I mean, there was this one:Oh, you're a clever one! You think that if you can show a handful of disputed ballots out of millions that somehow that justifies disenfranchising millions of voters.
Go ahead, show us the evidence. I dare you.
What part of "demonstrate" confuses you? Sea lioning doesn't demonstrate a problem.how do you know every ballot was filled out by or approved by the person who the ballot was intended??
The bipartisan State Election Board unanimously voted to call for a new election for the 9th district, because of ballot fraud by Republican operatives.I mean, there was this one:
State Board unanimously orders new election in 9th Congressional District
The State Board of Elections on Thursday unanimously ordered a new election in North Carolina’s 9th Congressional District and two local contests in Bladen County.www.ncsbe.gov
(…oh wait, it was because of his own party…)
How do I know that every time I vote and hit the button or run the Scantron through the machine, my vote was cast the way it was supposed to be? I mean, how do I know that the letter I mail at the post office will actually go to the company it's intended for?how do you know every ballot was filled out by or approved by the person who the ballot was intended??
PreciselyThe bipartisan State Election Board unanimously voted to call for a new election for the 9th district, because of ballot fraud by Republican operatives.
And even that did not make a difference. The Republican won the new election, just like Republicans have since 1963.
Next!
DeJoy is a sabotaging Trump hack and traitor, as we saw in 2020 with mail-in voting and reapportionment.play stupid games win stupid prizes,,
to trust the post office with one of the most important actions taken by the average american is plain stupid
next time show up in person and vote like normal people do,,
this is a good ruling and hopefully it leads to ending ,mail in ballots,,
I literally didnt,,You've literally argued against BOTH in this very thread!
I never said anything of the kind,,Oh, you're a clever one! You think that if you can show a handful of disputed ballots out of millions that somehow that justifies disenfranchising millions of voters.
Go ahead, show us the evidence. I dare you.
Ah, so that's your real issue. You think mail-in ballots make it easier to commit fraud on a scale that would change election results. This has not proved to be an issue so far.that is if your goal is a free and fair election,,
As openly stated by Trump and other republicans, they don’t like large turnout. Fewer voters enhance GOP chances to win. So since the Supremes decision on the Voting Rights Act, we have seen a full court press on access to the polls.What do you think its purpose is?
I literally didnt,,
youre dismissed,,
If you have examples, post them; otherwise, you're just trolling.NO ONE??
are you absolutely sure about that??
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?