• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The old lady takes a dive!

Fishking said:
You're right, the narrative about violent leftists mobs harassing, intimidating, and committing acts of violence against Trump supporters is well documented. That will never change.
Click to expand...

Lol. Yea.. that's the narrative for sure. Liberals are apparently simultaneously violent, harrassing, dictatorial demons and also feckless, effeminate cuckolds. Which one will you guys go with tomorrow?
 
vash1012 said:
Lol. Yea.. that's the narrative for sure. Liberals are apparently simultaneously violent, harrassing, dictatorial demons and also feckless, effeminate cuckolds. Which one will you guys go with tomorrow?
Click to expand...

:shrug:

It wasn't Hillary and Bernie rallies that had opposition mobs attacking them on such extreme levels that riot police were needed.
 
Fishking said:
:shrug:

It wasn't Hillary and Bernie rallies that had opposition mobs attacking them on such extreme levels that riot police were needed.
Click to expand...

And it wasn't Hillary or Bernie rallies that had videos of attendees punching and kicking black protesters and calling them n*ggers etc. Youre citing one instance. The theme of violence was at repeated Trump rallies and encouraged by Trump publicly in well documented instances. That's called a narrative. One instance is not a narrative. Words actually have meanings you know.
 
Last edited:
vash1012 said:
And it wasn't Hillary or Bernie rallies that had videos of attendees punching and kicking black protesters and calling them n*ggers etc. Youre citing one instance. The theme of violence was at repeated Trump rallies and encouraged by Trump publicly in well documented instances. That's called a narrative. One instance is not a narrative. Words actually have meanings you know.
Click to expand...

Uh...no. I'm not citing one instance. A large number of Trump rallies were mobbed. And you want to know why you didn't see anyone at Hillary or Bernie rallies being punched? Because there wasn't a bunch of mobs, protesters, and provocateurs attacking them all the time. You know, it's kinda hard for something to happen when the situation doesn't even exist.

 
Fishking said:
Uh...no. I'm not citing one instance. A large number of Trump rallies were mobbed. And you want to know why you didn't see anyone at Hillary or Bernie rallies being punched? Because there wasn't a bunch of mobs, protesters, and provocateurs attacking them all the time. You know, it's kinda hard for something to happen when the situation doesn't even exist.

Click to expand...


People aren't protesting Bernie rallies because he isn't an openly racist and xenophobic provocateur. People did protest hillary rallies but hillary rallies are like 80 quiet people in a room. The video you posted was from the same one instance I was talking about. Where are the repeated accounts of MOBS attacking Trump rallies requiring Riot teams to break them up that you referenced in the original post? Again, that was one time. No one is disputing there aren't protesters at the Trump rallies and there deserves to be protesters at Trump rallies. He's worth protesting. I'm disputing YOUR claim that the narrative about Trump rallies should be that leftist mobs are repeatedly violently attacking them to the extent police have to come with riot gear and break that up. I said that happened one time and is thus not a narrative whereas Trump supporters violently assaulting protesters and Trump egging them on IS a narrative because it happens repeatedly.
 
vash1012 said:
People aren't protesting Bernie rallies because he isn't an openly racist and xenophobic provocateur. People did protest hillary rallies but hillary rallies are like 80 quiet people in a room. The video you posted was from the same one instance I was talking about. Where are the repeated accounts of MOBS attacking Trump rallies requiring Riot teams to break them up that you referenced in the original post? Again, that was one time. No one is disputing there aren't protesters at the Trump rallies and there deserves to be protesters at Trump rallies. He's worth protesting. I'm disputing YOUR claim that the narrative about Trump rallies should be that leftist mobs are repeatedly violently attacking them to the extent police have to come with riot gear and break that up. I said that happened one time and is thus not a narrative whereas Trump supporters violently assaulting protesters and Trump egging them on IS a narrative because it happens repeatedly.
Click to expand...

"One time". That's rich. I also notice you've already excused it because "it's deserved". Sorry, but attacking people participating in the political process is never "deserved" in a country that supposedly free. This shouldn't look like a 3rd world election out in the streets.

Here is one is San Diego.

 
Here's one from Fresno.

 
Fishking said:
"One time". That's rich. I also notice you've already excused it because "it's deserved". Sorry, but attacking people participating in the political process is never "deserved" in a country that supposedly free. This shouldn't look like a 3rd world election out in the streets.

Here is one is San Diego.

Click to expand...


I said protesting him was deserved. Not violence. You are the one excusing violence by denying the violent nature of Trump's rhetoric and rallies and attempting to flip it to a one sided view of leftist mobs causing all the problems. I'm not denying there are protesters at Trump rallies, or that sometimes there are incidences of violence between protesters and supporters. I was simply stating a FACT that there is a violent narrative following Trump rallies. It is also a FACT that Trump has encouraged this violence. You can try to make this one sided all you want, but its not.
 
Last edited:
EvaPeron said:
Please just explain to us this. What would you say if the lady came to you and admitted the truth. Would that be okay in your eyes for this to have happened? Would you at least then open your eyes to what is really happening? Would it make a difference? Would you still support someone this corrupt?
Click to expand...

Eva...what you are experiencing from these posters is BLIND LOYALTY.

They are 100% totally BLIND to any actual truth that shows their candidate in a negative light.

You are wasting your time if you are trying to get them to open their eyes or see the reality of the situation.

That is why it is called BLIND LOYALTY.

I will be voting for Trump, but I can also see what a blowhard, control freak he is. I see and acknowledge all those negatives, and will not deny them.

but I will still be voting for him.

With Hillary people, they REFUSE to see any of her negatives or admit to any of them.

That is the major difference between them and us.

I know my candidate is NOT the next Messiah, yet almost all Hillary supporters believe her to be anointed by a higher power to rule us all for life.

You are wasting your time if you are trying to get them to admit she has any faults. They REFUSE to do so, or say, yes, but Trump.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom