To all Libs saying Iraqis don't want us there

[Caine]

So if I have a different opinion then you, I am wrong and have a closed mind, and you are free thinker...:rofl

This is correct, because im looking at it logically, you've already made up your mind.

So if I have a different opinion then you, I am wrong and have a closed mind, and you are free thinker...:rofl

Nope, but you have coped nearly from the book the exacty words of Hannity when he brought this up on his show.

I NEVER cursed you out in any thread, thats a stone cold flay out lie... Typical.

Yes, you did, just because you replace the proper spelling by taking out the C doesn't mean your not cursing someone out outside of the basement.

I am not angry, I do however get annoyed when Someone tries to tell me what I know and don't know, do and don't do.Your post are typical liberal writings, them maming sense is very unlikely

This is what makes you not a free thinker, just because I am a liberal my posts don't make sense? :rofl

I make NO threats to anyone that I am not willing to stand up in there face and say.

Thats not the point, your not supposed to curse and threaten people outside of the basement.

And I rarely start on anyone unless I feel they started on me first...

What goes on in the basement stays in the basement.

AGAIN ... I never cursed you out

Again, you are wrong... lets see.... you've said.....

You have the time, balls or inclination you can come on down and test my skill at war or feeding you that fukn boot. Feel free to bring your A game.

Okay... that was cursing and threatening me, and this isnt the basement.

AND if ignore is what y agotta do then you should do what makes ya feel good

Shouldn't have to, but if you can't remain civil when posting outside of the basement then I will.

 

[Calm2Chaos]

This is correct, because im looking at it logically, you've already made up your mind.



Nope, but you have coped nearly from the book the exacty words of Hannity when he brought this up on his show.



Yes, you did, just because you replace the proper spelling by taking out the C doesn't mean your not cursing someone out outside of the basement.

This is what makes you not a free thinker, just because I am a liberal my posts don't make sense? :rofl

Thats not the point, your not supposed to curse and threaten people outside of the basement.
What goes on in the basement stays in the basement.

Again, you are wrong... lets see.... you've said..... Okay... that was cursing and threatening me, and this isnt the basement.

Shouldn't have to, but if you can't remain civil when posting outside of the basement then I will.

You threatened to kick my ass with it or some such ****, thus I responded to that. Then I brought it up again because of the arrogant ass comment you made.

I am not going to explain myself anymore to you.
I agree with you. Ignore is probably your best bet. Makes finding people that agree with you a lot easier....LOL
And me spelling the word fuk does not constitute me cursing you out. I think maybe you need to get a little thicker skin. Whatever....

 

[Caine]

You threatened to kick my ass with it or some such ****, thus I responded to that. Then I brought it up again because of the arrogant ass comment you made.

Thus, it remains in the basement, don't bring it out here because you can't handle it in the basement.

I am not going to explain myself anymore to you.
I agree with you. Ignore is probably your best bet. Makes finding people that agree with you a lot easier....LOL
And me spelling the word fuk does not constitute me cursing you out. I think maybe you need to get a little thicker skin. Whatever....

I dont mind finding people who disagree with me, as long as they can discuss the situation with a clear head, and not bringing a Hannity and Coulter mentality into the mix. I will have plenty of thick skin, IN THE BASEMENT. The other crap you talk doesn't belong out here.

 

[Calm2Chaos]

Thus, it remains in the basement, don't bring it out here because you can't handle it in the basement.

I can handle you in any forum whatsoever. Your pretty predictable...LOL


I dont mind finding people who disagree with me, as long as they can discuss the situation with a clear head, and not bringing a Hannity and Coulter mentality into the mix. I will have plenty of thick skin, IN THE BASEMENT. The other crap you talk doesn't belong out here.

I have my opinion .. It doesn't agree with yours so you assume it to be wrong or someone elses. And for this you claim to be a free thinker. WOW .. Thats what your calling free thinking now adays??

And I will bring my "Crap" out anytime I like. If you don't like it don't respond, if you can't handle it don't respond, if you don't want it, don't threaten me and try not to be so arrogant.

Once again I don't think like you free thinker, so I must be wrong. Shall we get back on topic, or continue this boring azz line of back and forth bickering... See I cursed there, but it wasn't cursing you out.... See the difference? Up to you.. I can go either way all day....

 

[argexpat]

http://www.fair.org/press-releases/iraq-democracy-polls.html

"Despite growing calls from within the foreign policy establishment for a reconsideration of the U.S. military presence in Iraq, most mainstream pundits and commentators continue to argue that the U.S. has no choice but to tough it out. According to a survey of editorial opinion by Editor & Publisher (5/7/04), the trade publication of the newspaper industry, "the vast majority of America's large newspapers favored this approach to Iraq: Stay the course."

But with resistance to the U.S.-led occupation forces showing no signs of fading away, some journalists have cast a worried glance at Iraqi public opinion. Establishing a democratic government responsive to popular wishes is the main rationale for keeping U.S. soldiers in Iraq. So if ordinary Iraqis reject the coalition's continued military presence, defending the mission becomes an increasingly awkward task.

In recent weeks, two important scientific polls of Iraqi opinion have been published, and neither offered much solace for those who support staying the course. A Gallup poll conducted mostly in late March-- before the recent sieges of Fallujah and Najaf-- showed that "a solid majority support an immediate military pullout." (http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-04-28-poll-cover_x.htm). Fifty-seven percent said the coalition should "leave immediately" rather than "stay longer" (36 percent).

Among respondents in Shi'ite and Sunni Arab areas-- that is, leaving out Kurdish respondents-- the numbers favoring an immediate pullout were even higher: 61 percent to 30 percent among Shi'ites and 65 percent to 27 percent among Sunnis. In Baghdad, where U.S. forces are concentrated, the numbers were highest of all: 75 percent favored an immediate pullout, with only 21 percent opposed."

P.S. Maybe more "good news" would be coming out of Iraq if reporters weren't afraid of getting their heads blown off.

P.P.S. Please define "libs."

 

[Calm2Chaos]

http://www.fair.org/press-releases/iraq-democracy-polls.html

"Despite growing calls from within the foreign policy establishment for a reconsideration of the U.S. military presence in Iraq, most mainstream pundits and commentators continue to argue that the U.S. has no choice but to tough it out. According to a survey of editorial opinion by Editor & Publisher (5/7/04), the trade publication of the newspaper industry, "the vast majority of America's large newspapers favored this approach to Iraq: Stay the course."

But with resistance to the U.S.-led occupation forces showing no signs of fading away, some journalists have cast a worried glance at Iraqi public opinion. Establishing a democratic government responsive to popular wishes is the main rationale for keeping U.S. soldiers in Iraq. So if ordinary Iraqis reject the coalition's continued military presence, defending the mission becomes an increasingly awkward task.

In recent weeks, two important scientific polls of Iraqi opinion have been published, and neither offered much solace for those who support staying the course. A Gallup poll conducted mostly in late March-- before the recent sieges of Fallujah and Najaf-- showed that "a solid majority support an immediate military pullout." (http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-04-28-poll-cover_x.htm). Fifty-seven percent said the coalition should "leave immediately" rather than "stay longer" (36 percent).

Among respondents in Shi'ite and Sunni Arab areas-- that is, leaving out Kurdish respondents-- the numbers favoring an immediate pullout were even higher: 61 percent to 30 percent among Shi'ites and 65 percent to 27 percent among Sunnis. In Baghdad, where U.S. forces are concentrated, the numbers were highest of all: 75 percent favored an immediate pullout, with only 21 percent opposed."

P.S. Maybe more "good news" would be coming out of Iraq if reporters weren't afraid of getting their heads blown off.

P.P.S. Please define "libs."

When was this poll done? couldn't get the link to work

 

[Tashah]

[Moderator Mode]

Calm2Chaos and Caine... this is an initial friendly warning. Keep the smack-talk in the Basement where it belongs.

[/Moderator Mode]

 

[Billo_Really]

They might want us there, if we would stop bombing their damn hospitals! This is getting ridiculous. We are destroying that country. And we are destroying ours just by being there.


http://www.ivaw.net/index.php?id=169

 

[scottyz]

Iraqis support killing British and U.S. troops

Millions of Iraqis believe that suicide attacks against British troops are justified, a secret military poll commissioned by senior officers has revealed.

The poll, undertaken for the Ministry of Defence and seen by The Sunday Telegraph, shows that up to 65 per cent of Iraqi citizens support attacks and fewer than one per cent think Allied military involvement is helping to improve security in their country.

It demonstrates for the first time the true strength of anti-Western feeling in Iraq after more than two and a half years of bloody occupation.

The nationwide survey also suggests that the coalition has lost the battle to win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people, which Tony Blair and George W Bush believed was fundamental to creating a safe and secure country.

The results come as it was disclosed yesterday that Lt Col Nick Henderson, the commanding officer of the Coldstream Guards in Basra, in charge of security for the region, has resigned from the Army. He recently voiced concerns over a lack of armoured vehicles for his men, another of whom was killed in a bomb attack in Basra last week

The Sunday Telegraph disclosed last month that a plan for an early withdrawal of British troops had been shelved because of the failing security situation, sparking claims that Iraq was rapidly becoming "Britain's own Vietnam".

The survey was conducted by an Iraqi university research team that, for security reasons, was not told the data it compiled would be used by coalition forces. It reveals:

• Forty-five per cent of Iraqis believe attacks against British and American troops are justified - rising to 65 per cent in the British-controlled Maysan province;

• 82 per cent are "strongly opposed" to the presence of coalition troops;

• less than one per cent of the population believes coalition forces are responsible for any improvement in security;

• 67 per cent of Iraqis feel less secure because of the occupation;

• 43 per cent of Iraqis believe conditions for peace and stability have worsened;

• 72 per cent do not have confidence in the multi-national forces.

The opinion poll, carried out in August, also debunks claims by both the US and British governments that the general well-being of the average Iraqi is improving in post-Saddam Iraq.

http://telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/10/23/wirq23.xml&sSheet=/portal/2005/10/23/ixportaltop.html