The WMD We've Found Thus Far...

[Stinger]

It's it sad to see the desperate measures some people will go to in order to keep their beliefs alive? I expect another ridiculous excuse coming up any post now about how Saddam really was a terrorist threat to the United States, even though none of the evidence even remotely supports the claim.

Saddam himself wasn't a terrorist so technically HE was a terrorist threat. So what?

 

[Cephus]

Saddam himself wasn't a terrorist so technically HE was a terrorist threat. So what?

Bush's claim was that Saddam posed an imminent threat to the United States and that's a lie on about every level it's possible to lie on. Bush claimed that Saddam had WMDs that could claim American lives. That was a lie. Cheney claimed they knew where those WMDs were. That was a lie. So whether or not they find residue of chemical or biological agents years after Saddam was deposed is really irrelevant, all of Bush and Cheney's claims were proven false long ago.

 

[Stinger]

Bush's claim was that Saddam posed an imminent threat to the United States

No it wasn't, he never made that claim and the assertion has been completely debunked.

Here is a thread where it has all been covered

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...n-bush-never-said-saddam-imminent-threat.html

and that's a lie on about every level it's possible to lie on.

It's a lie to claim that the adminsitrations position was that Saddam was an imminent threat.

Bush claimed that Saddam had WMDs that could claim American lives.

Saddam admitted he had them, UNSCOM said he had them, the Clinton adminsitration said he had them. We never found them.

Cheney claimed they knew where those WMDs were.

According to UNSCOM we did, what happened to them, Saddam had admitted he had them.

So whether or not they find residue of chemical or biological agents years after Saddam was deposed is really irrelevant,

It came from somewhere.

all of Bush and Cheney's claims were proven false long ago.

Not at all.

 

[aquapub]

As you concede, Hussein was not a threat to the US. Hussein hadn't used them on the Kurds since the CIA inspired insurgency in 1991. The US attack was in 2003.

Wow. What a steaming load. :bs

I pointed out that Saddam used WMD destruction to show how ridiculous your claim is that Saddam was not a WMD-terror threat. A notorious terror-sponsor who's willing to use WMD personally, obviously wouldn't be above handing them to a terrorist.

You use this to act like I'm agreeing with you. :liar2

Grow up.