- Joined
- May 22, 2012
- Messages
- 104,398
- Reaction score
- 67,589
- Location
- Uhland, Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
You misunderstand the case results. People appointed to independent agencies in govt (SEC, FCC, Federal Reserve) can only be fired with cause. Political appointees can be fired as soon as he gets to them.The President does not need Congressional approval, but the President can only fire them for cause. Humphrey's Executor v. United States. So, no, they won't lose their jobs next week, and I'll bet Biden keeps most of them anyway as one tool to appear to be a peace maker.
No grasshopper, they succeeded in getting on the FBI most wanted list. Winning.
OK, but that’s like a bit like saying that a quarterback succeeded in throwing an interception.
Are you referring to Nadia Peloski?So Trump are putting his people in as top officials at state agencies.
By the way, This Peloski is certainly a fighter, I am impressed, but usually those people (in my experience) gets to pay heavy prices. Well hopefully not in the US.
People hired into the civil service can not be fired with out cause even by the president. People appointed by the president serve at his pleasure.Doesn't that depend on how the employment contract looks like?
That's what I thought.People hired into the civil service can not be fired with out cause even by the president. People appointed by the president serve at his pleasure.
The President does not need Congressional approval, but the President can only fire them for cause.
So Trump are putting his people in as top officials at state agencies.
By the way, This Peloski is certainly a fighter, I am impressed, but usually those people (in my experience) gets to pay heavy prices. Well hopefully not in the US.
So Trump are putting his people in as top officials at state agencies.
By the way, This Peloski is certainly a fighter, I am impressed, but usually those people (in my experience) gets to pay heavy prices. Well hopefully not in the US.
Huh?Secretary of State?
What difference does that make? The subject is an appointment to the NSA which is definitely a federal organization.Is the State Department a federal or state agency?
Another good argument against democracy.Exactly.
This is Trump being malicious.
Then the bitch says good luck to Biden in todays speech. Trump is teh biggest piece of shit the country has ever produced.
Well if they can;t be fired that can be transferred to Antarctica to oversee something.Doesn't that depend on how the employment contract looks like?
No, the republicans wanted an honest election. That will come sooner than later. Whether you agree or not is not really the issue.Say, didn't the rightwing just try to cancel a national election?
The OP is Swede I think. While I don’t speak Swedish I think state may be a literal translation used in the context of government and not our legal distinction between levels of governmentNSA is not a state agency, it’s part of federal government.
Wrong, the republicans wanted insurrection and they will pay the price. Justice will prevail whether you agree or not.No, the republicans wanted an honest election. That will come sooner than later. Whether you agree or not is not really the issue.
Wrong, the republicans wanted insurrection and they will pay the price. Justice will prevail whether you agree or not.
I dunno, why are conservatives so obsessed with the DNC?There's been no insurrection. Why do liberals continually mimic DNC narratives? The word insurrection is embarrassing to use now. They've completely screwed up the meaning of the word.
That made no sense. Of course I didn’t expect a sensible response.I dunno, why are conservatives so obsessed with the DNC?
Perhaps you'd prefer the insurrection be called domestic terrorism and sedition, is that it?