aquapub
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2005
- Messages
- 7,317
- Reaction score
- 344
- Location
- America (A.K.A., a red state)
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
FinnMacCool said:Stop trying to make it seem like the nazis are innocent.
They were doing that there for the specific reason to provoke violence. It was obviously intended on their part.
Also, those blacks that you mentioned were gang members so generalizing and saying that the "blacks" attacked the police is a bit over the top.
FinnMacCool said:Dude we're talking about ****ing nazis here. This doesn't really require indepth analyis. The nazis, excercising their freedom to do a little racist parade of theirs pissed people off and instigated a riot which is, of course, what they had originally hoped to achieve. Just because the people there went crazy doesn't mean that its their fault cause it would be enough to get me pissed off too.
the Skinheads
FinnMacCool said:Dude we're talking about ****ing nazis here. This doesn't really require indepth analyis. The nazis, excercising their freedom to do a little racist parade of theirs pissed people off and instigated a riot which is, of course, what they had originally hoped to achieve. Just because the people there went crazy doesn't mean that its their fault cause it would be enough to get me pissed off too.
George_Washington said:Bill O'Reilly just got done talking about the riots. He also felt that the blacks in Toledo were stupid as hell for rioting and I firmly agree with him. There were only 14 Nazis there to begin with, sheesh. O'Reilly had on this idiot black leader of this Black Panther group (obviously a white hating group) who thought they had a right to riot. Completely ridiculous.
Thank God we have people like Bill O'Reilly to combat stupid riot situations like this.
Napoleon's Nightingale said:Agreed. It seems that most inner city blacks will use just about anything as an excuse to loot, burn, and attack white people.
Wyldinstinct said:And it seems most ignorant people will use just about anything as an excuse to segregate people by race.
Wyldinstinct said:And it seems most ignorant people will use just about anything as an excuse to segregate people by race.
Napoleon's Nightingale said:Agreed. It seems that most inner city blacks will use just about anything as an excuse to loot, burn, and attack white people.
danarhea said:Yea. Blacks will do anything to start trouble. They will get angry for absolutely no reason at all. I mean, just because a group which supports their elimination comes into their own neighborhood for a rally, is no excuse to be angry at them. After all, historically, the Nazis have always loved the blacks just as much as members of their own family. Right? Give it a rest. I would not have felt bad for the Nazis if some of them had been shot in the process of spewing their hatred towards non-whites.
Oh wait, what you are really saying is that the Nazis have a Constitutional right to demonstrate wherever they wish, right? OK, then lets let them demonstrate in Skokie Illinois, where there are residents still alive who remember Hitler's ovens. Would that satisfy you?
Or how about this? The Constitution does not give anyone a right to shout "fire" in a crowded theater, or to go into a neighborhood in which they do NOT even live, knowing damn well that their presence there could possibly cause a riot. Whoever granted the Nazis the permit is a lunatic.
danarhea said:Yea. Blacks will do anything to start trouble. They will get angry for absolutely no reason at all. I mean, just because a group which supports their elimination comes into their own neighborhood for a rally, is no excuse to be angry at them. After all, historically, the Nazis have always loved the blacks just as much as members of their own family. Right? Give it a rest. I would not have felt bad for the Nazis if some of them had been shot in the process of spewing their hatred towards non-whites.
danarhea said:Oh wait, what you are really saying is that the Nazis have a Constitutional right to demonstrate wherever they wish, right? OK, then lets let them demonstrate in Skokie Illinois, where there are residents still alive who remember Hitler's ovens. Would that satisfy you?
danarhea said:Or how about this? The Constitution does not give anyone a right to shout "fire" in a crowded theater, or to go into a neighborhood in which they do NOT even live, knowing damn well that their presence there could possibly cause a riot. Whoever granted the Nazis the permit is a lunatic.
danarhea said:Whoever granted the Nazis the permit is a lunatic.
FinnMacCool said:Dude we're talking about ****ing nazis here. This doesn't really require indepth analyis. The nazis, excercising their freedom to do a little racist parade of theirs pissed people off and instigated a riot which is, of course, what they had originally hoped to achieve. Just because the people there went crazy doesn't mean that its their fault cause it would be enough to get me pissed off too.
Wyldinstinct said::agree well said, Finn
Yeah. Pretty messed-up thing to say "blacks there chose to get violent". Maybe gang members chose to get violent, but don't go generalizing blacks. There are plenty 'o white folks in gangs in gangs, and who could forget those wacky Yakuza?
Wyldinstinct said:And it seems most ignorant people will use just about anything as an excuse to segregate people by race.
FinnMacCool said:Dude we're talking about ****ing nazis here. This doesn't really require indepth analyis. The nazis, excercising their freedom to do a little racist parade of theirs pissed people off and instigated a riot which is, of course, what they had originally hoped to achieve. Just because the people there went crazy doesn't mean that its their fault cause it would be enough to get me pissed off too.
Stinger said:Welcome to the forum PR!
Wyldinstinct said:And it seems most ignorant people will use just about anything as an excuse to segregate people by race.
debate_junkie said:Ok, ok, let's take all of these comments in context. First generalizing a race of people, based on the actions of 600, is not right. BUT, when the members of this 600+ race choose not to speak against the actions of said 600, wouldn't their silence be condoning such behavior? I can see how many people viewing this would become insensed enough to generalize when people within that said community are verbally condoning, and silently condoning the action.
Now, having said that. Some on this thread want me to believe that the 600+ that rioted were provoked by the Nazi's. Which begs me to ask this question, when Los Angeles burned, who provoked them? You can't tell me that a verdict in a courtroom was justifiable provocation for a city to burn. I do wait response to this question.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?