- Joined
- Aug 3, 2018
- Messages
- 34,752
- Reaction score
- 3,961
- Location
- north carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
We are showing in countries that Covid related deaths are probably under-reported. Frankly, the estimation can go up or down at this point, but that will be a question for statisticians after this is over. As it stands right now, protocols for counting cause of death probably still need to be revised for accuracy in all countries.
Uncounted among coronavirus victims, deaths sweep through Italy's nursing homes - Reuters
The numbers also show that over 40% of the cases in this country are in the liberal state of NY with 67,000 reported. Why is it that the liberal states of NY, NJ, Washington, California lead the nation and are the first to blame the President for his reaction to divert from their own? It is interesting how big gov't liberals looking for a massive central gov't ignore the state and local responsibilities being handled in the bluest states in the nation. Placing blame is the hallmark of the liberal ideology never accepting responsibility
As testing becomes more widely available, the number of those infected continues to rise rapidly. But what is the real story here that is under-reported? That as numbers of those infected skyrockets the number of those dying is not skyrocketing. There is one major takeaway from the numbers. The percentage of those infected from the disease who die from the disease is falling. We are now looking at the real possibility that maybe less than 1% of those infected with the virus end up dying from the virus. That seems to support the notion that panicking over the virus is totally out of order.
What is the percentage of those who were infected but lived have been left with some respiratory damage?
As testing becomes more widely available, the number of those infected continues to rise rapidly. But what is the real story here that is under-reported? That as numbers of those infected skyrockets the number of those dying is not skyrocketing. There is one major takeaway from the numbers. The percentage of those infected from the disease who die from the disease is falling. We are now looking at the real possibility that maybe less than 1% of those infected with the virus end up dying from the virus. That seems to support the notion that panicking over the virus is totally out of order.
What is the percentage of those who were infected but lived have been left with some respiratory damage?
Yes, epidemics tend to start in places with more economic activity, international trade, ports, and cities. Thank you for pointing out the obvious.
In countries where the curve is bending best tend to have had a centralized response. Look at S. Korea and other EMEA locations for good examples.
As testing becomes more widely available, the number of those infected continues to rise rapidly. But what is the real story here that is under-reported? That as numbers of those infected skyrockets the number of those dying is not skyrocketing. There is one major takeaway from the numbers. The percentage of those infected from the disease who die from the disease is falling. We are now looking at the real possibility that maybe less than 1% of those infected with the virus end up dying from the virus. That seems to support the notion that panicking over the virus is totally out of order.
Couple of points, while more testing is a good thing, especially if it shows there are far more infections than we knew. Thing is with deaths many of those that will get it and die may not already have been infected. The experts are saying that if we follow the guidelines the peek in infections and deaths will come in April that means we are still just guessing at infection and death rates.
No, folks this is not the flu not is it something to take lightly, to do so does not only put you in danger it also puts those you love and those you intereact with in danger. Follow the guidelines
Unfortunately, there's plenty of idiots still not taking it seriously.
Couple of points, while more testing is a good thing, especially if it shows there are far more infections than we knew. Thing is with deaths many of those that will get it and die may not already have been infected. The experts are saying that if we follow the guidelines the peek in infections and deaths will come in April that means we are still just guessing at infection and death rates.
No, folks this is not the flu not is it something to take lightly, to do so does not only put you in danger it also puts those you love and those you intereact with in danger. Follow the guidelines
The numbers also show that over 40% of the cases in this country are in the liberal state of NY with 67,000 reported. Why is it that the liberal states of NY, NJ, Washington, California lead the nation and are the first to blame the President for his reaction to divert from their own? It is interesting how big gov't liberals looking for a massive central gov't ignore the state and local responsibilities being handled in the bluest states in the nation. Placing blame is the hallmark of the liberal ideology never accepting responsibility
As testing becomes more widely available, the number of those infected continues to rise rapidly. But what is the real story here that is under-reported? That as numbers of those infected skyrockets the number of those dying is not skyrocketing. There is one major takeaway from the numbers. The percentage of those infected from the disease who die from the disease is falling. We are now looking at the real possibility that maybe less than 1% of those infected with the virus end up dying from the virus. That seems to support the notion that panicking over the virus is totally out of order.
Who woulda thunk that the most infected people would be where most people live? Crazy huh? :congrats:
Yes, who would have thunk it, TX is in that population category as is Illinois but keep ignoring the harm people like you are doing to this country as if you give a damn. Keep placing blame and serving no purpose other than divide and create chaos.
So dense population areas spread faster than less dense population areas. It's so amazingly difficult for you to understand. But alas you are on a mission of blame so playing ignorant on the obvious suits your mission.
Unfortunately, there's plenty of idiots still not taking it seriously.
So dense population areas spread faster than less dense population areas. It's so amazingly difficult for you to understand. But alas you are on a mission of blame so playing ignorant on the obvious suits your mission.
The numbers also show that over 40% of the cases in this country are in the liberal state of NY with 67,000 reported. Why is it that the liberal states of NY, NJ, Washington, California lead the nation and are the first to blame the President for his reaction to divert from their own? It is interesting how big gov't liberals looking for a massive central gov't ignore the state and local responsibilities being handled in the bluest states in the nation. Placing blame is the hallmark of the liberal ideology never accepting responsibility
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?