• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The REAL problem w/the cancellation of old policies

JumpinJack

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Messages
6,628
Reaction score
2,971
Location
Dallas, TX
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Independent
Let's face it...the elephant in the room. Which is that the REAL problem of the cancellation of former policies is that the NEW ones are not good substitutes. The new ones have skimpy provider lists AND are way too expensive.

Finally, I heard an ACA architect on tv finally reference the fact that the new policies WILL be more expensive for healthy people. Really? Funny...I didn't hear Obama tell the public that when this bill was being passed. That many people would have to pay MORE for the new policies.

If people could get similar coverage at affordable costs, the cancellation of the old policies wouldn't matter.

The administration and its spokespersons and ACA supporters repeat over and over that the old policies were substandard and the new ones are SO much better! Well...if you can't afford something, that doesn't really matter, does it? A Lexus might be a better car than another one, but if you can't afford a Lexus, that doesn't matter.

Second....it's not TRUE that all the new policies are better than all the old policies. It's simply not true. Look at a reasonably priced old policy (www.ehealthinsurance.com...click on "benefits summary," and click on "Find A Provider" to locate providers near you). Then look at the lowest priced NEW policies for 2014 for your area. Look at the benefits summary and see what all the new coverages are that you'll get THAT YOU WILL NEED OR USE. Forget about "reasonably priced" new policies. They don't exist. But pay special attention to the "Find A Provider" list for providers near you. If you are like me, a check on the lowest priced new policies will show that there is only ONE gynecologist within 10 miles of me (I'm guessing that's someone desperate for patients....and trying to get an appt and driving 10 miles away will be a problem for many...and since it's a foreign name, s/he may not even speak English). Just one gynecologist. There are several internal medicine drs, most of whom don't speak English. Try to get an appt with the two who do. And I would still have to drive far to get there. But the fact is that NONE of my doctors accept those lowest cost policies. None. Not one drs' name that I recognize. No respected, established doctor will have anything to do with those lowest policies.

THAT MAKES THE NEW POLICIES SUBSTANDARD in actual practice, although they may look good on the surface. But even for the higher priced ones that respected doctors will accept, the cost is prohibitive. They are WAY more expensive than the old policies that provided the coverage the insured need. The new ones have HIGH DEDUCTIBLES, providing no coverage for anything other than serious medical conditions.

In other words, if you are very sick, with a chronic expensive condition, or if you get cancer or something expensive to treat, only then will your very expensive NEW policy cover you. And that's only if you opt for the ones you can't afford, since almost no providers will accept the lowest cost ones.

The new policies are substandard in actual practice. Not the old ones. The reverse is true of what the ACA hawkers are repeating all over tv all day. People who don't check the facts are falling for the lie. Listen...listen to see if they point to anything that can be verified.

I've told you where to go to check out specific policies and compare them. The facts are there.
 
Last edited:
As someone who lost their insurance but would have preferred to keep it (and I am sorry for that, btw), I predict you will get.... well, by and large, silence :(.

It's much easier to just tell ones'self that the plans were substandard if you don't have to deal with the actual people involved.
 
...

In other words, if you are very sick, with a chronic expensive condition, or if you get cancer or something expensive to treat, only then will your very expensive NEW policy cover you. And that's only if you opt for the ones you can't afford, since almost no providers will accept the lowest cost ones.

The new policies are substandard in actual practice. Not the old ones. The reverse is true of what the ACA hawkers are repeating all over tv all day. People who don't check the facts are falling for the lie. Listen...listen to see if they point to anything that can be verified.

I've told you where to go to check out specific policies and compare them. The facts are there.
one aspect I hadn't known about.
I hope you find something you can use; i'm on a ACA rated "substandard plan", but i'm pretty healthy and will keep it as long as possible
(cheap/works for me)
 
That's very interesting. Thanks for presenting this.
BTW, the link did not seem to work as it had the "...click" included in the URL
www.ehealthinsurance.com
 
Let's face it...the elephant in the room. Which is that the REAL problem of the cancellation of former policies is that the NEW ones are not good substitutes. The new ones have skimpy provider lists AND are way too expensive.

Finally, I heard an ACA architect on tv finally reference the fact that the new policies WILL be more expensive for healthy people. Really? Funny...I didn't hear Obama tell the public that when this bill was being passed. That many people would have to pay MORE for the new policies.

If people could get similar coverage at affordable costs, the cancellation of the old policies wouldn't matter.

The administration and its spokespersons and ACA supporters repeat over and over that the old policies were substandard and the new ones are SO much better! Well...if you can't afford something, that doesn't really matter, does it? A Lexus might be a better car than another one, but if you can't afford a Lexus, that doesn't matter.

Second....it's not TRUE that all the new policies are better than all the old policies. It's simply not true. Look at a reasonably priced old policy (www.ehealthinsurance.com...click on "benefits summary," and click on "Find A Provider" to locate providers near you). Then look at the lowest priced NEW policies for 2014 for your area. Look at the benefits summary and see what all the new coverages are that you'll get THAT YOU WILL NEED OR USE. Forget about "reasonably priced" new policies. They don't exist. But pay special attention to the "Find A Provider" list for providers near you. If you are like me, a check on the lowest priced new policies will show that there is only ONE gynecologist within 10 miles of me (I'm guessing that's someone desperate for patients....and trying to get an appt and driving 10 miles away will be a problem for many...and since it's a foreign name, s/he may not even speak English). Just one gynecologist. There are several internal medicine drs, most of whom don't speak English. Try to get an appt with the two who do. And I would still have to drive far to get there. But the fact is that NONE of my doctors accept those lowest cost policies. None. Not one drs' name that I recognize. No respected, established doctor will have anything to do with those lowest policies.

THAT MAKES THE NEW POLICIES SUBSTANDARD in actual practice, although they may look good on the surface. But even for the higher priced ones that respected doctors will accept, the cost is prohibitive. They are WAY more expensive than the old policies that provided the coverage the insured need. The new ones have HIGH DEDUCTIBLES, providing no coverage for anything other than serious medical conditions.

In other words, if you are very sick, with a chronic expensive condition, or if you get cancer or something expensive to treat, only then will your very expensive NEW policy cover you. And that's only if you opt for the ones you can't afford, since almost no providers will accept the lowest cost ones.

The new policies are substandard in actual practice. Not the old ones. The reverse is true of what the ACA hawkers are repeating all over tv all day. People who don't check the facts are falling for the lie. Listen...listen to see if they point to anything that can be verified.

I've told you where to go to check out specific policies and compare them. The facts are there.

I think the best joke they played on us is the name of the law itself. Straight out of 1984.
 
I m still just trying to figure out why anyone believed him in the first place. Certainly this isnt really a surprise.
 
$50 month is way to expensive? 4% of take home pay or free is expensive?

A policy that covers all for life is worse?

WOW - that is some CEO propoganda.............
 
I m still just trying to figure out why anyone believed him in the first place. Certainly this isnt really a surprise.

Because he's the modern day Pied Piper.
 
$50 month is way to expensive? 4% of take home pay or free is expensive?

A policy that covers all for life is worse?

WOW - that is some CEO propoganda.............

Try this issue -
Just some stats for comparison (3+ / 0-)

In my rural part of Az I have a selection of 100 plans offered by 8 providers:

Bronze: 22 $181.11 - 496.72
Silver: 35 $207.03 - 387.98
Gold: 30 $235.65 - 460.96
Platinum: 13 $266.09 - 388.81

I think it is interesting that the most expensive plan available is a Bronze...

I'm very happy with the pricing (doesn't reflect tax credit.); but there are issues with Network. Of the 35 Silver plans offered none of them have a single Dr. in my area. Haven't checked all the Gold or any of the Platinum plans yet.

Find it strange that the Same provider has different networks depending on which plan you choose. U think from a logistics issue it would be easier to have one network across all their plans...

A mind like a book, has to be open to function properly.

by falconer520 on Fri Nov 15, 2013 at 02:13:49 PM PST
Daily Kos: My Personal Experience with the Marketplace, Part 3: Success, Finally, and a Few Recommendations

Really cool, right?

100 plans to choose from, great prices....hey, wait a minute....nobody in the area accepts this coverage!

-edit-

I would also like to add that the individual who wrote the diary (not the post) I cited is receiving a subsidy which is great but then they go on to say that they hope they earn more this year. Well, if that happens then their subsidy will decrease and they will end up having to pay the excess back. I'd like to see their diary then.
 
Last edited:
I m still just trying to figure out why anyone believed him in the first place. Certainly this isnt really a surprise.

021.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom