demon the left says Trump as. You aren't going to like the results

Leftwing rhetoric?

You mean to tell me that "Mexicans are all rapists", "Muslims need to stay away because they are all terrorists", "Lock her up", "Kim Jung un is a good person that cares about his people". Putin did not meddle with our elections", "its all Fake News", etc, etc, etc......... is not right wing rhetoric?
 
Leftwing rhetoric?

You mean to tell me that "Mexicans are all rapists", "Muslims need to stay away because they are all terrorists", "Lock her up", "Kim Jung un is a good person that cares about his people". Putin did not meddle with our elections", "its all Fake News", etc, etc, etc......... is not right wing rhetoric?

yep, got you riled up didn't it, so what, why does that bother you so much. Much of what you and the left post is indeed fake news and most of what you post is out of context.
 
The electoral college has been skewed for many year by gerrymandering. The bottom line is that Trump lost the election by over 3 million votes. As such, do not say that the electoral college was a true representation of what the "people" wanted.

By the same token, the disapproval rate of Trump has been between 34% and 44% throughout his Presidency, meaning that there are more people that disapprove than approve. This supports my statements. After 18 months of Trump lack of morals, ethics, principles and humanity, I believe you are going to see a big difference in the coming elections. Do you NOT remember that one of the reasons that Trump won was because he was running against a candidate (Hillary) that was also heavily flawed. As such, the election was more about the "lesser of two evils" than it was about Trump being a winner.

As far as why Obama lost the House and the Senate, you need to remember also that he personally could not run again and it was believed by most that Hillary would win against Trump, meaning that like always the Democrats did not show up to vote. I don't believe that will happen this time.

Your comments have a lot of flaws and holes the size of canyons in them and are not convincing other than to say that Money is God to a large amount of the population. It is sad when that is the case because even though money will allow us to survive physically, it does nothing for our humanity. Have we lost that already? If we have, then we can expect that the Constitution is no longer important as the Constitution is more about morals, ethics, principles and humanity that it is about money.

By the way, you still have not addresses the morals, ethics, principles and humanity issues. Does that mean that money is your ONLY God? It is for Trump. Is that the same for you?

So in your world people are robots, probably true when it comes to liberalism but Obama won twice and that destroys your rhetoric. Whether or not people approve or disapprove will be determined at the ballot box. I don't approve of what Trump says but results always trump rhetoric. You put way too much value on rhetoric and so little on actual results

You are right Obama's personality wasn't on the ballot those that supported his record, his policies and then his legacy were and they LOST

Your opinion is just that yours, and my comments are supported by the data you want to ignore. Not exactly sure what you want because all I see are attacks on Trump. What policies do you want the Democratic party to overturn if they take back power? What is their platform? Have you ever taken a civics class?

I voted for Trump not because of any rhetoric and wasn't influenced by propaganda, I voted for change and the results we have today are the ones I wanted, strong economic growth, job creation, more spendable income, and America first. Sorry it doesn't meet your agenda
 
There is a difference between an official statement and an order. Did Trump order the firing? Of course not that would be an action and actions are punishable, not rhetoric. Whether or not his claims pass the smell test is irrelevant were they a violation of the law. NO

The reality is that the "smell test" reeks of attempts to manipulate and stop a lawful investigation. Have you forgotten that the Which Hunt has found over 30 witches in the form of 5 guilty please and 25 injunctions? Trump has stated over 187 times that it is "a Which Hunt" and that certainly sounds like someone that is "trying" to convince people he is innocent through words and not through deeds and actions.

If I told you 187 times that I was not a thief, would you tend to believe me or be more convinced that I was............words are cheap!
 
If the GOP congress thought there was a chance they could throw red meat to their base by going after Obama for anything, including "obstruction" they'd be doing it right now. They'd be going on a hearings tour like they did with the Benghazi inquisition. The fact is, there is no "there" there.

Lately they've been doing an investigation into the investigation of the investigation of Hillary's emails.
 
There is a difference between an official statement and an order. Did Trump order the firing? Of course not that would be an action and actions are punishable, not rhetoric. Whether or not his claims pass the smell test is irrelevant were they a violation of the law. NO

So conservative, who is a con troll who's only thing is life is posting far right wing drivel on this board, is still at it at pre dawn hours in Houston. But if that is your job, and you have no other job, you can post 24/7, and since you job is to push RW talking points, you pretty muck know what is coming out of his pie hole before it escapes. Poor sad boy.
Con does not understand that investigators do not pay attention to him, and will determine what the Trumpster is saying using LOGIC. Which is beyond con's pay grade. For those who do work, and have a boss, they actually know what it means if their boss says they should do whatever. Because they either do what the boss said they should do, or they start looking for a new job.
 
Last edited:
So in your world people are robots, probably true when it comes to liberalism but Obama won twice and that destroys your rhetoric. Whether or not people approve or disapprove will be determined at the ballot box. I don't approve of what Trump says but results always trump rhetoric. You put way too much value on rhetoric and so little on actual results

You are right Obama's personality wasn't on the ballot those that supported his record, his policies and then his legacy were and they LOST

Your opinion is just that yours, and my comments are supported by the data you want to ignore. Not exactly sure what you want because all I see are attacks on Trump. What policies do you want the Democratic party to overturn if they take back power? What is their platform? Have you ever taken a civics class?

I voted for Trump not because of any rhetoric and wasn't influenced by propaganda, I voted for change and the results we have today are the ones I wanted, strong economic growth, job creation, more spendable income, and America first. Sorry it doesn't meet your agenda

As I have stated many times before, I had never voted until this past election. That means that whether the Democrats or Republicans are in office makes little difference to me. Nonetheless, I voted in this past election because Trump is the WORST person for the office. I do not have any agenda other than to vote the Devil out of office. Trump is the Devil and not the party (though I have to admit that the way the Republicans have acted with Trump doing the things that he has done like minions of the Devil, supporting a lack of morals, ethics, principles and humanity makes me now wonder about them). I never thought I would see that happen but it just goes to show what little morality is left in the Republican Party.

I am not ignoring any data. I have already agreed with you and with all those that have brought it in other posts that under Trump people are slightly better economically than they would be otherwise. Nonetheless, other than with money, name me one thing that the American people now have that they didn't have under Obama (or any other President for that matter).

This is all about greed and in my opinion stupid greed. If I was to get $1 million dollars in my pocket and be able to support and help my family in a big way I might think about it twice but for the amount of money (pennies and a few dollars) that Trump has put in the pocket of most of the populace (not the rich of course, here he has been the Magi), I would not sell my soul to the Devil as most of the Trump supporters have done.
 
Lately they've been doing an investigation into the investigation of the investigation of Hillary's emails.

Yep— and in doing so discovered the very anti-Trump/pro-Clinton opinion of the investigators.

Justice Dept. internal review said this was okay because there was no evidence that these opinions had any bearing on the investigators actions. It also said their actions during the investigation were warranted as they have the right to act in such a way in pursuant to their job.

Naturally, in a world of equal justice under the law, the Trump obstruction investigation needs to end, as Trump has not ended the investigation, and he is allowed to weigh in on the actions of his subordinates, both as a First Amendment issue, but also as a supervisor.
 
Re: Trump says Sessions should stop Mueller investigation

Innocent of what?

I too want proof before convicting anyone but in Trumps case there is plenty of evidence of possible wrong doing. Remember we don't see the whole picture or evidence but from what we have seen.... a full investigation into everything from money laundering to corruption is fully warranted.



Sendt fra min SM-N9005 med Tapatalk

Proof of wrongdoing has never been proven, even remotely. The fact that there is an investigation shouldn't even prove much as it is, as we have seen plenty of those go down the drain as well.

Aside from the information that has been leaked, which doesn't damn Trump in the slightest. "Which you think would be the information they choose to leak" I don't really know what to think about the whole thing. Mueller had a good career before all of this with little pitfalls and now he is stuck trying to prove something that the Dems got all butt-hurt about after 2016 and continually cried with no evidence.

As it stands, we still don't have hard proof of his guilt. We have seen people try to link the folly of his underlings to him, but in the end it might just be too big of a bill for them to pay out and they could wreck all of their chances.
 
The reality is that the "smell test" reeks of attempts to manipulate and stop a lawful investigation. Have you forgotten that the Which Hunt has found over 30 witches in the form of 5 guilty please and 25 injunctions? Trump has stated over 187 times that it is "a Which Hunt" and that certainly sounds like someone that is "trying" to convince people he is innocent through words and not through deeds and actions.

If I told you 187 times that I was not a thief, would you tend to believe me or be more convinced that I was............words are cheap!

The reality is the smell test is never going to be prosecuted in court and doesn't constitute a high crime and misdemeanor, actions do. Your point of what you tell me is right on, your actions speak louder than words so regardless of what you tell me I will verify the accuracy of your words against actions

As for indictments, how many convictions have been handed out? You can indict a ham sandwich but still waiting for exactly what it is you want to see happen. trying to convince people? He doesn't have to convince anyone until charged
 
yep, got you riled up didn't it, so what, why does that bother you so much. Much of what you and the left post is indeed fake news and most of what you post is out of context.

It was you that mentioned the Left Wing rhetoric, not me. I was just trying to prove to you that the Right Wing rhetoric is more than the Left Wing rhetoric. Do you not like people to try to prove their points, such as you should be trying to prove yours?
 
Luckyone;1068853267]As I have stated many times before, I had never voted until this past election. That means that whether the Democrats or Republicans are in office makes little difference to me. Nonetheless, I voted in this past election because Trump is the WORST person for the office. I do not have any agenda other than to vote the Devil out of office. Trump is the Devil and not the party (though I have to admit that the way the Republicans have acted with Trump doing the things that he has done like minions of the Devil, supporting a lack of morals, ethics, principles and humanity makes me now wonder about them). I never thought I would see that happen but it just goes to show what little morality is left in the Republican Party.

the electorate disagreed with you and Trump is President. I voted for Trump for change and against incompetent Hillary. I was right and the results justify that. Calling the President the devil is nothing more than emotional rhetoric not supported by data or the facts none of which seem to matter to you.

I am not ignoring any data. I have already agreed with you and with all those that have brought it in other posts that under Trump people are slightly better economically than they would be otherwise. Nonetheless, other than with money, name me one thing that the American people now have that they didn't have under Obama (or any other President for that matter).

Strong economic growth and full time job creation along with a President who will defend this country and enforce any red line drawn. He has destroyed ISIS. There are only two issues truly of importance to the American people, the economy and national security. Bottom line nothing else matters for without a strong defense there is no economy and without a strong economy there is nothing but dependence

This is all about greed and in my opinion stupid greed. If I was to get $1 million dollars in my pocket and be able to support and help my family in a big way I might think about it twice but for the amount of money (pennies and a few dollars) that Trump has put in the pocket of most of the populace (not the rich of course, here he has been the Magi), I would not sell my soul to the Devil as most of the Trump supporters have done.

Tell me exactly what any rich person has done to prevent you from joining them? What has Trump done that has taken away any opportunity you have for the future? You don't seem to understand the difference between creating your own financial independence and being dependent on a federal bureaucrat for your personal responsibility needs. Until you answer the question posed you are nothing more than a typical radical trying to implement a socialist agenda and massive central govt. because of an inability to compete.

Selling your soul to the devil means exactly what, taking care of your family because you have more spendable income and because you have the opportunity to grow and succeed? That certainly isn't my definition
 
If you think that 44 is guilty of a crime against this nation, write your congressman and demand that there be an investigation. There is nothing your base would like more than a way to vilify Obama. Go for it!

Read better.

Nowhere did I suggest that Obama should be impeached. I demonstrated that impeachment was not a remedy for obstruction.
 
It was you that mentioned the Left Wing rhetoric, not me. I was just trying to prove to you that the Right Wing rhetoric is more than the Left Wing rhetoric. Do you not like people to try to prove their points, such as you should be trying to prove yours?

You don't see right wing rhetoric inciting riots and attacks on leftwing support groups but both sides have their radicals. would love to have you try and prove your point but do so with data not opinions and rhetoric.

You want to defend Obama, why? He is out of office. You want to ignore the Trump results, why, they are benefiting the American people. Celebrate them instead of demonizing rhetoric to divert from the results
 
Here is more of the problem you have with data, jobs created by Obama were part time for economic reasons meaning people unable to find full time jobs in that Obama booming economy so they had to take part time jobs. These numbers skewed the unemployment rate as they are counted as employed which they were but that isn't a good indication of economic policy strength and who do you think these people voted for

Whatever. Bottom line is that Trump is the worst.
 
You don't see right wing rhetoric inciting riots and attacks on leftwing support groups but both sides have their radicals. would love to have you try and prove your point but do so with data not opinions and rhetoric.

You want to defend Obama, why? He is out of office. You want to ignore the Trump results, why, they are benefiting the American people. Celebrate them instead of demonizing rhetoric to divert from the results

I am defending Obama because you brought him up originally.
 
Seeing as Trump did nothing wrong in this regard. The rant was vastly wasted.

Just one more thing for you to have to rush and defend, huh?
 
He has the authority to fire Mueller or Sessions because, as president all executive power flows through him.

Which means he is also allowed to weigh in with his opinion.
Trump can't end the investigation because of dirty politics. If Trump ends it, more cries of obstruction will ring throughout Congress, at least. I'm already resigned that Mueller's witchhunt will drag on until, at least, the midterm elections in November in an attempt the affect those midterm results.

If the same dirty politics were pulled on Obama while he was president, Washington would be in flames by now.
 
Ah trump is the one running his fat mouth....yet you babble about "Obama"

It's all about Trump, isn't it? Do you suppose you wish to delegitimatize Trump's presidency?
 
Re: Trump says Sessions should stop Mueller investigation

He's had so many "I am not a crook." moments, I've lost count.

When the press makes that 'you are a crook' accusation to Trump daily, Trump has to rebut, daily. Figure it out, just once.
 
Yes, pulling out the BUTWHATABOUTOBAMA card with every f'ing thread on Trump is a sure sign of someone triggered. It's sad, really.

I think the press pulling out its 'you are a crook card' at every news conference of the Trump administration is evidence the press is triggered with Trump. Anyone disagree the press isn't triggered with Trump?
 
the electorate disagreed with you and Trump is President. I voted for Trump for change and against incompetent Hillary. I was right and the results justify that. Calling the President the devil is nothing more than emotional rhetoric not supported by data or the facts none of which seem to matter to you.



Strong economic growth and full time job creation along with a President who will defend this country and enforce any red line drawn. He has destroyed ISIS. There are only two issues truly of importance to the American people, the economy and national security. Bottom line nothing else matters for without a strong defense there is no economy and without a strong economy there is nothing but dependence



Tell me exactly what any rich person has done to prevent you from joining them? What has Trump done that has taken away any opportunity you have for the future? You don't seem to understand the difference between creating your own financial independence and being dependent on a federal bureaucrat for your personal responsibility needs. Until you answer the question posed you are nothing more than a typical radical trying to implement a socialist agenda and massive central govt. because of an inability to compete.

Selling your soul to the devil means exactly what, taking care of your family because you have more spendable income and because you have the opportunity to grow and succeed? That certainly isn't my definition

Retorting back to all your retorts is ridiculous given that your are not addressing the issues. You say thatt the only thing that is important to the American People is the Economy and National Security. What made you a spokesperson for the American People? You have no right to make that statement since you can only talk about what is important to you and not to anyone else.

I am fine economically and my complaints aren't about me or for me. I generally care about fairness in life and will work to accomplish it wherever possible. Contrary to you that don't seem to care about anything other than what you personally want, which is clearly only economics and national security. Nonetheless, if the Left does rise and they are attacking you and your family, would you care about why they are doing it so that they could be stopped?

As far as Trump being the Devil. Below is a link to a site that shows what are the 5 characteristics of a Devil and with the "possible" exception of #4, Trump has all of them. As such, comparing him to the Devil is a fair assessment.

5 Characteristics of the Devil | Jake Kail
 
The reality is the smell test is never going to be prosecuted in court and doesn't constitute a high crime and misdemeanor, actions do. Your point of what you tell me is right on, your actions speak louder than words so regardless of what you tell me I will verify the accuracy of your words against actions

As for indictments, how many convictions have been handed out? You can indict a ham sandwich but still waiting for exactly what it is you want to see happen. trying to convince people? He doesn't have to convince anyone until charged

Being blind to what is happening is certainly one of the characteristics of Trump supporters.
 
Back
Top Bottom