Just curious, were you going to vote for Hillary?
Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
So that's a yes. Thanks, that tells us all we need to know about your chastisement.If you're talking about the 2016 election
As an anti Trump vote I had no choice. Any third party vote would have been a vote for Trump
But you're using "were you" leaves me scratching my head as to which election you are talking about
So that's a yes. Thanks, that tells us all we need to know about your chastisement.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Cant stand constructive criticism, can you?
Its funny you talk about "critical thinking" as you whine about "concrete evidence". there was ample evidence to open an investigation. there was ample evidence to put numerous trump aides in jail. There was not "ample evidence" to open an investigation into President Obama's birthplace, religion or tan suit. But the good news is you've come along way from the obedient lying conservative narrative of "wah wah witchhunt"
and trump attacking Nato exactly as predicted by the Steele Dossier seems pretty concrete to me.
Given the ultra-liberal looniness of academia you're probably correct - they'll all participate in a giant circle jerk about it - even though it's never been proved.
So what? That's common with Presidents elect - making contact with foreign governments is part of preparing to assume the job.
If I have to guess a trump supporter response to this, it will either be
a)It was none of our business so it was okay to lie about those contacts, or
b)Obama said that if we liked our doctor we could keep our doctor
I just want to know, if this is about facts, truth, justice, lies, etc. and not a partisan orgy or to get Trump out of office, then why is Bill Clinton a Democratic hero?
Heck, they'll probably burn the books that show there was no Trump collusion and teach the kids that Trump was a traitor.
We know what the present day loons are capable of...
It was different when Hillary showed the reset button... They didn't even bat an eyelash when their anointed one had hot mic moment with one of Vlad's boys.
The double standard rears its ugly head...
Sorry, but I am not compelled to alter my beliefs because you don't like them.
oh trix, thanks for the laughs. I have to point out its funny for too reasons. First, I was simply showing the flaws in your "critical thinking". "Concrete proof" is not required to start an investigation. And there must be some "concrete proof" somewhere because several of trump's inner circle have plead guilty. And the second reason is especially funny. As you whine about me trying to "alter your beliefs" I've shown that you've already "altered your beliefs". You changed it from "wah wah witchhunt" to "wah wah no concrete proof". Yep, facts tend to force conservatives (or conservative like posters) to "alter" their obedient and false conservative narratives.
and not for nothing, you and yours weren't really concerned about "concrete proof" when you said President Obama was born in Kenya, his BC a forgery, he wants to kill old people and of course the vile and disgusting "stand down" lies.
Sorry, but I am not compelled to alter my beliefs because you don't like them.
You lecture me about concrete proof and in the same post accuse me of "saying" President Obama was born in Kenya, something I've never thought, let alone put in writing?
What do you do for encores?
When future American history professors tell their students that the 45th President was an agent for Russia, all of the students will say in unison, "Yeah, no ****, Sherlock." The professor will silently nod until the students are quiet again, and will launch into a lecture on how populism and the electoral college allowed for a Russian asset to be made President in the first place.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/01/26/us/politics/trump-contacts-russians-wikileaks.html
I would only point out that the graph is slightly confusing in that it distinguishes between "had contact" and "denied contact" as though the "had contact" incidents were not denied. Those incidents marked as "had contact" only mean that the person having contact with Russians didn't directly deny those contact, just that those contacts probably weren't disclosed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?