- Joined
- Sep 30, 2019
- Messages
- 57,291
- Reaction score
- 88,268
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
The boat was about 1.5 cubic feet. Even if you stacked the critters on top of each other that's not enough room.anyone can stow animals on a Big Boat
The boat was about 1.5 cubic feet. Even if you stacked the critters on top of each other that's not enough room.anyone can stow animals on a Big Boat
The boat was about 1.5 cubic feet. Even if you stacked the critters on top of each other that's not enough room.
Revelation said:nor did she ANNNNOY other people who had visions like me and try to Embarrass them on these almost friendly forums.
please go away and watch some Crystal Vision tonight.
thanks.
blessings. July 9 and the new August 1, dig prep and pray.
If anyone imagines I've shamed them, I'm sorry. Perhaps there was a feeling that what they believe has been rejected by me. However, just because I reject what someone believes or thinks is right, doesn't mean that I reject them as an individual. Again, I'm sorry, but my faith has to rest in the LORD JESUS CHRIST whom I worship (combined with the FATHER and the HOLY SPIRIT) and not interpretations by some organization that wishes to tell me what the Bible actually means according to their doctrine and interpretations. Criticism is never an easy thing to take.You shame no one but maybe yourself, you sure give it your best shot though...
![]()
You do realize that no sea creatures were on the ark to be saved. Genesis 7:15 Pairs of all creatures that have the breath of life in them came to Noah and entered the ark.Thankfully, this little guy and his mating partner made it just in time before the skies opened and Noah and his boys shut the ark door.
View attachment 67578871
They were not there, and there is no way they can say with certainty that these events were not part of the whole. They do express their views based upon their view of the select data.But scientist do agree on a couple of great floods, the Glacial Lake Missoula flood about 18000 years ago. the largest flood on the planet, sorry Noah, this one is backed up by evidence. Glacial Lake Bonneville another great flood, again backed up by science. If you were in the way of any of these floods you'd be history, all life wiped away, even the bedrock in places was stripped away.
Oh, don't think for a minute that you've done any such thing because you can't...but you've certainly tried so don't say you haven't...If anyone imagines I've shamed them,
And at some point in the planning someone suggested "hey, we should make sure to bring a couple of bed bugs".Or the ticks...or the flies...or the stink bugs...![]()
We know that everyone who died in this deluge is in a better place now. Liberated from the confines of their families and all earthly passions and hates. In Texas. Christians.the AI Bot says: 'Yes we can'....
Creationist interpretations argue Noah only needed to bring "kinds" (a broader category than species, closer to families or genera), not every species. This reduces the number to around 1,400–16,000 animals, depending on how "kind" is defined. https://www.perplexity.ai/search/can-the-world-s-animals-fit-on-YuP_bGEXRM.GhBU3SxFlXQ
blessings.
You do realize that no sea creatures were on the ark to be saved. Genesis 7:15 Pairs of all creatures that have the breath of life in them came to Noah and entered the ark.
And GOD shut the door. Genesis 7:16 The animals going in were male and female of every living thing, as God had commanded Noah. Then the LORD shut him in
Does the video explain how Noah managed to get more than 14 million critters in the Ark, how he fed them and what he did with all the poop?
Disagreeing is not shaming. And just because a person begins to see another's point of view, doesn't mean they lost.Oh, don't think for a minute that you've done any such thing because you can't...but you've certainly tried so don't say you haven't...
Disagreeing and moving on, correct...maybe you should try that...just sayin'...Disagreeing is not shaming. And just because a person begins to see another's point of view, doesn't mean they lost.
I already provided evidence that we have created organic compounds from inorganic compounds in labs. That is the basis of life. We know it can be done. We simply haven't been able to fully replicate the time when life began, the exact conditions. That doesn't mean it can't happen. It is simply a limitation of humans, who are quite young ourselves so we didn't have anything to do with it to begin with. The fact that we can make organic compounds from inorganic though is strong evidence that it is possible, is evidence to support the theory that abiogenesis is how life began.So prove that biological life can be manufactured from inert substances. If that is impossible then GOD did it.
That's the point. You can't provide evidence of a miracle so then your argument is a god of the gaps fallacy, claiming that if you can't explain it scientifically, despite evidence showing a scientific explanation, that it must be god. The biggest issue you have is that we can explain it without any god and you want to dismiss it only because you want to stick with your beliefs, not because you have evidence to support your claims.How would one prove a miracle? Do you feel that GOD never works within boundaries of nature? Is it wrong when HE does not?
The fact is that NOAH only needed to deal with land animals. Consider the following: https://arkencounter.com/animals/how-many/God shrank the animals down to a microscopic size and gave Noah a convenient fanny pack to carry them around in. Obviously.
And the ark was equipped with an 18-inch window to shovel all the poop out of.
The heat problem is not simply a few degrees difference on a thermometer. We are talking enough generated heat to cause the oceans to boil away almost instantly. All living matter to be destroyed.The ocean is concentrated water ------- where is the heat problem? As water washes over various areas at different times, by tsunami, I would be surprised that there would be uniformity from one location to the next. In some location the terraferma would be already underwater and in other locations it would face scouring by tsunami ...
It takes several manhours per day to properly care for each animal type, even as babies. You can't simply leave them to their own devices while on a ship. And just shoveling feces alone for an elephant would take hours. That's not counting the many other types of species. And no, it doesn't matter if you make them babies, since that requires more care just in a different way and would lead to questions about how they survived on their own afterwards.The fact is that NOAH only needed to deal with land animals. Consider the following: https://arkencounter.com/animals/how-many/
As for tending the animals, what else did Noah and his family have do? They stayed busy and took care of the animals. Also since the animals were not running around seeking food, their metabolism slowed so they didn't need as much for energy. There obviously were insects on board the ark, and it's likely they also worked to clean up. The ark's window is now seen to possibly have been an 18" inch high and that these ran along the top of the Ark as a venting system. Here is why --- please consider the following in that reguard: https://apologeticspress.org/the-window-of-the-ark-1466/
.
But to make up a probability that sounds "natural" or "logical" enough may just as well be a big lie. You cannot explain everything with proof, anymore than I can explain everything with proof. Sometimes one needs to simply say "I don't know and realize that GOD does some things we cannot fully understand. That isn't a terrible. However, disregarding GOD to hear oneself think up anything other than divine intervention is inherently evil and really doesn't answer the question honestly.That's the point. You can't provide evidence of a miracle so then your argument is a god of the gaps fallacy, claiming that if you can't explain it scientifically, despite evidence showing a scientific explanation, that it must be god. The biggest issue you have is that we can explain it without any god and you want to dismiss it only because you want to stick with your beliefs, not because you have evidence to support your claims.
Correction on this: I meant 1.5 million square feet.The boat was about 1.5 cubic feet. Even if you stacked the critters on top of each other that's not enough room.
There is evidence of massive, cyclic flooding of Rocky Mountain region of the US, from Canada down to Mexico that occurs about once every 5k to 7k years. It also appears to alternate between salt water and fresh water flooding. Fossil Butte in Wyoming has some amazing layering of fossils that show these different layers of salt water, land, fresh water, then land again life.But scientist do agree on a couple of great floods, the Glacial Lake Missoula flood about 18000 years ago. the largest flood on the planet, sorry Noah, this one is backed up by evidence. Glacial Lake Bonneville another great flood, again backed up by science. If you were in the way of any of these floods you'd be history, all life wiped away, even the bedrock in places was stripped away.
No. It is easier to see than "god did it" when you care about the actual evidence.But to make up a probability that sounds "natural" or "logical" enough may just as well be a big lie. You cannot explain everything with proof, anymore than I can explain everything with proof. Sometimes one needs to simply say "I don't know and realize that GOD does some things we cannot fully understand. That isn't a terrible. However, disregarding GOD to hear oneself think up anything other than divine intervention is inherently evil and really doesn't answer the question honestly.
God shrank the animals down to a microscopic size and gave Noah a convenient fanny pack to carry them around in. Obviously.
And the ark was equipped with an 18-inch window to shovel all the poop out of.
I feel that much of the earth's surface was like mud. And yes, there are area's that bucked up and formed the Alps, but this didn't occur all at the same time. Interestingly, the Bible does say that there was a strong wind that dried out the land surfaces. I'm sure this had a cooling affect. You have a good point, but you really cannot say with absolute certainty what would happen. Woulda, coulda, shoulda, are not absolutes! Some day I'd love to talk to Noah, and perhaps I will...The heat problem is not simply a few degrees difference on a thermometer. We are talking enough generated heat to cause the oceans to boil away almost instantly. All living matter to be destroyed.
![]()
Flaws in a Young-Earth Cooling Mechanism | National Center for Science Education
Modern young-earth creationist theories invoke huge quantities of heat — enough to boil most of the oceans and melt the earth's rocks.ncse.ngo
10^28 Joules of heat is far more than you are attempting to describe it as.