- Joined
- Nov 7, 2019
- Messages
- 10,190
- Reaction score
- 2,141
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Are YOU in favor of or against financial fraud?
I have clearly and repeatedly answered this and also explained why it is not relevant in this matter.
Well, no. No one should be persecuted. But anyone who thinks Trump isn't guilty of many, many crimes is a lying piece of shit. Let him have his time in court and hang himself.
Oh, Trump is arguably one of the worst people in government in a very long time. He just isn't a good person in any aspect of his life. That said, it doesn't change my view of these particular circumstances. If the IRS were to file a charge related to these sorts of issues I would be far more willing to consider them as merit based, or even a US-AA, but when a person seeks office on the basis of a political persecution and then the best they can do is a civil case? That's weak and it smells of politics.
Look, you catch the guy lying about basis, realized gains/losses, misrepresenting tax filings, or falsified docs or something. Great, slam him good, no shits given here. This way though? No bueno.
Because I don't feed the sealions, sorry. The filing contains this information and has been posted. As have the laws mentioned within.
I have perused the filing, I haven't seen anything resembling a concrete case of financial fraud, the entire manner it is being pursued indicates they don't have anything like that. The closest argument I can see for the NYAG's case is the conservation easement, but even that depends on a lot of particular details that aren't mentioned. The rest is absolutely laughable.
You are in a position of saying you don't understand how James could allege Trump broke laws.
Actually, she is saying that by failing to bring a criminal case. Moreover, she is bringing an incredibly weak case as part of a political campaign.
Somehow you think that's everyone else problem
It isn't. Good luck.
When you catch up, come on back.
Again, you have made statements that clearly show how little you actually understanding the law, finance, and high level lending. You have grossly misrepresented the facts, the law, and the burden of proof.