• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Traitor in Chief

calamity

Privileged
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
160,900
Reaction score
57,849
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
So, I take it there will be a contingent here who are fine with this.

On Thursday, Putin gave a public address to Russian diplomats in which he claimed that specific “useful agreements” were reached with Trump in their one-on-one meeting at the summit, a private meeting that Trump himself insisted on. Putin’s announcement came a day after his Ambassador to Washington, Anatoly Antonov, said that Trump had made “important verbal agreements” with Putin on arms control and other matters. The Russians, Antonov said, were ready to get moving on implementing them. The White House, meanwhile, has said nothing about what the two men may have agreed to in private...

On Thursday, not long after Putin’s remarks, I spoke with a former senior National Security Council official who has remained in close contact with Trump’s Russia advisers. The official described a bleak scene: the utter lack of process; the failure of the U.S. government to clarify what was even discussed, never mind agreed to, at the meeting; the deep concerns of NATO allies who had spent the previous week believing they had secured Trump’s commitment to their shared agenda of pushing back against Russian aggression. It all seemed almost incomprehensible to anyone with the vaguest sense of how the United States has conducted its foreign policy for generations. “This is no way to run a superpower,” he told me. It’s hard to imagine anyone, Republican or Democrat, who could seriously disagree.


https://www.newyorker.com/news/lett...mmit-and-the-death-of-american-foreign-policy

But, for the rest. What do you think?

I think the final paragraph nails it.
 
Trump should have started a nuclear war with Russia .Lets bomb the hell out of each other.Who in their right mind wants peace?
 
So, I take it there will be a contingent here who are fine with this.



But, for the rest. What do you think?

I think the final paragraph nails it.


Do not forget to check under your bed for russians, Oh and if you find them there do not feed them after midnight or give them water.
 
Here is my take on this:

Voters elected Trump to do things differently.
Trump is doing things differently, which is what the voters wanted.

Trump is destroying everything he touches.
That is what the voters wanted.

People are getting what they asked for; destruction.
That is what the voters wanted.
 
Here is my take on this:

Voters elected Trump to do things differently.
Trump is doing things differently, which is what the voters wanted.

Trump is destroying everything he touches.
That is what the voters wanted.

People are getting what they asked for; destruction.
That is what the voters wanted.

A minority of voters.
 
here is my take on this:

Voters elected trump to do things differently.
Trump is doing things differently, which is what the voters wanted.

Trump is destroying everything he touches.
That is what the voters wanted.

People are getting what they asked for; destruction.
That is what the voters wanted.


have you thought about millions of people dont see him has destroying anything
 
Here is my take on this:

Voters elected Trump to do things differently.
Trump is doing things differently, which is what the voters wanted.

Trump is destroying everything he touches.
That is what the voters wanted.

People are getting what they asked for; destruction.
That is what the voters wanted.

Uh no. Trump is not destroying everything. He's trying for peace with Russia.
 
Uh no. Trump is not destroying everything. He's trying for peace with Russia.

but you see, you are wrong.
Trump is destroying the typical operations of government, attempting to do things his way, thus all of the chaos.
Make no mistake, Trump is attempting to destroy whatever came before him that he dislikes.
If you have not realized that yet then you have not been paying attention.

Why don't you tell the 98 Senators that voted to oppose allowing Russia to question US officials that Trump is trying for peace? Haha ..........

https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...livered-rare-unified-rebuke-trump-russia.html
 
Last edited:
POTUS is being propped up by Putin and those in the US who support the Russian agenda to subvert our democracy. POTUS is not trying for "peace" with Russia. He's trying to save his ass.
 
I always wonder if the lunatic left wingers are really this crazy, or do some of them just post stupid **** on here just because they are bored and have nothing better to do. Yes, Trump who has been harder on russia then Obama, is somehow in bed with russia, he really needs russians to launder money,from the only country that everyone is watching him to be in contact with.... Bunch of spy geniuses over here....

Its been a few months now since ive heard trump is racist, can we go back on that? its like we went few months without russian phantom world war 3 fears of all the thin skinned left wingers, onto 3 months of trump is racist to everyone, and now back on the russians are bad hooplah again, the good ole cycle of left wingers, funny to watch, but sad when you find out they actually believe this **** they see on CNN
 
but you see, you are wrong.
Trump is destroying the typical operations of government, attempting to do things his way, thus all of the chaos.
Make no mistake, Trump is attempting to destroy whatever came before him that he dislikes.
If you have not realized that yet then you have not been paying attention.

Why don't you tell the 98 Senators that voted to oppose allowing Russia to question US officials that Trump is trying for peace? Haha ..........

https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...livered-rare-unified-rebuke-trump-russia.html

Ok, where has he destroyed the typical operations of the govt. And what president doesn't want to do it their way?
What is he destroying? Please tell me.
No, its you that doesn't really have a clue.
 
Ok, where has he destroyed the typical operations of the govt. And what president doesn't want to do it their way?
What is he destroying? Please tell me.
No, its you that doesn't really have a clue.

well, you obviously have not been paying attention which is par for the course for TrumPutin supporters.

Here, I did your home work search FOR YOU ................ now, run along and read, if you can ............

https://www.google.com/search?sourc...0i3k1j33i160k1j0i13k1j0i13i30k1.0.CO96RpsPDAM
 
well, you obviously have not been paying attention which is par for the course for TrumPutin supporters.

Here, I did your home work search FOR YOU ................ now, run along and read, if you can ............

https://www.google.com/search?sourc...0i3k1j33i160k1j0i13k1j0i13i30k1.0.CO96RpsPDAM

Ok, my problem here is. Half of them are from obviously liberal websites. Give me something unbiased, b/c of course liberal websites are going to do anti-Trump bull****. Try again.
 
Ok, my problem here is. Half of them are from obviously liberal websites. Give me something unbiased, b/c of course liberal websites are going to do anti-Trump bull****. Try again.

I will throw you a bone: TrumPutin has yet to staff The State Department; why?

Because TrumPutin sees no need for diplomacy. If TrumPutin can run all around the planet having meetings with dictators & authoritarian figures in 'on on one' meetings, bloviating anything & everything he chooses, then WHY would TrumPutin need a fully staffed State Department?

Like I said, you and many other TrumPutins are not doing your own home work = lazy ............
 
I will throw you a bone: TrumPutin has yet to staff The State Department; why?

Because TrumPutin sees no need for diplomacy. If TrumPutin can run all around the planet having meetings with dictators & authoritarian figures in 'on on one' meetings, bloviating anything & everything he chooses, then WHY would TrumPutin need a fully staffed State Department?

Like I said, you and many other TrumPutins are not doing your own home work = lazy ............

:lamo Whatever, conspiracy theorist
 
Back
Top Bottom