- Joined
- Sep 11, 2021
- Messages
- 9,694
- Reaction score
- 3,288
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Csm:
What do you think a US President should do in this situation? If President Biden is making the wrong moves in this "very scary" crisis, what do you think are the right moves?
Cheers and be well.
Evilroddy.
It appears the simple part is the posterSimple really.
A strong response instead of a weak indecisive response.
"When debate is lost slander becomes the tool of the loser"It appears the simple part is the poster
Simple really.
A strong response instead of a weak indecisive response.
Bidens response:What does this mean in actual practical terms? What is a “strong response”? Name an actual policy you’d like to see enacted.
Slander requires a false statement. I don't see one in MY post.It appears the simple part is the poster
Bidens response:
"The nature of the response depends on the nature of the use.”
A strong response:
WMD in Ukraine is unacceptable and is a game changer in United States policy in this war. If Putin wants to feel the might of America's military this is how to make that happen.
You want a red line right? Where should he draw it? Ambiguity is very necessary in this "scarry crisis".Simple really.
A strong response instead of a weak indecisive response.
I watched the press conference and heard his comments in full. I thought he was saying if they act inside Ukraine or go into Russia is the thing that depends. I was relieved to hear an unequivocal Yes, we will respond.Simple really.
A strong response instead of a weak indecisive response.
did Russia invade anybody while the reckless orange maniac were there. ?jesus, let's just thank (the alleged) god that we have responsible adults in the White House at this moment in time.
Just SCARY AS HELL to think about where things could stand right now if that reckless orange maniac and his corrupt, pathetic band of republican yes men were still in there...
I don't think that's a bad answer. Don't want to paint yourself into a corner.Another weak response by Biden much like his "minor incursion" remark that emboldened Putin before he ultimately invaded. Now he makes the same mistake and gives Putin incentive to use WMD. We couldn't have a worse president at this extremely critical point in his and Putin will likely use WMD very soon because of it. Biden being president of America is "very scary".
"We will respond if he uses it,” Biden said, referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin. “The nature of the response depends on the nature of the use.”
"Russia has a long track record of accusing others of what they are either already doing or about to do, and that is the kind of projection that we’ve seen in the last couple of weeks. And it’s very scary,” Biden said in an interview Tuesday."
Biden says U.S. would 'respond' to Russia if Putin uses chemical or biological weapons
President Joe Biden said Thursday NATO would respond "in kind" if Russia uses weapons of mass destruction in Ukraine.www.cnbc.com
Respond with what? More sanctions?I watched the press conference and heard his comments in full. I thought he was saying if they act inside Ukraine or go into Russia is the thing that depends. I was relieved to hear an unequivocal Yes, we will respond.
That’s not any more meaningful than anything Biden said.
What does “unacceptable” and “a game changer” mean in practical terms? Advocate for an actual policy.
That’s not any more meaningful than anything Biden said.
What does “unacceptable” and “a game changer” mean in practical terms? Advocate for an actual policy.
Putin wants to feel the might of America's military this is how to make that happen.
You do want to paint Putin into a corner.I don't think that's a bad answer. Don't want to paint yourself into a corner.
Ambiguity is why Putin invaded Ukraine. If Biden would have said we will not let Putin win in Ukraine and flooded Ukraine with weapons as we conducted diplomacy Putin wouldn’t have invaded.You want a red line right? Where should he draw it? Ambiguity is very necessary in this "scarry crisis".
He did. This was last year.Ambiguity is why Putin invaded Ukraine. If Biden would have said we will not let Putin win in Ukraine and flooded Ukraine with weapons as we conducted diplomacy Putin wouldn’t have invaded.
It is not slander to corrector point out that you have no ****ing clue what you are talking about, and are just a parrot for right wing loser bullshit."When debate is lost slander becomes the tool of the loser"
I prefer a tepid response to challenging a cornered mad dog with enough nuclear weapons to destroy life as we know it on this planet.Bidens response:
"The nature of the response depends on the nature of the use.”
A strong response:
WMD in Ukraine is unacceptable and is a game changer in United States policy in this war. If Putin wants to feel the might of America's military this is how to make that happen.
Oh. The reporter asked if NATO would respond militarily and he said yes. So I thought he meant militarily.Respond with what? More sanctions?
It means what it says. A military response. Saying exactly what that would be would be stupid.@Chainsawmassacre
You still haven’t given any specific policy. What does “feel the might of the American military” mean?
Full scale war ending with mutual nuclear destruction?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?