• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Trump accused of Sexual Assault (yet again).

Carolina

Active member
Joined
Aug 3, 2020
Messages
431
Reaction score
432
Location
Davidson, NC
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
A former model has accused President Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her at the U.S. Open tennis tournament in 1997, adding to the list of more than two dozen women who have publicly accused Trump of sexual misconduct over the last few decades.

Amy Dorris told The Guardian that Trump “shoved his tongue” down her throat and grabbed her butt and breasts outside the bathroom in his VIP box at the tournament in New York. Dorris and her then-boyfriend, media mogul Jason Binn, were guests in Trump’s box during the event.

“I was in his grip, and I couldn’t get out of it,” Dorris told The Guardian.

“I don’t know what you call that when you’re sticking your tongue just down someone’s throat,” she added. “But I pushed it out with my teeth. I was pushing it. And I think I might have hurt his tongue.”

Dorris was 24 at the time. Trump was 51 and married to his second wife Marla Maples.


The dude is on tape saying you can do whatever you want to Women when you're a wealthy celebrity. Grab them by the ****** if you want. While I'm sure the Trump lovers will deny it, I think its very "on brand" with Trump's own words.


Former Model Amy Dorris Says Trump Sexually Assaulted Her At U.S. Open In 1997 | HuffPost
 
Two points here.

(1)The Guardian is a British journal. Liberals were arguing for four years that Russians should not have been involved in gathering data on Hillary, in any way. They have absolutely no leg to stand on now.

(2)This is not a good topic for Democrats, considering Joe’s record.
 
Two dozen, twenty-dozen.

It don't matter to a Trumpkin. They would only believe this if it were pointed at a democrat or liberal politician. Then they would eat it up like chocolate cake.

The people's minds are made up.

Not even worth taking the time to discuss, IMO.
 
"He added, "I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. ... Grab ‘em by the *****. You can do anything.” Commentators and lawyers have described such an action as sexual assault."
 
A former model has accused President Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her at the U.S. Open tennis tournament in 1997, adding to the list of more than two dozen women who have publicly accused Trump of sexual misconduct over the last few decades.

Amy Dorris told The Guardian that Trump “shoved his tongue” down her throat and grabbed her butt and breasts outside the bathroom in his VIP box at the tournament in New York. Dorris and her then-boyfriend, media mogul Jason Binn, were guests in Trump’s box during the event.

“I was in his grip, and I couldn’t get out of it,” Dorris told The Guardian.

“I don’t know what you call that when you’re sticking your tongue just down someone’s throat,” she added. “But I pushed it out with my teeth. I was pushing it. And I think I might have hurt his tongue.”

Dorris was 24 at the time. Trump was 51 and married to his second wife Marla Maples.


The dude is on tape saying you can do whatever you want to Women when you're a wealthy celebrity. Grab them by the ****** if you want. While I'm sure the Trump lovers will deny it, I think its very "on brand" with Trump's own words.


Former Model Amy Dorris Says Trump Sexually Assaulted Her At U.S. Open In 1997 | HuffPost

She picks just now to come out? I call bull****.
 
Two dozen, twenty-dozen.

It don't matter to a Trumpkin. They would only believe this if it were pointed at a democrat or liberal politician. Then they would eat it up like chocolate cake.

The people's minds are made up.

Not even worth taking the time to discuss, IMO.

Why did you all think it was appropriate to have Bill Clinton speak at your DNC?

And what are your feelings towards the dozen accusations by females accusing Joe of sexually harassing them?

Why is it acceptable for the British to be interfering in our election? Is the Biden campaign colluding with the British?
 
Two points here.

(1)The Guardian is a British journal. Liberals were arguing for four years that Russians should not have been involved in gathering data on Hillary, in any way. They have absolutely no leg to stand on now.

(2)This is not a good topic for Democrats, considering Joe’s record.

The Guardian is a newspaper well entitled to report the news, regardless of it is from the US or not...
 
Why did you all think it was appropriate to have Bill Clinton speak at your DNC?

And what are your feelings towards the dozen accusations by females accusing Joe of sexually harassing them?

Why is it acceptable for the British to be interfering in our election? Is the Biden campaign colluding with the British?
I personally do not think Clinton should have spoken there...but I don't get to pick the speakers...so, as an individual why do you think we have any power at all over who speaks there?
Do you have power over the kooks that spoke at the RNC?
 
Two points here.

(1)The Guardian is a British journal. Liberals were arguing for four years that Russians should not have been involved in gathering data on Hillary, in any way. They have absolutely no leg to stand on now.

(2)This is not a good topic for Democrats, considering Joe’s record.

Well, at least they're not denying it anymore.... :shrug:
 
I personally do not think Clinton should have spoken there...but I don't get to pick the speakers...so, as an individual why do you think we have any power at all over who speaks there?

No, but I didn’t read a single post from any liberal poster on this board complaining that Bill Clinton was speaking.

In general, a lot of excuses being made for Bill Clinton, such as “I support him as a President, just not his personal life.”

Not exactly the same approach liberals take with Trump.
 
The Guardian is a newspaper well entitled to report the news, regardless of it is from the US or not...

Then you feel the same way about Russian journals, correct?

The Guardian is a far left British journal, essentially a socialist journal.
 
No, but I didn’t read a single post from any liberal poster on this board complaining that Bill Clinton was speaking.

In general, a lot of excuses being made for Bill Clinton, such as “I support him as a President, just not his personal life.”

Not exactly the same approach liberals take with Trump.

I didn't watch the DNC and I think the way we deal with that isn't by complaining as much as it is by not watching him. Most people don't care what Clinton did or doesn't do anymore...he hasn't been president in what? 20 years?
 
And what are your feelings towards the dozen accusations by females accusing Joe of sexually harassing them?

There are not a dozen accusations against Biden.

trump has dozens of accusations against him, all supporting each other, and even backed up by his own claims. trump is one of the accusers against himself.

Biden has ONE accuser, Tara Reade. Her story has massively changed over the years.
 
Two points here.

(1)The Guardian is a British journal. Liberals were arguing for four years that Russians should not have been involved in gathering data on Hillary, in any way. They have absolutely no leg to stand on now.

(2)This is not a good topic for Democrats, considering Joe’s record.

Joe's record? Trump has 24 credible sexual assault accusations. How many does Biden have?
 
Why did you all think it was appropriate to have Bill Clinton speak at your DNC?

And what are your feelings towards the dozen accusations by females accusing Joe of sexually harassing them?

Why is it acceptable for the British to be interfering in our election? Is the Biden campaign colluding with the British?

The Guardian is not an arm of the British Government, you tool.
 
Why did you all think it was appropriate to have Bill Clinton speak at your DNC?

And what are your feelings towards the dozen accusations by females accusing Joe of sexually harassing them?

Why is it acceptable for the British to be interfering in our election? Is the Biden campaign colluding with the British?

Why do the Republicans think a man on tape confessing to being a sexual predator should be their nominee?
 
Then you feel the same way about Russian journals, correct?

The Guardian is a far left British journal, essentially a socialist journal.

:lol:

Hang on...

:lol:
 
Why do the Republicans think a man on tape confessing to being a sexual predator should be their nominee?

1. It was a private conversation. Who knows what Joe used to talk about behind people’s backs.

2. Sacrificing your political beliefs for a personality incident is politically irresponsible. And would indicate that you really don’t care about political policy, or value its importance.
 
There are not a dozen accusations against Biden.

trump has dozens of accusations against him, all supporting each other, and even backed up by his own claims. trump is one of the accusers against himself.

Biden has ONE accuser, Tara Reade. Her story has massively changed over the years.

Biden has 8 accusers.

And unlike with Biden, Pence does not believe the women who made these accusations against Trump.
 
Biden has 8 accusers.

We started with you claiming a dozen. I can only find ONE, and not a credible accuser at that. Now you claim 8... But somehow I bet you cannot name more than one... Or even show where they have a legal case under a Jane Doe... Or anything.

The fact is trump accusers outnumber Biden single accuser nearly a hundred to one. One of trump's accuser is himself, which differs from any previous politician.
 
We all know the ***** grabber and cheater is a pig. But things coming out this late are suspect...why didnt they come out during the first campaign? Or when it happened (I realize that can be very difficult, but still....)

His followers dismissed all the other low-brow disrespect of women; while it's not hard to believe he's done this, it's too little, too late.


This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
1. It was a private conversation. Who knows what Joe used to talk about behind people’s backs.

2. Sacrificing your political beliefs for a personality incident is politically irresponsible. And would indicate that you really don’t care about political policy, or value its importance.

So nominating a sexual predator is not a big enough deal to set aside your politics.
 
Back
Top Bottom