[h=1]Hillary mulls challenging legitimacy of 2016 election, cites Russian influence[/h]http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/18/hillary-clinton-mulls-challenging-legitimacy-2016-/
Don't you just Love her?
I do.
She's just an amazing bundle of denial and moronicity.
I do wonder... where's Bill, and why is he letting her hang herself like this?
Don't you just Love her?
I do.
She's just an amazing bundle of denial and moronicity.
I do wonder... where's Bill, and why is he letting her hang herself like this?
Conceding graciously?I believe Trump threatened to call the election results into question if HE did not win, what a petulant child. Kudos to Hilldog for swallowing her pride, conceding graciously, and attending a smooth transition of power, if the roles had been reversed, Trump would not have been so gracious, even Trumpsters know that is a fact. Class is not in Trumps vocabulary, though the phrase "grab her by the *****" is, proof money does not equate to class.
thing is how many votes were changed to trump in not available. never will be.
Yes it is. The answer is zero.
Don't you just Love her?
I do.
She's just an amazing bundle of denial and moronicity.
I do wonder... where's Bill, and why is he letting her hang herself like this?
Prove it.
That's not how it works.
There is ZERO evidence that even a single vote was "changed." If you maintain that any were, you are doing so with no evidence whatsoever, i.e., you're making it up.
Until we can read a persons mind, what they saw, what they read, what influenced their vote, we will never know.
Just the way it is - to deny that is...................
Don't you just Love her?
I do.
She's just an amazing bundle of denial and moronicity.
I do wonder... where's Bill, and why is he letting her hang herself like this?
Ok. Not one person has come forward to claim his vote changed because of Russian influence. If you want to argue that peoples minds and votes were changed, you con show that by bringing forth one person who claims that. Just one.Prove it.
Don't you just Love her?
I do.
She's just an amazing bundle of denial and moronicity.
I do wonder... where's Bill, and why is he letting her hang herself like this?
desperation does not become her
desperation does not become her
Desperate for what? Hilldog said IF the Mueller investigation uncovers a bigger interference in our elections than what is known now than yes, the election should be called into question. SHE also stated that the USA has NO mechanism to throw out elections. I see no desperation on her part. Now you want to see desperation, watch the Liar in Chief fire Mueller like he did Comey, know that smacks of desperation, and foolish.
That is pretty silly. If you read what she actually said is, that is, if it turns out that Russian interference was more significant that what is now believed, then she will look into contesting the result, if there is a legal method to do so(she specifies she does not think there is such a legal method). I tend to think most any one who lost an election where it turns out another country interfered in that election would probably look at possible avenues to challenge.
Don't you just Love her?
I do.
She's just an amazing bundle of denial and moronicity.
I do wonder... where's Bill, and why is he letting her hang herself like this?
Prove it.
You're just making up what you want to believe. There isn't a shred of evidence that any votes were "changed." If you want to establish that they were, you need the evidence to show it.
There's absolutely no evidence that any votes were tampered with, either, which is the ONLY thing that could possibly make the election "illegitimate."
Not 1?
No evidence of even one. If you have it, show it. If not, you're making it up, period.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?