"As a part of his review, Huber examined documents and conferred with federal law enforcement officials in Little Rock who were handling a meandering probe into the Clinton Foundation, people familiar with the matter said. Current and former officials said that Huber has largely finished and found nothing worth pursuing..."
So when Bill paid off Paula Jones $850K with no admission of wrongdoing there is a taint of guilt? Hillary paid part of the settlement from her blind trust so thateans she has the taint too.
So, you agree with AG Barr's conclusion after reviewing Mueller's allegations of obstruction, nothing worth pursuing? Oh wait, that's different.
Hilarious! Trump settled to avoid a potentially even more costly trial. His fake 'university' was deemed fraudulent, in court, by a judge. Are you really ignorant of this? 'New job' my arse
www.theguardian.com
abcnews.go.com
Hunter Biden? I couldn't give one flying care, but I am consistent. If he broke laws, he should be held accountable. But let's get real: He doesn't matter. He's just the right's wet dream of a diversion from the Trump Criminal Family.
This thread is becoming painful because of you. Endless, relentless, incessant references to Bill and Hillary Clinton. The topic is the Trump Wannabe Mob, but you can't even address it because you're flailing in whataboutisms.
"But Hunter Biden" isn't a legal objection. You cannot plea "But Hunter Biden" in court.
Meh. Law enforcement has their shortcomings, but I don't put any stock into the fake law enforcement types who actually have no respect for law enforcement.
How credible is it to insist we must willfully blind ourselves to Hillary's blatant illegal activity and the corruption involved in giving her a pass due to unknown factors? In the Democrat narrative we trust, any questions are not permitted. Don't believe your lying eyes, Hillary didn't intend to break the law by decree of the infallible keepers of the rule of law.That is not a simple fact, its a complex opinion .... complex because it involves multiple variables, most of which you are not privy... hence, its really nothing more than a gut feeling (an ill-informed opinion). Please better understand the difference between 'fact' and 'opinion' as understanding the distinction is key to you achieving the status of credible debater... Here is a little more background on the issue to bring you up to speed.
Why the FBI Let Hillary Clinton Off the Hook
Law enforcement officials look for clear criminal intent in cases like this.time.com
Meanwhile, you do realize that Comey's sideshow that he ran of announcing no prosecution and then letting Senator's know that he re-opened the case (which was leaked) just before the election likely cost Clinton the election, so it was not without consequence. So enough with this stuff that the FBI did not prosecute to help her in election. They likely cost her the election.
The Comey Letter Probably Cost Clinton The Election
So why won't the media admit as much?fivethirtyeight.com
Comey cost Clinton the presidency, no question: #tellusatoday
Readers react to the FBI director’s testimony before Senate.www.usatoday.com
Also, stop with the whataboutism's..... It is a poor debate tactic that should only be used when you can not defend the primary postulate at hand. It is often used in defending Trump because the actions of Trump are not defensible. A "whataboutism" is "I can't speak to the main issue, so what about this other issue?..." And, like most Whataboutisms, what Trump is being accused of is almost always far graver than the whatabout distraction. On this issue as well .....
MSN
www.msn.com
Case in point: What is relevance does the FBI inquiry into Hillary Clinton's email server when discussing the the NYAG's filing a fraud lawsuit against the Trump Organization? Talk about changing the subject because you can't deal with the topic at hand.....