- Joined
- Feb 24, 2013
- Messages
- 40,519
- Reaction score
- 24,139
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
I agree but that isnt racism no matter how much you want it to be.
Now if they were actually hiring the less competant person becasue of race I would agree with you.
It is specifically racism. It is the determination that one candidate is better than the other based on the color of their skin... which is rasist.
Incompetant or less competant people are hired all the time often due to personal connections or just because they act/talk/look in a way thay those hiring like
![]()
Attractive People Have A Big Advantage In The Job Interview
Attractive people are more likely to get hired, receive better evaluations and get paid more. The results indicate that there is something called a “beauty premium” that exists across professions.www.forbes.com
Hiring people because they are attractive, based on nepotism and hiring based on connections is also less competitive because they also don't select employees based on merit.
Race, family, friendship and looks are all bad basis for hiring because none of them prioritize ability.
(Edit: Unless of course the job requires one of those qualities)