An excellent question. Which of the two scenarios sexually excites your fellow MAGA more?
Not the first time that happens. It's always safer to bash really small minorities.
I think an "oppressible minority" is usually around 10%, like in 1930s Germany. So the anti-trans people can be expected to pivot to full on LGBT etc. hatred.
Who said anything about getting sexually excited at all, and why are you compelled to guide the conversation in that direction? All I wanted to do was get clarity on the question.
This information is useful for monetizing MAGA. If we can better understand what turns them on, we can craft slogans that convince them to over-pay for low quality t-shirts. So, which in your opinion is the greater sexual turn-on?
Liberals stupidly flailing around trying to make Tyler Robinson a straight right-winger.
Excellent. This is great feedback. How much would you pay for a t-shirt depicting Tyler Robinson as a trans-lover, and would you pay more if he himself were depicted as transitioning, or is it sufficient to represent him as having affections for somebody else who is? If his partner were depicted as non-white, would that be worth a few extra dollars?
Why would I pay anything for your shirt?
Not my shirt, Doanld's. He'll be the one selling it to you.
I'm saying you haven't posted a single remotely intelligent, witty, or interesting remark in this exchange, and so I'm bored.
That's so very sad. Have you considered asking Laura Loomer to entertain you? She recently advocated turning all immigrants into alligator food - would that be the sort of thing to excite you, physically or otherwise?I'm saying you haven't posted a single remotely intelligent, witty, or interesting remark in this exchange, and so I'm bored.
I see you're butthurt by ICE activity. Thanks for letting me know.
