sudan
Active member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Messages
- 267
- Reaction score
- 20
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
The fecundity of the Republic of South Sudan (RoSS) as an abstract State; and as a human society; in terms of politics of domination and insurrection (PoDI); has created a new source of comprehensive instability to regional and continental peace and security. There is a danger in our drive in the RoSS; towards a determined institutionalisation of the PoDI. This PoDI has got many dimensions within the ambit of our socio-political as well as economic and financial paradigms in the RoSS. Our polity and politics are effectively being managed along the expected scenarios of African political clientelism. Primordial political tactics and strategies (PPTS) are fully in operation in the RoSS; and as necessary and sufficient conditions for the effective and efficient success of these PPTS; the RoSS must be fatally riddled with the PoDI.
The Africaniation of modern paradigms of governance in most African countries; including the RoSS means that; the phenomena of politics and economics of elites, must as of necessity; be played within the premise of zero-sum logic. This is given; because; in economics of elites; the subaltern populace are of no concern. Economic development as far as the elites are concerned; is measured within the ambit and remit of personal and group success. The group here is devoid of communitarian meaning as implied in social contract parlance. On the other hand; within the ambit of PPTS; the abstract State of South Sudan is treated within the private sphere of the ruling elites. Therefore; reaction to domination which is a tool of art and science in terms of PPTS is always the resort to insurrection. The insurrectionists also treat the abstract State of South Sudan within their private sphere; and in total isolation of the populace therein.
In politics of elites; saturated in PPTS, the abstract State is always an ally; and the perfection of the zero-sum logic is due to the fact that; any other person outside the immediate ruling elites is always an enemy of the abstract State; but, however; they, the ruling elites; are within the abstract State; so that; if an individual, outside the circle of this ruling elites; disagree with the ruling elites, he or she is considered an enemy of the State. Not only that; but the populace, who by definition in terms of politics of elites; are just political pawns in the hands of the ruling elites; are then quickly brought in as victims of this enemy as defined by the ruling elites. This is just to agitate the raw emotions of the permanent subaltern populace; as human foundations upon which, the immorality of the ruling elites rest. This is a heartless search for legitimacy and therefore, the legalisation of the illegal as it were.
The culture of zero-sum politics in the RoSS; does not allow the emergence of a constructive space and opportunity for human enlightenment. It encourages a kind of cal-de-sac political vision; which does not have a communitarian concept and practice. It is always about the self; as well as the selves in the groups. The reality of scarce resources in real life is taken as personal and group threat according to the logic of zero-sum politics which inform the politics of elites in the RoSS. Therefore; in order to succeed in this sordid political atmosphere; you have to dominate. On the other hand; in order to survive in this cruel political environment; you have to become an insurgent. Therefore; domination and insurrection become inseparable two faces of the political coin in the RoSS.
In the RoSS; PPTS are operationalised via the other institution of governance known as tribalism. The institution of tribalism (IT) is extremely rapacious in the RoSS. This rapaciousness of the IT is one of the explanatory variables for the near endemic PoDI in the RoSS. The IT has also introduced serious and dangerous doubts into many people’s minds in the RoSS, as regards the definition of liberation. Some peoples in the RoSS are genuinely wondering as to whether; others have literally replaced the near holy doctrine of self-determination with self-satisfaction. The ubiquitous phenomenon of zero-sum politics in the RoSS makes one to become overwhelmed with fear that; one is living in paradigms of organised crime. The exigencies of raw PoDI engender these feelings in many poor citizens of the RoSS.
Within the ambit of the PoDI; many individuals therein; avoid their human and legal responsibilities towards the subaltern others in the RoSS; and at the same time, these dominators want to be in charge of civil and political institutions on which many innocent human persons depend. The culture of political and civil domination is so endemic in many of our institutions in the RoSS; to the extent that, the behaviour threatens the integrity of these institutions, except that, the human persons put in charge of these institutions lack human capacity to recognise instances where integrity is in danger of being lost. One of the dangers of domination is that, once it gets hold of important political institutions in a country, it sets in a process of political decay that undermines many plans and policies upon which national development strategies are based. On the other hand; that is PPTS in play in the RoSS.
It is more alarming if domination is practiced by human persons who yesterday; were insurgents fighting against the general concept and practice of human domination. It is more hurting if these individuals were supposed to be the solid operatives and dynamos of political, civil, security, and social positive development processes in the RoSS. No human population would like to know that, political organisations upon which their lives depend are being managed by human persons who are dangerously reckless to the extent that, important matters are tackled on the basis of PoDI saturated in PPTS; and not on the basis of reasoned commitments within the available political, economic, and security resources. A political leadership that is entrenched in PoDI and saturated in PPTS is that kind of leadership that is permanently divided despite polemics and rhetoric of united leadership saturated in the spirit and letter of joint and collective responsibility needed by an effective political leadership.
The Africaniation of modern paradigms of governance in most African countries; including the RoSS means that; the phenomena of politics and economics of elites, must as of necessity; be played within the premise of zero-sum logic. This is given; because; in economics of elites; the subaltern populace are of no concern. Economic development as far as the elites are concerned; is measured within the ambit and remit of personal and group success. The group here is devoid of communitarian meaning as implied in social contract parlance. On the other hand; within the ambit of PPTS; the abstract State of South Sudan is treated within the private sphere of the ruling elites. Therefore; reaction to domination which is a tool of art and science in terms of PPTS is always the resort to insurrection. The insurrectionists also treat the abstract State of South Sudan within their private sphere; and in total isolation of the populace therein.
In politics of elites; saturated in PPTS, the abstract State is always an ally; and the perfection of the zero-sum logic is due to the fact that; any other person outside the immediate ruling elites is always an enemy of the abstract State; but, however; they, the ruling elites; are within the abstract State; so that; if an individual, outside the circle of this ruling elites; disagree with the ruling elites, he or she is considered an enemy of the State. Not only that; but the populace, who by definition in terms of politics of elites; are just political pawns in the hands of the ruling elites; are then quickly brought in as victims of this enemy as defined by the ruling elites. This is just to agitate the raw emotions of the permanent subaltern populace; as human foundations upon which, the immorality of the ruling elites rest. This is a heartless search for legitimacy and therefore, the legalisation of the illegal as it were.
The culture of zero-sum politics in the RoSS; does not allow the emergence of a constructive space and opportunity for human enlightenment. It encourages a kind of cal-de-sac political vision; which does not have a communitarian concept and practice. It is always about the self; as well as the selves in the groups. The reality of scarce resources in real life is taken as personal and group threat according to the logic of zero-sum politics which inform the politics of elites in the RoSS. Therefore; in order to succeed in this sordid political atmosphere; you have to dominate. On the other hand; in order to survive in this cruel political environment; you have to become an insurgent. Therefore; domination and insurrection become inseparable two faces of the political coin in the RoSS.
In the RoSS; PPTS are operationalised via the other institution of governance known as tribalism. The institution of tribalism (IT) is extremely rapacious in the RoSS. This rapaciousness of the IT is one of the explanatory variables for the near endemic PoDI in the RoSS. The IT has also introduced serious and dangerous doubts into many people’s minds in the RoSS, as regards the definition of liberation. Some peoples in the RoSS are genuinely wondering as to whether; others have literally replaced the near holy doctrine of self-determination with self-satisfaction. The ubiquitous phenomenon of zero-sum politics in the RoSS makes one to become overwhelmed with fear that; one is living in paradigms of organised crime. The exigencies of raw PoDI engender these feelings in many poor citizens of the RoSS.
Within the ambit of the PoDI; many individuals therein; avoid their human and legal responsibilities towards the subaltern others in the RoSS; and at the same time, these dominators want to be in charge of civil and political institutions on which many innocent human persons depend. The culture of political and civil domination is so endemic in many of our institutions in the RoSS; to the extent that, the behaviour threatens the integrity of these institutions, except that, the human persons put in charge of these institutions lack human capacity to recognise instances where integrity is in danger of being lost. One of the dangers of domination is that, once it gets hold of important political institutions in a country, it sets in a process of political decay that undermines many plans and policies upon which national development strategies are based. On the other hand; that is PPTS in play in the RoSS.
It is more alarming if domination is practiced by human persons who yesterday; were insurgents fighting against the general concept and practice of human domination. It is more hurting if these individuals were supposed to be the solid operatives and dynamos of political, civil, security, and social positive development processes in the RoSS. No human population would like to know that, political organisations upon which their lives depend are being managed by human persons who are dangerously reckless to the extent that, important matters are tackled on the basis of PoDI saturated in PPTS; and not on the basis of reasoned commitments within the available political, economic, and security resources. A political leadership that is entrenched in PoDI and saturated in PPTS is that kind of leadership that is permanently divided despite polemics and rhetoric of united leadership saturated in the spirit and letter of joint and collective responsibility needed by an effective political leadership.