Well....that's one opinion, I guess.Only qualification needed for libs is diversity. The more far out the better.
What miley cyrus will look like when she is 60 years old.She looks like Miley Cyrus?
Diversity is such nonsense. Whatever happened to competence, qualifications, and common sense?Well....that's one opinion, I guess.
Kinda hard to defend the logic, however, when one considers that the wingnuts are poised to nominate the most "far out" wingnuts in recent memory (i.e. Amy Coney Barrett) to the bench, any day now.
Obviously, there is no diversity among the wingnuts. About 90% of the party is white, male, evangelical (or right-wing Catholic) and rural/suburban. Coney Barrett represents "radical" diversity for you people, simple because she has ovaries.
Well....that's one opinion, I guess.
Kinda hard to defend the logic, however, when one considers that the wingnuts are poised to nominate the most "far out" wingnuts in recent memory (i.e. Amy Coney Barrett) to the bench, any day now.
Obviously, there is no diversity among the wingnuts. About 90% of the party is white, male, evangelical (or right-wing Catholic) and rural/suburban. Coney Barrett represents "radical" diversity for you people, simple because she has ovaries.
Diversity is such nonsense. Whatever happened to competence, qualifications, and common sense?
Do you know what the manifest destiny is? Americans thought they were doing gods work by expanding and killing the natives. The south used the bible to justify slavery.First off, the civilizing of the Native Americans was a moral good. It was not genocide and it was not slaughter and to claim that is pure historical ignorance on your part.
Secondly your claim that the north was not very religious prior to the Civil War, is absolutely false. In fact the north east was the Home to all the most aggressive and puritanical forms of Protestant Christianity.
Also, it was not religious Christians in the English colonies that held slaves, the slavery in North America was predominantly driven by educated Men following Enlightenment principles. For lack of a better term, actually it is a perfect term, they were the liberals of their era who owns slaves.
Slavery has practiced in Catholic colonies in the Americas, was far more restrictive to the slaveowners, slaves had many more ways to be free, and The church never condoned to the practice.
You mean the mainstream political and moral views in effect when America became a power will destroy it? Lol
Diversity is such nonsense. Whatever happened to competence, qualifications, and common sense?
Do you know what the manifest destiny is? Americans thought they were doing gods work by expanding and killing the natives. The south used the bible to justify slavery.
Democrats nominated, ran and elected a mixed-race President, now you want them to be racist against mixed race people? Didn't think that one through, did you.She has mixed race children so of course most white Democrats will rant she is unfit for public office. The racism against her by the Democratic Party for her children is going to be so rabid that it will even be embarrassing to Democratic Party KKK chapters for the level of pure racist hatred.
First off, the civilizing of the Native Americans was a moral good. It was not genocide and it was not slaughter and to claim that is pure historical ignorance on your part.
Secondly your claim that the north was not very religious prior to the Civil War, is absolutely false. In fact the north east was the Home to all the most aggressive and puritanical forms of Protestant Christianity.
Also, it was not religious Christians in the English colonies that held slaves, the slavery in North America was predominantly driven by educated Men following Enlightenment principles. For lack of a better term, actually it is a perfect term, they were the liberals of their era who owns slaves.
Slavery has practiced in Catholic colonies in the Americas, was far more restrictive to the slaveowners, slaves had many more ways to be free, and The church never condoned to the practice.
You mean the mainstream political and moral views in effect when America became a power will destroy it? Lol
Mind-boggling, innit? Remember how the right wing all blew a gasket when the Democrats ran and elected a mixed-race President?I know, right? Just like they think DeBlasio is bad for having mixed race children.
Why do you derp the stupid constantly?
Do you know what the manifest destiny is? Americans thought they were doing gods work by expanding and killing the natives. The south used the bible to justify slavery.
LOL. The trail of tears is US reneging on its obligation. The SCOTUS told andrew jackson that he could not move the cherokee west and he did it anyway.No, manifest destiny did not include wiping out the natives
There was never any policy promulgated by the US to wipe out any native Americans. Some Indians were savage evil bands of people who wouldn’t act in a civilized manner (such as the Comanche) and they had to be quelled with force. Some tribes signed treaties to relocate and then attempted to renege (the so called “trail of tears”) but no part of manifest destiny was the elimination of American Indians as a whole.
Some secular liberals in the south used the bible to defend slavery in much the same way some revisionists today insist it supports abortion and same sex marriage, it was prooftexting and not a legitimate theological argument
Civilizing primitive people is never moral or good. It ruins their lives.First off, the civilizing of the Native Americans was a moral good. It was not genocide and it was not slaughter and to claim that is pure historical ignorance on your part.
Secondly your claim that the north was not very religious prior to the Civil War, is absolutely false. In fact the north east was the Home to all the most aggressive and puritanical forms of Protestant Christianity.
Also, it was not religious Christians in the English colonies that held slaves, the slavery in North America was predominantly driven by educated Men following Enlightenment principles. For lack of a better term, actually it is a perfect term, they were the liberals of their era who owns slaves.
Slavery has practiced in Catholic colonies in the Americas, was far more restrictive to the slaveowners, slaves had many more ways to be free, and The church never condoned to the practice.
You mean the mainstream political and moral views in effect when America became a power will destroy it? Lol
Oh, you mean when your white supremacist parents and grand parents were still roaming the earth? You mean, back when they comprised 90% of the population, and ruled by terrorism and intimidation?You mean the mainstream political and moral views in effect when America became a power will destroy it? Lol
The Major Role The Catholic Church Played in Slavery
The Catholic Church played a vital role in the trans-Atlantic slave trade, according to historians and several published thesiis on the topic.amsterdamnews.com
Oh, you mean when your white supremacist parents and grand parents were still roaming the earth? You mean, back when they comprised 90% of the population, and ruled by terrorism and intimidation?
Wake up, Rip Van Winkle.
Times have changed.
In 20 years, you and your ilk will be in the minority. The Americans who actually believed in the values professed in our founding documents....and whose blood and sweat actually forced change....will be taking over for you and your dying breed, very soon. It's already happening. You know this. And there's very little you people can do about it. That's why white nationalism is the primary source of terrorist activity in this country. You people are scared. And when you get scared, you ALWAY resort to terroristic tactics. History proves that.
Best to be a left wing ideologue, eh?...and Mashmont deflects and dodges, once again.
So much for all of that moronic nonsense about her being considered "among the most brilliant lawyers" and "best judges in the nation". I guess you realized you couldn't back that crap up, pretty quickly, huh?
Barrett is just like almost every other conservative justice these days....a mediocre talent, but a hardcore ideologue. Those attributes...plus her ovaries and plain-Jane face...make her perfect for Trump's base of frustrated, angry white incel types.
Civilizing primitive people is never moral or good. It ruins their lives.
Diversity is such nonsense. Whatever happened to competence, qualifications, and common sense?
No. I'm that guy who knows what the story in Genesis means.No it doesn’t.
You were that guy who Rousseau and actually believed man was born free were You?
Amy Coney Barrett is not far right. She would’ve been center left 40 years ago
Typical rightwinger.Best to be a left wing ideologue, eh?
I’m glad you got that off your chest
Didn't you know? Physical attractiveness is an essential qualification for any job a woman aspires to. Ugly women should be kept on the fringes of society and only allowed in places where nobody sees them.There is no universe (not even the right-wing/alt-right universe) in which Barrett is considered "among the most brilliant lawyers", nor "one of the best judges in the nation". She's a hardcore right-wing, anti-abortion ideologue...with ovaries. Those are her qualifications. Everyone understands that.
And what kind of cretin would even consider physical attractiveness as a criteria (for, or against) in choosing a USSC justice? This just lends insight into the mentality of the lonely white dudes who make up Trump's base.
No. I'm that guy who knows what the story in Genesis means.
Primitive people live in a state of innocence. In the garden. Hunters and gatherers. When they learned about agriculture it ruined their lives. Remember, after Adam and Eve learned to tell good from evil their sons became agriculturalists, Cain a planter and Able a herder. Agriculture made two things possible, living crowded together in cities (civil means cities) and creating a surplus. All of mankinds problems come from two questions- who will rule the city and who will control the surplus. That's what the story of the loss of Eden means. That's what civilization means, the loss of innocence.
When civilized people encounter primitive people and remove their innocence the are playing the role of the serpent in the garden.
Not on any planet in this solar system.
40 years ago, the USSC was the most liberal it had ever been....in HISTORY. Coney-Barrett is so radical that she would have never been considered. She's to the right of ANYONE on The Court in 1980.
If nominated, she will be to the right of everyone, save, perhaps, Clarence Thomas on the current USSC. She's an extremist, and there is no liberal counterpart to her on the current court. You people can't see, or acknowledge that, because you are extremists, as well.
It depends on what you mean by ugly, people born with birth defects or who have burns on their face or not ugly. However feminist should absolutely be kept on the fringes of societyDidn't you know? Physical attractiveness is an essential qualification for any job a woman aspires to. Ugly women should be kept on the fringes of society and only allowed in places where nobody sees them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?