We've all laid out the things Trump could have done differently, beginning with not denying the Virus was real, taking the crisis seriously, promoting the wearing of masks and, as of late, not completely abdicating the ****ing job of US President.
Let's put it this way. I know pretty much everything on the planet and beyond better than you do.
Except I'm not a single issue voter, as I have already outlined in my response to you on why I voted for Biden. So it's odd that you talk about credibility when you can't even remember my responses to questions you've asked numerous times already.
Yep. In fairness, I think the US would have faced a lot of the same problems other industrialized nations have had to deal with, but what I think what could have gone better is the amount of cases and deaths in subsequent spikes. Based on the Woodward tapes, there's no denying Trump was fully aware of the potential severity of this disease, but he chose to focus on the economy by trying to not sound the alarm. I can understand missteps in the early days, but once cases were spiking all over, it made little sense to continue down playing the disease and making the prevention measures politically divisive.
I just want to point out that your post is full of falsehoods and lies.
It amazes me that people think that that stuff is true.
No, you just ran out of steam and are left with these ankle biting comments. I've explained why I voted for Biden and on which specific issues in detail. Claiming that no private sector supporter could ever vote for Biden/Harris is rather absurd considering the amount of people who voted for that ticket. It's quite a stretch to think that only non private sector advocates voted for Biden given the wide spread in the popular vote and the fact people in urban centers (the places where the private sector tends to congregate) voted for that ticket.
It's so interesting that you label EVERY Biden voter as a "single issue voter" who only voted for Biden because they "hate" Trump. No matter how many of us tell you otherwise you continue to call us "single issue voters." You do not believe anything we write. Tell us you disagree but can you stop labeling us as all the same and is it possible for you to respond to our views with a rebuttal instead of a denial?
Well....since I have a fairly decent understanding of probabilities, I usually burn my dollar for heat rather than purchase a ticket. Odds are the former will be of more benefit than the latter.Remind me to ask you to give me the Powerball numbers...
No, you just ran out of steam and are left with these ankle biting comments. I've explained why I voted for Biden and on which specific issues in detail. Claiming that no private sector supporter could ever vote for Biden/Harris is rather absurd considering the amount of people who voted for that ticket. It's quite a stretch to think that only non private sector advocates voted for Biden given the wide spread in the popular vote and the fact people in urban centers (the places where the private sector tends to congregate) voted for that ticket.
Because you haven't presented any Biden/Harris rhetoric to discuss, so I'm not sure why you're claiming I have a selective memory.
Already covered this in other threads where you asked the exact same question.
Nope because states run by both Democrats and Republicans certified their elections and where there were discrepancies or close races, recounts were conducted. You seem to be avoiding the most obvious explanation: increased voter turn out. This was a highly polarized election and featured postal voting, which as seen in states who vote this way exclusively, increases voter turnout.
See above.
Primarily, but also from urban centers throughout the country; which, by the way, are where 80% of the population lives.
Nope. Who is actually advocating that?
A question the people alleging fraud have not been able to answer or provide evidence countering what state officials certified.[/QUOTE]
Nope. It's because you haven't presented any Biden/Harris rhetoric to discuss. Now you're talking about "record or results".
Yep.
Not just Democratic poll workers, but GOP state election officials too; unless you're going to tell me they're all "Deep State pedophiles" now. Interesting that you complain about large cities since Trump wasn't going to win in any of them anyway based on previous results.
Hey, if increased voter turn out is a problem for the GOP, then they have some work to do. It doesn't make sense in your version of "logic and common sense" because your premise is flawed.
Since there's no evidence of the manipulation you're claiming, it's neither here nor there. Again, if the GOP wants to perform better, then they need to convince people in urban centers their ideas are better.
I love how you just seem to parrot articles you read.
Already did that too.
No, because it's yet more effort to placate your repeated questions.
Answer this, please? What did Trump do as President that you disagree with while he was President?