The psychology of climate change denial

[Jack Hays]

lol...stopped reading right there.


BTW: what is it with deniers and their need to use weird fonts?

Your ignorance is your prison.

 

[Jack Hays]

You realize the kind of replies you're going to get about saying "three scientific organisations in the USA which will not allow discussion from any skeptical point of view "

That's two big defections from the "consensus" in the last couple of months.

 

[ecofarm]

Your ignorance is your prison.

You say that to everyone, even people with graduate degrees in the subject. What you mean is, "my CT cult sets me free".

 

[calamity]

Your ignorance is your prison.

When the arctic is burning, and someone says "no big deal," that person has no business calling anyone else ignorant.

 

[Sunsettommy]

When the arctic is burning, and someone says "no big deal," that person has no business calling anyone else ignorant.

More hyperbole come from you, who doesn't understand the concept of COHERENCE in science research.

Hyperbole is a sign of science ignorance and illiteracy, which is why anything before 1880 is unknown to you.

You have no idea if it is a big deal or not since those events are not being properly assed to the history of the region, its Biology, Zoology, and to the Holocene time frame.

:2wave:

 

[Jack Hays]

You say that to everyone, even people with graduate degrees in the subject. What you mean is, "my CT cult sets me free".

Some degrees are wasted.

 

[ecofarm]

Some degrees are wasted.

Yeah, CT blogs got that Truth.

But degrees dealing with climate change are all fake.

 

[Jack Hays]

When the arctic is burning, and someone says "no big deal," that person has no business calling anyone else ignorant.

There have always been wildfires. They have declined for many decades.

 

[Threegoofs]

More hyperbole come from you, who doesn't understand the concept of COHERENCE in science research.

Hyperbole is a sign of science ignorance and illiteracy, which is why anything before 1880 is unknown to you.

You have no idea if it is a big deal or not since those events are not being properly assed to the history of the region, its Biology, Zoology, and to the Holocene time frame.

:2wave:

Coherence.

Is that when someone simultaneously denies that there is a strong scientific consensus in science despite being confronted with the fact that virtually EVERY SINGLE scientific society known to man has basically backed the findings of the IPCC?

Or someone who dismisses the work of established experts on, say, polar bear populations and slavishly follows one non-expert blog and thinks that’s the scientific truth?

I think that’s actually ‘in’coherence, which is pretty much your position.

LOL.

What a joke.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Coherence.

Is that when someone simultaneously denies that there is a strong scientific consensus in science despite being confronted with the fact that virtually EVERY SINGLE scientific society known to man has basically backed the findings of the IPCC?

Or someone who dismisses the work of established experts on, say, polar bear populations and slavishly follows one non-expert blog and thinks that’s the scientific truth?

I think that’s actually ‘in’coherence, which is pretty much your position.

LOL.

What a joke.

It is clear you are a confused little boy.

Try reading the definition next time, since you made a complete fool of yourself here.

Cheers.

 

[Jack Hays]

Yeah, CT blogs got that Truth.

But degrees dealing with climate change are all fake.

Not all, but yours seems to be.

 

[ecofarm]

Not all, but yours seems to be.

No, you claim all of them are fake, millions of them. The only real science is at CT blogs.

 

[Jack Hays]

No, you claim all of them are fake, millions of them. The only real science is at CT blogs.

No. That's just another of your fictional claims.

 

[ecofarm]

No. That's just another of your fictional claims.

Projection.

 

[longview]

Projection.

So tell us, with your degree since the warming before 1950 (Hadcrut4) is .288 C,
and the feedback factor for an ECS of 3C is 2.72, what should the projected feedback temperature be in 2019?

 

[ecofarm]

:lamo

 

[Threegoofs]

It is clear you are a confused little boy.

Try reading the definition next time, since you made a complete fool of yourself here.

Cheers.

You certainly would be the expert on making a complete fool of yourself, but I fail to see your point.

 

[Sunsettommy]

You certainly would be the expert on making a complete fool of yourself, but I fail to see your point.

:lamo

YOU fail to understand anyone's points.

It is made clear you can't specify what my error is, just empty replies is all you can muster up, while I posted the definition of the word you have yet to read:

COHERENCE in science research.

a
: systematic or logical connection or consistency
The essay as a whole lacks coherence.
b
: integration of diverse elements, relationships, or values

You have been exposed once again.

:lol:

 

[Threegoofs]

:lamo

YOU fail to understand anyone's points.

It is made clear you can't specify what my error is, just empty replies is all you can muster up, while I posted the definition of the word you have yet to read:

COHERENCE in science research.



You have been exposed once again.

:lol:

All I see is you being...incoherent.

 

[ludin]

Where did you get this information?

umm the people that invented the global warming theory, but nice of you to hack my post apart.
which is why you can't have honest discussion with zealots.

there is no evidence of a run away greenhouse effect going on.
there is a quote button for a reason. it quotes everything that someone says.

 

[ludin]

So tell us, with your degree since the warming before 1950 (Hadcrut4) is .288 C,
and the feedback factor for an ECS of 3C is 2.72, what should the projected feedback temperature be in 2019?

don't ask them about facts and numbers they can't deal with it.

 

[ocean515]

I don’t have time for this.

That's what I thought. Cheers!

 

[flogger]

So tell us, with your degree since the warming before 1950 (Hadcrut4) is .288 C,
and the feedback factor for an ECS of 3C is 2.72, what should the projected feedback temperature be in 2019?

Ouch ! Don't hold your breath for an answer anytime soon on that one Longview :doh

 

[Media_Truth]

So tell us, with your degree since the warming before 1950 (Hadcrut4) is .288 C,
and the feedback factor for an ECS of 3C is 2.72, what should the projected feedback temperature be in 2019?

When you get your phD in Climatology, maybe you will be able to find the answers to your silly questions. Right now, it is nothing but uneducated gibberish.

 

[flogger]

When you get your phD in Climatology, maybe you will be able to find the answers to your silly questions. Right now, it is nothing but uneducated gibberish.

Prove it ? The head of the IPCC until 2016 was an ex railway engineer with no scientific qualification whatsoever :shock: