There is no (macro) evolution

[Quag]

Depends on the CT. The conspiracy by the Catholic Church to keep silent priest pedophilia was real, for example. So...not all of those apples fit into the same cart.

That wasnt a Conspiracy Theory that was a conspiracy. One what was well known long before they starting losing lawsuits. People just kept quiet about it for a long time. Then when the lawsuits started the church to save face and money tried to hide everything.

 

[Deuce]

telll me.


View attachment 67203391

The reason is that modern animals didn't exist at the same time as dinosaurs.

See, a dog and a tyrannosaur being found in the same rock layer with the same radioisotope date would disprove evolution. But that has never happened.

 

[Pin dÁr]

The reason is that modern animals didn't exist at the same time as dinosaurs.

See, a dog and a tyrannosaur being found in the same rock layer with the same radioisotope date would disprove evolution. But that has never happened.

We'll see. How about a human footprint alongside a dinosaur footprint, will that do as well? Because there is.

 

[Pin dÁr]

There is really so much that disproves evolution, but it is kept outside the mainstream bull ****.

 

[mike2810]

We'll see. How about a human footprint alongside a dinosaur footprint, will that do as well? Because there is.

prove it.

provide your evidence.

 

[Deuce]

We'll see. How about a human footprint alongside a dinosaur footprint, will that do as well? Because there is.

The Paluxy River tracks were shown to not actually be human footprints. Even the "creation scientist" originally pushing those as human footprints admits that he was wrong.

After several creationist leaders visited the site, at the invitation of Mr. Kuban and Dr. Hastings, John D. Morris of the Institute for Creation Research at El Cajon, Calif., acknowledged in an article that none of the tracks ''can be today regarded as unquestionably human.'' He also wrote, ''It would now be improper for creationists to use the Paluxy data as evidence against evolution.''

Closer inspection showed imprints from three larger toes. They were shallow and worn, so hadn't been noticed immediately. It was some surprise to paleontologists because it was a different footprint pattern than expected, showing that some previous ideas about how certain types of dinosaurs walked might be wrong. An interesting find, but not a human footprint.

 

[Pin dÁr]

prove it.

provide your evidence.

I will tell beforehand that you will not accept it and you will 'edit' the informatiion to keep the 'evolution-hoax' alive and well.

 

[mike2810]

I will tell beforhand that you will not accept it and you will 'edit' the informatiion to keep the 'evolution-hoax' a live and well.

prove it. Show an example where I have "edit" information.

Your post is a typical dodge. What your saying is you cannot and will not back up your statements.

See post 306 regarding humans and dinosaurs.

 

[Pin dÁr]

prove it. Show an example where I have "edit" information.

Your post is a typical dodge. What your saying is you cannot and will not back up your statements.

See post 306 regarding humans and dinosaurs.

all evolutionust do that all the time. Editing the information

No wonder, because it is a belief-system not a real scientific thing at all!

Hence all the editing.

 

[Pin dÁr]

Your post is a typical dodge. What your saying is you cannot and will not back up your statements.

\

Don't be too sure.

 

[Pin dÁr]

You can start editing!

However, the most controversial footprints are those discovered in the Paluxy River, Glen Rose TX, USA. They are mainly controversial because they are found with dinosaur footprints which of course upsets everything man thought he know about origins,

http://www.dinosaurc14ages.com/footprints.htm

 

[Deuce]

I will tell beforehand that you will not accept it and you will 'edit' the informatiion to keep the 'evolution-hoax' alive and well.

I already disproved it before you even posted it. Not my first rodeo, buddy.

 

[Pin dÁr]

the paluxy river tracks were shown to not actually be human footprints. Even the "creation scientist" originally pushing those as human footprints admits that he was wrong.


Closer inspection showed imprints from three larger toes. They were shallow and worn, so hadn't been noticed immediately. It was some surprise to paleontologists because it was a different footprint pattern than expected, showing that some previous ideas about how certain types of dinosaurs walked might be wrong. An interesting find, but not a human footprint.

e.d.i.t.i.n.g!

Q.e.d.

 

[Pin dÁr]

I already disproved it before you even posted it. Not my first rodeo, buddy.

that is irrational illogical ans stupid, girly.

 

[Mark F]

The Paluxy River tracks were shown to not actually be human footprints. Even the "creation scientist" originally pushing those as human footprints admits that he was wrong.


Closer inspection showed imprints from three larger toes. They were shallow and worn, so hadn't been noticed immediately. It was some surprise to paleontologists because it was a different footprint pattern than expected, showing that some previous ideas about how certain types of dinosaurs walked might be wrong. An interesting find, but not a human footprint.

Someone we know have been asking for examples of CT's relying on assumptions without doing due diligence. I think this human/dino footprint fossil nonsense qualifies.

 

[Deuce]

that is irrational illogical ans stupid, girly.

It's not. I know the footprints you were talking about. They aren't human. They were dinosaur footprints that, upon first impression, vaguely resembled human footprints because the toe marks were not very distinct.

A closer look made the toe marks obviously non-human. Even creationists admitted this.

 

[Pin dÁr]

yes, it is.

Anyway, one of the reasons the evolution hoax has to be standing, is that it can be used for social control, socialism.

One of the real reasons this non-sense is very resistent to any change, even without any evidence at hand/

"Modern Socialism is closely allied to the modern scientific theory of
evolution. If laborers understand science, they become socialists.”
Evolution of Man, published by the Socialist Worker’s Party,

So you see, there is a political agenda playing here!



Of course there is.

 

[Pin dÁr]

Of course the masonic order is involved in this kind of "evolution"

The Masonic Order also places a strong emphasis on the theory of
evolution, according to W.L. Wilmhurst’s book entitled "The Meaning of
Masonry", which adds “This — the evolution of man into superman — was
always the purpose of ancient mysteries. Man, who has sprung from the
earth and developed through the lower kingdoms of nature, to his present
rational state, has yet to complete his evolution by becoming a god-like being

It is all a hoax!

 

[Pin dÁr]

And what about (macro) evolution in the scientific labs?

NOTHING!



Round and round they go!


lol

 

[Pin dÁr]

And there is sooo much material outside the mainstream bollocks that prove evolution to be such non-sense!

e..g

Over the centuries, researchers have found bones and artifacts proving that humans like us have existed for millions of years. Mainstream science, however, has supppressed these facts. Prejudices based on current scientific theory act as a "knowledge filter," giving us a picture of prehistory that is largely incorrect.

https://www.amazon.com/Forbidden-Archeology-Hidden-History-Human/dp/0892132949/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1467145266&sr=8-1&keywords=forbidden+archeology

Now, wait for the editing!!




lol

 

[Pin dÁr]

and on and on it goes,

STEPHEN GOULD , Harvard, "...one outstanding fact of the fossil record that many of
you may not be aware of; that since the so called Cambrian explosion...during which
essentially all the anatomical designs of modern multicellular life made their first
appearance in the fossil record, no new Phyla of animals have entered the fossil
record.", Speech at SMU, Oct.2, 1990

Round and round they go!

 

[Pin dÁr]

Round and round they go...

COLIN PATTERSON, Senior Paleontologist British Museum
of Natural History, <Harper's>, p. 60, 1984. "There have been an awful lot of stories,
some more imaginative than others, about what the nature of that history [of life] really
is. The most famous example, still on exhibit downstairs, is the exhibit on horse
evolution prepared perhaps fifty years ago. That has been presented as the literal truth
in textbook after textbook. Now I think that that is lamentable, particularly when the
people who propose those kinds of stories may themselves be aware of the speculative
nature of some of that stuff."

 

[Pin dÁr]

man o man and on it goes...

REPTILE TO BIRD W.E. SWINTON,

"The origin of birds is largely a matter of
deduction. There is no fossil evidence of the stages through which the remarkable
change from reptile to bird was achieved."< BIOLOGY & COMPARATIVE
PHYSIOLOGY OF BIRDS> Vol. 1, p.1.

Well, one could say, (macro) evolution is in 'dire straits'!!!!


I love that!

 

[Pin dÁr]

well, well, well

"WE KNEW BETTER" , NILES ELDREDGE, Columbia Univ., American Museum Of
Natural History, "And it has been the paleontologist my own breed who have been
most responsible for letting ideas dominate reality: .... We paleontologist have said that
the history of life supports that interpretation [gradual adaptive change], all the while
knowing that it does not.", <TIME FRAMES>, 1986, p.144

 

[Pin dÁr]

Evolutionis should be embarrassed by now.

"UNEMBARRASSED" , GOULD & ELDREDGE, "In fact, most published commentary
on punctuated equilibria has been favorable. We are especially pleased that several
paleontologists now state with pride and biological confidence a conclusion that had
previously been simply embarrassing; 'all these years of work and I haven t found any
evolution'. (R.A. REYMENT Quoted) "The occurrences of long sequences within species
are common in boreholes and it is possible to exploit the statistical properties of such
sequences in detailed biostratigraphy. It is noteworthy that gradual, directed
transitions from one species to another do not seem to exist in borehole samples of
microorganisms." (H.J. MACGILLAVRY Quoted) "During my work as an oil
paleontologist I had the opportunity to study sections meeting these rigid
requirements. As an ardent student of evolution, moreover, I was continually on the
watch for evidence of evolutionary change. ...The great majority of species do not show
any appreciable evolutionary change at all. These species appear in the section (first
occurrence) without obvious ancestors in underlying beds, are stable once established."
<Paleobiology>, Vol.3, p.136