• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tokyo begins same-sex partnership recognition

The law does not declare marriage a private matter, in fact the very fact there is a large body of nuptial law stems from the fact it is a public matter
BOOM! nothing you posted changes the reality that your statement below

In any event this is not a “private Lives” matter, marriage is a public institution and not a private one
is not fact.

one again facts reality and law disagree with you and the retarded lies and wittle fweeelings you post go down in flames again for all to see

Fact remains:
in america marriage is a private contract, a legal union between parties
😁 🍿


 
Marriage is not public.
Yeah it is. That’s the entire purpose. That’s why witnesses are required, the record is public, etc
And you have to either allow committed gay couples the same advantages around taxes and stuff as straight couples
No you don’t. Marriage is not the same thing as sodomy, one is good and for the raising of children and the other is an inversion, a selfish celebration of disordered sexual practice. There is no need to be equal because these things are not the same
or you have to remove the advantages.
No, you don’t.
 
Yeah it is. That’s the entire purpose. That’s why witnesses are required, the record is public, etc

No you don’t. Marriage is not the same thing as sodomy, one is good and for the raising of children and the other is an inversion, a selfish celebration of disordered sexual practice. There is no need to be equal because these things are not the same

No, you don’t.
Legislating moraty. Must be that small government, no interference conservative philosophy speaking.

"The State has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre E. Trudeau-
 
That’s why witnesses are required, the record is public, etc
factually wrong again witnesses are NOT required for all LEGAL marriages nor is it the the purpose of a witness 🤦‍♂️
do you try to make your posts look this stupid or is it just a bonus for the rest of us?
😂🍿


 
No you don’t. Marriage is not the same thing as sodomy, one is good and for the raising of children and the other is an inversion, a selfish celebration of disordered sexual practice. There is no need to be equal because these things are not the same
a same sex marriage is identical to an opposite sex marriage. They are quite demonstrably, the same.
 
a same sex marriage is identical to an opposite sex marriage.
No, they are not. The reason you have to use different qualifiers to describe them means they’re not the same.
They are quite demonstrably, the same.
No, they’re not. Two people of the same sex are incapable of engaging in properly ordered sex.
 
No, they are not. The reason you have to use different qualifiers to describe them means they’re not the same.
100% factually wrong again
people use black and white, jewish and Christian guess what still HUMAN

just like gays and straight say they are MARRIED, that qualifies existing doesn't mean they are not the same, the legal contract/license is the same

wow once again you retarded bigoted claims get the shit kicked out of them LMAO
No, they’re not. Two people of the same sex are incapable of engaging in properly ordered sex.
BWHAHAHAHA serious . . are you trying to make your posts look this stupid and factually wrong?

sex is not needed for marriage nor does your subjective feelings about it matter one bit
man this is fun what an epic beat down your moronic posts are taking . . quick make another failed comment we can mock for its stupidity
:ROFLMAO: 🍿
 
No, they are not.
They demonstrably are.
The reason you have to use different qualifiers to describe them means they’re not the same.
I didn't use a different qualifier. I'm describing the sex of the persons involved. The marriage itself is objectively identical.
No, they’re not.
They demonstrably are.
Two people of the same sex are incapable of engaging in properly ordered sex.
What you find proper is meaningless. A large percentage of opposite sex couples engage in the same type of sex. But having sex is irrelevant to marriage. Having sex is not a requirement of marriage. It remains objectively true that a same sex and opposite sex couple are identically married.
 
They demonstrably are.

I didn't use a different qualifier. I'm describing the sex of the persons involved. The marriage itself is objectively identical.
No, it’s not. Two men engaging in sodomy can never produce offspring
They demonstrably are.
No, they’re not
What you find proper is meaningless. A large percentage of opposite sex couples engage in the same type of sex.
As true as that may be, although probably not as prevalent as you think, that is not an argument refuting that two people of the same sex are only capable of engaging in disordered sex.
But having sex is irrelevant to marriage.
Wrong
Having sex is not a requirement of marriage.
It largely is, and many countries still allow annulment on the grounds of non consummation. Sex and marriage are culturally and historically linked
It remains objectively true that a same sex and opposite sex couple are identically married.
No, they are not. There is no objective standard By which two men engaging in sodomy are identical to a man and a woman engaging in intercourse, so there is no reason to provide sanction for the former
 
No, it’s not.
Yes, it demonstrably is.
Two men engaging in sodomy can never produce offspring
Offspring are completely irrelevant to marriage. Almost every opposite sex couple engages in sodomy.
No, they’re not
Yes, they quite demonstrably are.
As true as that may be, although probably not as prevalent as you think, that is not an argument refuting that two people of the same sex are only capable of engaging in disordered sex.
What you find disordered is meaningless.
Demonstrably and objectively correct.
It largely is,
It in no way is.
and many countries still allow annulment on the grounds of non consummation.
If the couple seeks one, on the basis of no sex. Sex is not a requirement of marriage.
Sex and marriage are culturally and historically linked
Nope. There is no requirement at all, for sex in marriage.
No, they are not.
Yes, they demonstrably are.
There is no objective standard By which two men engaging in sodomy are identical to a man and a woman engaging in intercourse, so there is no reason to provide sanction for the former
Again, what you find sexually moral is completely meaningless. Sex is not in any way required for marriage, whether it be traditional intercourse or sodomy (which almost every single opposite sex couple engages in). Nobody cares what you"sanction". you don't have any say in the matter, at all.

The facts remain. Opposite sex couples are identically married, as same sex couples. This is objectively and demonstrably true.
 
Says the guy that thinks a husband raping his wife is acceptable behavior, and not rape.
Yeah, really puts all POVs into question.
The law does not declare marriage a private matter, in fact the very fact there is a large body of nuptial law stems from the fact it is a public matter
"weddings" can be public events. Marriage is a private legal matter.
That’s why witnesses are required, the record is public, etc
Sales are also noted in public record. Doesn't make them a public matter. The contract is between party A and party B.
Marriage is not the same thing as sodomy, one is good and for the raising of children and the other is an inversion, a selfish celebration of disordered sexual practice. There is no need to be equal because these things are not the same
The number of "heterosexual" married couples that abuse their children would be proof that you are wrong.
The reason you have to use different qualifiers to describe them means they’re not the same.
You seem to be the only one having an issue with calling both marriage.
Two people of the same sex are incapable of engaging in properly ordered sex.
what is "properly ordered sex". They handing out some sort of "sex for dummies" books now where you check off 1, 2, 3 in order and you get a gold star?
Two men engaging in sodomy can never produce offspring
Sure they can, via an egg donor and surrogate. Penis in vagina sex is not necessary in order to create babies in the year 2022.
Sex and marriage are culturally and historically linked
And? That means absolutely zero from a legal standpoint.
There is no objective standard By which two men engaging in sodomy are identical to a man and a woman engaging in intercourse, so there is no reason to provide sanction for the former
Men and women engage in "sodomy" also. There is a world outside of vanilla missionary sex. Or did you not know this?
 
Cool.

Had no idea Tokyo was so backwards that they didn't do this already.
 
“Moraty”?

🙄

Who cares what whoever that guy is said?
Morality. Fine. I've got big clumsy fingers that used big violent tools for years. But I dont mind it being pointed out by people with more delicate backgrounds.
And you dont have to care about that guy saying something, its what he said that matters. I abandonded any loyalty to that guy after his first term. It's what he said that counts, which is a difficult thing for a conservative to wrap his head around. The actual fact, the indisputable truth, the whole frigging point is that the State has in fact no place in the bedrooms of the nation. Thats a fundamental liberal principal. I'm not surprised at all that someone who identifies as very conservative would dispute that principal. Very conservative people probably (I dont know any so Im guessing) probably believe the State does so need to have a presence in the bedrooms of the nation.
But liberalism being about the rights and freedoms of the individuals, gay people in liberal democracies dont suffer like gay people in, say, Iran. You know Iran, one of the most conservative societies on earth. Its where good conservatives go when they die. Laws based on scripture, liberalism suppressed, women in traditional roles, gays illegal and executed, its like a conservtive heaven on earth.
 
Cool.

Had no idea Tokyo was so backwards that they didn't do this already.
Asia. And Muslim countries. Its like the death penalty, its an Asian and Muslim thing.

edit Giving it more thought I realize that its about obedience. Asian obedience to authority, Muslim and fundamentalist Christian obedience to scripture. Everywhere else in the world hasnt got that much invested in obedience to authority.
 
Cool.

Had no idea Tokyo was so backwards that they didn't do this already.
Japan is a very ahhh traditionalist country and rather strict as well socially. I know hard to imagine with all the friggen cool anime out there. There is still racism against koreans that were brought up in Japan because of the imperialist days.
 
Asia. And Muslim countries. Its like the death penalty, its an Asian and Muslim thing.

edit Giving it more thought I realize that its about obedience. Asian obedience to authority, Muslim and fundamentalist Christian obedience to scripture. Everywhere else in the world hasnt got that much invested in obedience to authority.
So just a majority of the population of the planet is backwards, huh?

Progress is slow. Here's hoping they catch up.
 
Back
Top Bottom