• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The US funds Al Qaeda

Cravestock

New member
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Full Article:HarvestMoonNews

The United States has been funding and operating Al Qaeda for years — When the majority of Americans are approached with this revelation it is viewed as “nonsensical conspiracy theory.’ An immediate response would be “if that were true the Mainstream Media would report on it and everyone would be aware of this!’ - What those people don’t get is that is not how the world works. 90% of all media you see from television is owned by 6 corporations.

Six. Radio is for the most part — not much better although, there are many independent radio stations broadcasting a more honest rendition of world events. You could call radio and the internet (which in many ways have merged) the last frontier which is why we see trade agreements like the Trans Pacific Partnership. So essentially you have six corporations in media who control what the majority of America sees and hears — Wonderful. It is as if news being broadcasted from anything but an MSNBC, FOXNEWS, CNN or the like is regarded as junk — Even though the mainstream media is highly biased in what amounts to pure propaganda and lies. The mainstream media has been caught on record lying to the general public – Not misinterpreting; Not misunderstanding; Not making honest mistakes; lying. Most people just don’t believe it even when a simple google search would show them the contrary – But even then many people just don’t care and say “so what.” The very phrase “mainstream media” causes some fools to roll their eyes as if it is just some message board internet meme.
 
Full Article:HarvestMoonNews

The United States has been funding and operating Al Qaeda for years — When the majority of Americans are approached with this revelation it is viewed as “nonsensical conspiracy theory.’ An immediate response would be “if that were true the Mainstream Media would report on it and everyone would be aware of this!’ - What those people don’t get is that is not how the world works.
90% of all media you see from television is owned by 6 corporations.






Six. Radio is for the most part — not much better although, there are many independent radio stations broadcasting a more honest rendition of world events. You could call radio and the internet (which in many ways have merged) the last frontier which is why we see trade agreements like the Trans Pacific Partnership. So essentially you have six corporations in media who control what the majority of America sees and hears — Wonderful. It is as if news being broadcasted from anything but an MSNBC, FOXNEWS, CNN or the like is regarded as junk — Even though the mainstream media is highly biased in what amounts to pure propaganda and lies. The mainstream media has been caught on record lying to the general public – Not misinterpreting; Not misunderstanding; Not making honest mistakes; lying. Most people just don’t believe it even when a simple google search would show them the contrary – But even then many people just don’t care and say “so what.” The very phrase “mainstream media” causes some fools to roll their eyes as if it is just some message board internet meme.




So what?

Why should anyone accept any of the malarkey that Harvest Moon posts on the internet as the true, accurate news?

I believe that I'll stick with the BBC.
 
Harvest Moon News makes perfect sense if you accept that the Soviet military forces were sent into Afghanistan for peace and expanding human rights. Take that "fact" away and the rest of the argument quickly falls apart. ;)
 
Yes, this is old news indeed, but certainly relevant to the Global War On Terror.

Charlie Wilson's War was rather the Hollywood treatment of it.
 
So what?

Why should anyone accept any of the malarkey that Harvest Moon posts on the internet as the true, accurate news?

I believe that I'll stick with the BBC.
because harvestmoonnews cited sources, also a bbc documentary was in the article.

I don't understand your logic....It is that of a lunatic fringe conspiracy theorist who is aware sockpuppets exist, so therefore everyone must be sockpuppet.

I suppose you could call it thinking for yourself, how bout that for a concept? Also, 90% of mainstream media is owned by 6 corporations, not the alternative media. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
 
charlie wilson was not as big a deal as hollywood made him out to be in all this. Many are not able to seperate themselves from what hollywood says from what really happened.
 

I dont know if you were aware of this, but even before nintendo and neil young....there was this......
(get ready to have your mind BLOWN.)

Harvest and Hunter's moons[edit]

Full moon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A harvest moon
"Harvest Moon" and "Hunter's Moon" are traditional terms for the full moons occurring in autumn, usually in September and October, respectively. The "Harvest Moon" is the full moon closest to autumnal equinox, and the "Hunter's Moon" is the one following it. The names are recorded from the early 18th century.[6] OED for "Harvest Moon" cites a 1706 reference, and for "Hunter's Moon" a 1710 edition of The British Apollo , where the term is attributed to "the country people" (The Country People call this the Hunters-Moon.) The names became traditional in American folklore, where they are now often popularly attributed to "the Native Americans".[7] The Feast of the Hunters' Moon is a yearly festival in Lafayette, Indiana, held in late September or early October each year since 1968.[8] In 2010, the Harvest moon occurred on the night of equinox itself (some 5½ hours after the point of equinox) for the first time since 1991.[9][10]
All full moons rise around the time of sunset. Because the moon orbits the earth in the same direction the earth is rotating, the moon rises later each day – on average about 50.47 minutes later each day [11] The Harvest Moon and Hunter's Moon are unique because the time difference between moonrises on successive evenings is much shorter than average. The moon rises approximately 30 minutes later from one night to the next, as seen from about 40 degrees N or S latitude. Thus, there is no long period of darkness between sunset and moonrise for several days following the actual date of the full moon.


Maybe one day when you are not pop culture obsessed, when you hear something that is also the name of a video game, the video game wont be the first thing to pop into your mind...now go play some x-box! yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!! video games rock!
 
I dont know if you were aware of this, but even before nintendo and neil young....there was this......
(get ready to have your mind BLOWN.)




Maybe one day when you are not pop culture obsessed, when you hear something that is also the name of a video game, the video game wont be the first thing to pop into your mind...now go play some x-box! yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!! video games rock!

X-Box sucks.
 
lol, no, they don't


Yes...'lol.'

Who were the rebels in libya? What about the rebels in Syria? Was I the only one aware of who those rebels were and did not CIA know who they were as well?

What was the point of bombing Libya, or helping the syrian rebels?

Get a damn clue.




lol.
 
Yes...'lol.'

Who were the rebels in libya? What about the rebels in Syria? Was I the only one aware of who those rebels were and did not CIA know who they were as well?

Is the answer you want al qaeda? Just a bunch of al qaeda operatives, no one else?

What was the point of bombing Libya, or helping the syrian rebels?

Get a damn clue.




lol.

lol are you saying it's to help al qaeda? This is great. Please: read a book.
 
Is the answer you want al qaeda? Just a bunch of al qaeda operatives, no one else?



lol are you saying it's to help al qaeda? This is great. Please: read a book.

No it wasnt just Al Qaeda in Libya or Syria, but the 'secularists' pledged their loyalty to al qaeda, dummy. Read a current event sometime.


No it is not about 'helping al qaeda' for the sake of helping al qaeda...You have no understanding of the geopolitical ramifications at work with proxy armies, that much is true. First you would have to understand why proxy armies are used in the first place, mainly for destabilization. To understand that you would need a brain.

Please get a brain.
 
No it wasnt just Al Qaeda in Libya or Syria, but the 'secularists' pledged their loyalty to al qaeda, dummy. Read a current event sometime.


No it is not about 'helping al qaeda' for the sake of helping al qaeda...You have no understanding of the geopolitical ramifications at work with proxy armies, that much is true. First you would have to understand why proxy armies are used in the first place, mainly for destabilization. To understand that you would need a brain.

Please get a brain.

I don't? I have a master's in international relations. I'm intrigued, how would I get as educated as you?
 
Full Article:HarvestMoonNews

The United States has been funding and operating Al Qaeda for years — When the majority of Americans are approached with this revelation it is viewed as “nonsensical conspiracy theory.’ An immediate response would be “if that were true the Mainstream Media would report on it and everyone would be aware of this!’ - What those people don’t get is that is not how the world works. 90% of all media you see from television is owned by 6 corporations.

Six. Radio is for the most part — not much better although, there are many independent radio stations broadcasting a more honest rendition of world events. You could call radio and the internet (which in many ways have merged) the last frontier which is why we see trade agreements like the Trans Pacific Partnership. So essentially you have six corporations in media who control what the majority of America sees and hears — Wonderful. It is as if news being broadcasted from anything but an MSNBC, FOXNEWS, CNN or the like is regarded as junk — Even though the mainstream media is highly biased in what amounts to pure propaganda and lies. The mainstream media has been caught on record lying to the general public – Not misinterpreting; Not misunderstanding; Not making honest mistakes; lying. Most people just don’t believe it even when a simple google search would show them the contrary – But even then many people just don’t care and say “so what.” The very phrase “mainstream media” causes some fools to roll their eyes as if it is just some message board internet meme.

The article is ranting and raving. The US doesn't fund Al Qaeda. It does fumble around creating or complicating vacuums of power in the Middle East and Central Asia.
 
The article is ranting and raving. The US doesn't fund Al Qaeda. It does fumble around creating or complicating vacuums of power in the Middle East and Central Asia.

Do you not get it, that is
UNCLE SAM backed the anti-Russian rebels in the war after the old USSR
invaded Afghanistan ...... can U dig it?
 
Do you not get it, that is
UNCLE SAM backed the anti-Russian rebels in the war after the old USSR
invaded Afghanistan ...... can U dig it?

The unintended consequences of funding the Mujihadeen against the Soviets does not equal funding Al Qaeda. ;)
 
The unintended consequences of funding the Mujihadeen against the Soviets does not equal funding Al Qaeda. ;)

do you know who TIM OSMAN was? also, "Al Qeada" is a fabrication a fraud by the US mainstream media to scare the public into submission, so we will que up to be searched & surrender our Constitutional rights, in order to travel by air, in the name of being "safe".
what a CROCK!
 
do you know who TIM OSMAN was? also, "Al Qeada" is a fabrication a fraud by the US mainstream media to scare the public into submission, so we will que up to be searched & surrender our Constitutional rights, in order to travel by air, in the name of being "safe".
what a CROCK!

Ohhhhhhh.
 
Do you not get it, that is
UNCLE SAM backed the anti-Russian rebels in the war after the old USSR
invaded Afghanistan ...... can U dig it?

lol Menard doesn't even know the difference between the mujahideen and bin laden and abdullah azzam's services office. He thinks they're the same. Hell, he thinks the "Tim Osman" thing is real.
 
lol Menard doesn't even know the difference between the mujahideen and bin laden and abdullah azzam's services office. He thinks they're the same. Hell, he thinks the "Tim Osman" thing is real.

and You have prof ?

or?

oh yea, the mainstream media told you so .......


oh well ...
 
and You have prof ?

or?

oh yea, the mainstream media told you so .......


oh well ...

Proof of what?

And no, this isn't from the mainstream media, unless you think Muslim reporters in the Middle East and South Asia are mainstream.

But this is great, you don't need proof for what you're saying, but I need proof to refute you. And you've already tried to say whatever source I had is wrong in case that I do provide some. Too bad you were wrong about the source, huh? Made your failure go from typical to catastrophic.
 
I don't? I have a master's in international relations. I'm intrigued, how would I get as educated as you?

When someone uses their college degree as a talking point in a debate, it means they have nothing else but the the generic claim of 'having a degree.'

You may have a degree, but you certainly are not showing it, as this makes this lame degree of yours worthless, atleast here it does. Take your stupid degree and shove it up your ass. George Bush went to Yale and obama went to harvard....They must be smart then! You stupid ****......

On a side note, your spending your masters degree debating layman on an internet forum...You are bottom of the barrel at best among your fellow intellectuals at academia, the thing is the barrel has also sprung a leak.

Finally - Your masters degree does not disprove your blatant ignorance of the west funding Al Qaeda....Paul Krugman teaches at princeton and is far more educated than you...Keynesian economics must be a good thing then....

Next time learn how to debate.

dummy.
 
Last edited:
Do you not get it, that is
UNCLE SAM backed the anti-Russian rebels in the war after the old USSR
invaded Afghanistan ...... can U dig it?


No....They were funding Mujahideen BEFORE the soviets invaded.

You are not even aware of details such as that, but yes, tell me more how you know the US doesnt fund Al Qaeda....

I hope you have a degree you can rub in my face like that other idiot.....You got nothing else.
 
No....They were funding Mujahideen BEFORE the soviets invaded.

You are not even aware of details such as that, but yes, tell me more how you know the US doesnt fund Al Qaeda....

I hope you have a degree you can rub in my face like that other idiot.....You got nothing else.

1) The Mujahideen of Afghanistan didn't EXIST until after the Soviets invaded.

2) If the United States finances al Qaeda, surely you can present evidence of that, yeah? Like an expenditure document from the C.I.A. or State Department or even I.R.S.
 
Back
Top Bottom