• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The US needs political tutelage

That makes him not an Autocrat. His (as in GW) word wasn't law. And today the federal government and Congress has defined roles, meaning there are laws and a Constitution that says that the federal government is able to do things. Back then, much more unclear whether the federal government had any mandate to do anything at all, which the States loved to point out.
I think at these chaotic times a guardianship role is needed again
 
The US needs political tutelage. An Autocrat should step in by this year where his word overrides any law.
I assume you mean a liberal autocrat, right?
 
So did the Nazis.
So did Napoleon, Attaturk, Lee Kuan Yew, Chiang Kai Shek, King Abdullah of Jordan, Michael I of Romania
 
So did Napoleon, Attaturk, Lee Kuan Yew, Chiang Kai Shek, King Abdullah of Jordan, Michael I of Romania
None of those were good people, and alot of what they did ended up damaging their country in the long run.
 
None of those were good people, and alot of what they did ended up damaging their country in the long run.
Singapore is still around. The ROC is still around, an island on Taiwan, but still around. Turkey is still around, living Attaturks legacy. Jordan is still around. Romania is still around living Michael's legacy. The only benevolent dictator that brought his country to ruin on that list is Napoleon. And that is because everyone declared war on him.

What's your definition of a good politician? Lenin? A huge chunk of the Founding Fathers that were slave owners? Jefferson Davis?
 
Do we respect him for it?
Why don't you consider moving to a country that already IS led by an autocrat.
There is no way a majority of Americans will accept autocratic rule and your statement makes it clear that you reject democracy.
This is not the place for you.
 
Why don't you consider moving to a country that already IS led by an autocrat.
There is no way a majority of Americans will accept autocratic rule and your statement makes it clear that you reject democracy.
This is not the place for you.
Is the US so called democracy protecting its strategic interests? Is American democracy lifting people from poverty?

If it accoplishes neither of those things I think the entire electoral process can be abandoned.

Its not I don't want to be democratically elected. Any politician who plays by the rules will be killed or arrested by the time they are known.
 
Is the US so called democracy protecting its strategic interests? Is American democracy lifting people from poverty?

Yes, to the extent possible under current conditions.

If it accoplishes neither of those things I think the entire electoral process can be abandoned.
Its not I don't want to be democratically elected. Any politician who plays by the rules will be killed or arrested by the time they are known.

Contradicting yourself in the same sentence isn't a good look.
Out one side of your face you're demanding the democratic process be dismantled and then out the other side you protest that you don't want to reject democracy.

Seems you're unaware of the level of your own ignorance thanks to your being so self-absorbed, both admirable qualities for your own fantasy of being the autocrat in question.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
Is this ⬆️⬆️⬆️ how you see your role in the world?
I bet it is.
 
Yes, to the extent possible under current conditions.



Contradicting yourself in the same sentence isn't a good look.
Out one side of your face you're demanding the democratic process be dismantled and then out the other side you protest that you don't want to reject democracy.

Seems you're unaware of the level of your own ignorance thanks to your being so self-absorbed, both admirable qualities for your own fantasy of being the autocrat in question.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
Is this ⬆️⬆️⬆️ how you see your role in the world?
I bet it is.
I don't reject liberalism, freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, right to a fair trial. I don't reject we have a history of destroying the Nazis, the Soviets, our any tyrant that stands against those values.

Our strategic interests are not being protected? Guns are going over the border for profit on the lie of so called protecting our right to bear arms, all our stuff is made by an adversary, even the most nationalistic of Americans colludes with our enemies. Are we even a nation?
 
Last edited:
I don't reject liberalism, freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, right to a fair trial. I don't reject we have a history of destroying the Nazis, the Soviets, our any tyrant that stands against those values.

Our strategic interests are not being protected? Guns are going over the border for profit on the lie of so called protecting our right to bear arms, all our stuff is made by an adversary, even the most nationalistic of Americans colludes with our enemies. Are we even a nation?

So your answer is a POTUS 4 LIFE?
Yeah okay Ignatius.
 
The US needs political tutelage. An Autocrat should step in by this year where his word overrides any law.
The US Constitution strictly prevents kings and dictators. I sugest that you move to Russia where your autocratic idea is common.
 
I said political tutelage

You said AND SAY all kinds of crazy stuff.
Tutelage, and here you are, announcing that you're a "National Mentor".

1679170879604.png ⬅️⬅️⬅️⬅️

"An Autocrat should step in by this year where his word overrides any law."
Exactly what the **** does that mean? It means that you THINK you're "THE TEACHER" and that you think an autocrat who can override any law will be the muscle behind your "tutelage".
1679170978845.webp
You ARE Ignatius J. Reilly.

1679171000140.webp
You may not realize it yet but you're carving it in forty foot high letters which are difficult to ignore.

Override any law is the textbook definition of absolute power.
WTF dude, do you worship dictators? Go live in a dictatorship and get back to us with how much you love it.
 
You said AND SAY all kinds of crazy stuff.
Tutelage, and here you are, announcing that you're a "National Mentor".

"An Autocrat should step in by this year where his word overrides any law."
Exactly what the **** does that mean? It means that you THINK you're "THE TEACHER" and that you think an autocrat who can override any law will be the muscle behind your "tutelage".

You ARE Ignatius J. Reilly.
You may not realize it yet but you're carving it in forty foot high letters which are difficult to ignore.
I wonder if this is a Stormfront talking point today in defense of trump who claims that he will be arrested soon.
 
I wonder if this is a Stormfront talking point today in defense of trump who claims that he will be arrested soon.
I wonder if this is Ignatius J. Reilly incarnate.

“I am at the moment writing a lengthy indictment against our century. When my brain begins to reel from my literary labors, I make an occasional cheese dip.”
“We shall storm the office very shortly, thereby surprising the foe when his senses are still subject to the psychic mists of early morning.”
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom