• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Top DOJ Official Defends New Memorandum on Targeting Parents

Again -- ????? Is what that redheaded lady was doing illegal? Seems you're advocating that the FBI open a file on her and interview her to see why she is doing what she is doing. Do you really think this difference of opinion between parents outside an elementary school rises to the level that requires a Federal investigation by the FBI. Really?
With the other similar incidents, it should be looked into as to what is causing such things.
 
Yelling a nazi salute? How does one "yell" a hand gesture?

By yelling "heil wharever" simultaneously with the nazi gesture. If you want to search about it, see any documentary with real footage of Nazis yelling while they were saluting. You can also find white nationalists like Richard Spencer, yelling "heil Trump" while the audience was delivering Nazi salutes.

Sometimes it is like certain people live in a cave.
 
Ohh, so it does. not count because it was not during a school meeting.
You are .making a ridiculous qualification.
Random incidents of violence should be handled like any other crime by local authorities. Targeting parents who show up at public school board meetings to voice their concerns is intimidation by the Feds.
 
So you support crazy parents threatening school board members for doing their jobs?
Wow.
And you don't support parents having a say in how their children are educated?

The bigger question is why this is a FEDERAL ISSUE? More totalitarianism from the "party of the people", eh?
 
You think school boards are making this stuff up? That the arrests made were phony? You are attempting to do what you just accused me of.

Confrontations over masks, vaccines and how race is taught in schools have many school board members across the U.S. worried for their safety.
Mobs are yelling obscenities and throwing objects. In one district, a protester brandished a flagpole against a school board official. Other cases have included a protester yelling a Nazi salute, arrests for aggravated battery and disorderly conduct, and numerous death threats against public officials.
School board meetings, usually one of the most mundane examples of local democracy in action, have exploded with vitriol across the country in recent months, and school leaders are scared.

That's according to a letter that the National School Boards Association sent this week to President Biden. It's asking for help from federal law enforcement, including the Justice, Education and Homeland Security departments as well as the FBI, saying: "These heinous actions could be the equivalent to a form of domestic terrorism and hate crimes."

https://www.npr.org/sections/back-t...7/school-boards-federal-help-threats-violence


Free speech is now violence according to the Mao crowd.
 
So you were homeschooled?

Can you name a single school board that voted for CTR or that too is just a result of your homeschooled brainwashing?

But at the NEA’s representative assembly, held virtually last week, union delegates passed several measures that explicitly support the use of critical race theory in curriculum and allocated tens of thousands of dollars to those efforts.

 
Random incidents of violence should be handled like any other crime by local authorities. Targeting parents who show up at public school board meetings to voice their concerns is intimidation by the Feds.
Uh, they get "targeted" after they express threats.
 
So you think we need to start cracking down of free speech. Got it.
We need to investigate what is leading up to the threats on others. That can involve investigations into legal activities without any sort of violation of rights.
 
With the other similar incidents, it should be looked into as to what is causing such things.
I can save you a lot of time and trouble., These parents are pissed that the schools are mandating their children wear masks 5-8 hours a day.
 
But at the NEA’s representative assembly, held virtually last week, union delegates passed several measures that explicitly support the use of critical race theory in curriculum and allocated tens of thousands of dollars to those efforts.

So you lied. I am shocked.
 
You attack people verbally all the time on this site. Should we call the FBI to investigate?
Go for it. See how far those investigations go. I'm fine with it because the FBI has investigated me routinely since I was 17.
 
I can save you a lot of time and trouble., These parents are pissed that the schools are mandating their children wear masks 5-8 hours a day.
And they are wrong. Doesn't matter if they are pissed or not. My children wear masks 5-8 hours a day. They have no issue with it.

But in reality, they aren't just going after the school. I showed video of them going after other parents, accusing those other parents of child abuse for having their children wear masks. That is not what you are describing.
 
Random incidents of violence should be handled like any other crime by local authorities. Targeting parents who show up at public school board meetings to voice their concerns is intimidation by the Feds.
They aren't targeting parents who show up to voice concerns. Jesus ****ing Christ, try a touch of honesty in your arguments. It's going against parents employing harassment, threats, and violence.

It is completely possible to voice concerns without resorting to harassment, threats, or violence. May come as a surprise to some, but it's true.
 
Random incidents of violence should be handled like any other crime by local authorities. Targeting parents who show up at public school board meetings to voice their concerns is intimidation by the Feds.
The federal law does not make qualifications based on randomness. Not to.mention that the recent increase of violence by anti-maskers is not a result of some random flunctuation in probability of people committing a crime. And finally, it is obvious that you try now to move the goalposts because if the same event had taken place during a school meeting, you could have still argued that it was a random act of violence. But you did not bring such point before. Instead you tried to question that educators face death threats and assaults by parents.
 
Back
Top Bottom