• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tim Walz

You really are desperate. You're like a cornered rat who just lashes out at anything. Both of those clips showed her making a valid point in a dramatic way. To say she was intoxicated, no matter what some MAGA Trump supporters may have said, is ludicrous. You can criticize her delivery; perhaps she can improve her delivery, but these scurrilous, absurd accusations that she was intoxicated are just beneath contempt.
No No. Not the intoxicated stuff.
I asked you for YOUR impression. Not someone else's impression.
Having seen both videos, what was YOUR impression?
Nothing struck you? Nothing made you go hmmmm? Nothing curious about what you saw.
Remember, we're talking about ,la's ability to show spontaneity, genuineness, an ability to be deliver more than "unscripted boilerplate bromides"?
Did those videos show that to you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PoS
No No. Not the intoxicated stuff.
I asked you for YOUR impression. Not someone else's impression.
Having seen both videos, what was YOUR impression?
Nothing struck you? Nothing made you go hmmmm? Nothing curious about what you saw.
Remember, we're talking about ,la's ability to show spontaneity, genuineness, an ability to be deliver more than "unscripted boilerplate bromides"?
Did those videos show that to you?
She, like all politicians of every stripe, has certain phrases she likes to repeat. If that's your main criticism, she is obviously really good. I do find it interesting, and quite telling, that you're walking back the "intoxicated stuff."
 
She, like all politicians of every stripe, has certain phrases she likes to repeat. If that's your main criticism, she is obviously really good. I do find it interesting, and quite telling, that you're walking back the "intoxicated stuff."
"Intoxicated" came with the X posts. Not me. It's probably not Vodka that she relies on.
The lesson here is that both Timpon and ,la will look like empty suits without memorized or TP assistance.
The Convention is loaded with faux joy and substance-free for a reason.
In the videos before and after the coup, she repeated the entire thing, nasally, not just phrases, word-for-word, even with the same hand gestures at the same moments.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised you didn't pick up on it. Very obvious.
Whenever she will be asked anything, assuming she allows it, she will regurgitate something she had to memorize as a response or risk one of her embarrassing ramblings.
“So I think it’s very important — as you have heard from so many incredible leaders — for us, at every moment in time, and certainly this one, to see the moment in time in which we exist and are present, and to be able to contextualize it, to understand where we exist in the history and in the moment as it relates not only to the past, but the future.”
She must've told herself such pseudo-intellectual claptrap impresses easily influenced people.
Nowhere near as slick as Barack. She just ain't capable of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PoS
The fear of Trumpets is palpable (means, "you can feel it", for the less-encumbered-by-education). To describe their bleatings as "weak sauce" would be to denigrate sauce. They're trying so hard to wear the emperor's clothes, but they're only exposing themselves.
 
Wrong. Impeachment occurs when Senate votes it in.
Impeachment is the act of the majority of House Members saying that the official committed an unconstitutional act of high crimes, misdemeanors, treason or bribery. Conviction of the same is done by the Senate. If both occur, the officer is removed from office. See U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 4. Although the Constitution does not specify which house does what, that is how the Congress operates and rules it has followed whenever the circumstances arise.
 
Walz is also a grade A Blue Falcon.

Rich coming from the camp that mastered it, even made it a TV show that acts as a blueprint if you follow the business outcomes to their universal conclusions.
 
Army Infantry Lt.Col. retired Alexander Vindman was wounded in action in Iraq. Awarded the Purple Heart he completed his tour, receiving two awards of the Combat Infantryman Badge. Due to his wounds Vindman became an Army Civil-Political Affairs Officer and served as military attache to the US Embassy in Moscow and in Kyiv Ukraine. He became principal advisor on Russia to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. Vindman became the representative on the WH National Security Staff of the Chairman JCS.

Vindman has a master's degree in Russian Studies from Harvard and is a graduate of Binghampton University Army ROTC in NY state. He and his twin brother Army Colonel Yevgeny were born in Ukraine and arrived in NYC as children.

Vindman’s awards include the Purple Heart, Defense Meritorious Service Medal (2nd award), Meritorious Service Medal, Army Commendation Medal (4th award), Army Achievement Medal (3rd award), National Defense Service Medal , Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Korean Defense Service Medal, Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon (4th award), Valorous Unit Award, National Intelligence Meritorious Unit Citation, Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation, Presidential Service Badge, Joint Chiefs of Staff identification Badge, and Navy Unit Commendation.

In other words, a sucker and a loser. [sarc]
I wonder who is going to write to his family saying "Here, right does NOT matter" if Trump wins.

1724269049370.webp
 
Impeachment is the act of the majority of House Members saying that the official committed an unconstitutional act of high crimes, misdemeanors, treason or bribery. Conviction of the same is done by the Senate. If both occur, the officer is removed from office. See U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 4. Although the Constitution does not specify which house does what, that is how the Congress operates and rules it has followed whenever the circumstances arise.
Yep. the House delivers Articales of Impeachment and the Senate, if the Senate does actually impeach, e.g. find guilty, the person every thing goes away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PoS
Yep. the House delivers Articales of Impeachment and the Senate, if the Senate does actually impeach, e.g. find guilty, the person every thing goes away.
No, impeach does NOT mean find guilty. Impeachment and conviction are two separate things. The Constitution says, "The President . . .shall be removed from Office, on Impeachment for and Conviction of, . . ."
 
No, impeach does NOT mean find guilty. Impeachment and conviction are two separate things. The Constitution says, "The President . . .shall be removed from Office, on Impeachment for and Conviction of, . . ."
My point exactly.
 
No, impeach does NOT mean find guilty. Impeachment and conviction are two separate things. The Constitution says, "The President . . .shall be removed from Office, on Impeachment for and Conviction of, . . ."
Believe what you want.
 
"Intoxicated" came with the X posts. Not me. It's probably not Vodka that she relies on.
The lesson here is that both Timpon and ,la will look like empty suits without memorized or TP assistance.
The Convention is loaded with faux joy and substance-free for a reason.
In the videos before and after the coup, she repeated the entire thing, nasally, not just phrases, word-for-word, even with the same hand gestures at the same moments.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised you didn't pick up on it. Very obvious.
Whenever she will be asked anything, assuming she allows it, she will regurgitate something she had to memorize as a response or risk one of her embarrassing ramblings.

She must've told herself such pseudo-intellectual claptrap impresses easily influenced people.
Nowhere near as slick as Barack. She just ain't capable of it.
Bubba, it's sad to see you falling apart like this. Terms like "Timpon" and ",la" are not worthy of adults. Every politician repeats themselves, but because there is so little negative about Harris and Walz, you have to scrape the bottom of the barrel by pretending to be outraged at such behavior. Your performance here is pitiful and worthy only of scorn.
 
Bubba, it's sad to see you falling apart like this. Terms like "Timpon" and ",la" are not worthy of adults. Every politician repeats themselves, but because there is so little negative about Harris and Walz, you have to scrape the bottom of the barrel by pretending to be outraged at such behavior. Your performance here is pitiful and worthy only of scorn.
You gotta learn to pronounce names properly. They really get mad about that for some reason so I help you guys out when I can.

Someone might think avoiding the point like you keep doing is what's worthy of scorn.

Anyway ... After seeing the nasty angry version of Walz last night I have to take prescient credit for something from last Saturday https://debatepolitics.com/threads/...es-the-election.547380/page-8#post-1080164830... #190
1724341217009.webp



I know, you admire how well I know Lefties and you wish you could admit it. I understand.

Let's face it, They're both actors and they're not very good at it.
The whole "joy" campaign theme was tailored around ,la's intensely fake perpetually plastered on toothy smile and evil cackling since she had to jettison all her previous insane un-American positions.
Timpon has to jump around on stage to do his happy part. We saw the nasty Timpon last night too and I suspect ,la will deliver a mix tonight too.
But the lying from the entire convention speaker coterie is both gutsy and breathtaking.

Obama is still very good at the act but he's been at it so long it's not as impactful as it used to be.
,la was never going to be as good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PoS
So, I hear that CSM (RET) Walz is requesting a CIB now that he has finally deployed to the a combat zone (Chiraq).
 
You gotta learn to pronounce names properly. They really get mad about that for some reason so I help you guys out when I can.

Someone might think avoiding the point like you keep doing is what's worthy of scorn.

Anyway ... After seeing the nasty angry version of Walz last night I have to take prescient credit for something from last Saturday https://debatepolitics.com/threads/...es-the-election.547380/page-8#post-1080164830... #190
View attachment 67528050



I know, you admire how well I know Lefties and you wish you could admit it. I understand.

Let's face it, They're both actors and they're not very good at it.
The whole "joy" campaign theme was tailored around ,la's intensely fake perpetually plastered on toothy smile and evil cackling since she had to jettison all her previous insane un-American positions.
Timpon has to jump around on stage to do his happy part. We saw the nasty Timpon last night too and I suspect ,la will deliver a mix tonight too.
But the lying from the entire convention speaker coterie is both gutsy and breathtaking.

Obama is still very good at the act but he's been at it so long it's not as impactful as it used to be.
,la was never going to be as good.
Bubba, you really are a sad little man.
 
Back
Top Bottom