- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 83,700
- Reaction score
- 58,404
- Location
- New Mexico
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Well now that we've heard over a year of this bullcrap ad nauseam... the stats are finally out. And claims of Obamacare killing full time jobs are now officially debunked.
The Myth That Obamacare Is Destroying Full-Time Jobs Just Got Debunked
According to the BLS household survey, part-time jobs fell 594,000 in September while full-time workers were up 691,000.
Well now that we've heard over a year of this bullcrap ad nauseam... the stats are finally out. And claims of Obamacare killing full time jobs are now officially debunked.
The Myth That Obamacare Is Destroying Full-Time Jobs Just Got Debunked
According to the BLS household survey, part-time jobs fell 594,000 in September while full-time workers were up 691,000.
Well now that we've heard over a year of this bullcrap ad nauseam... the stats are finally out. And claims of Obamacare killing full time jobs are now officially debunked.
The Myth That Obamacare Is Destroying Full-Time Jobs Just Got Debunked
According to the BLS household survey, part-time jobs fell 594,000 in September while full-time workers were up 691,000.
Looking at one month seems to be pretty stupid. For example, it would not account for seasonality. Such as part time summer jobs going away and teachers going back to work.
Business people are rational. If you say that instead of hiring 3 people to work 120 hours you get to save several thousand per worker if you hire 4 people working 30 hours ( a bit less to fall under the threshold) then guess what the good manager will do.
Well now that we've heard over a year of this bullcrap ad nauseam... the stats are finally out. And claims of Obamacare killing full time jobs are now officially debunked.
The Myth That Obamacare Is Destroying Full-Time Jobs Just Got Debunked
According to the BLS household survey, part-time jobs fell 594,000 in September while full-time workers were up 691,000.
Perhaps these people would dispute the BLS?
100 Unintended Consequences of Obamacare | National Review Online
Obamacare doesn't go into full effect until January, and I thought businesses had until 2015 to comply. It gets too confusing with what ever ACA pardons and commutations are out there since the Obamabot has issued so many with an election coming on and all.
Perhaps these people would dispute the BLS?
100 Unintended Consequences of Obamacare | National Review Online
Who ya gonna believe, posts by Obama worshipping Liberals from questionable sources or YOUR OWN EYES?
Absolute nonsense.
Well now that we've heard over a year of this bullcrap ad nauseam... the stats are finally out. And claims of Obamacare killing full time jobs are now officially debunked.
The Myth That Obamacare Is Destroying Full-Time Jobs Just Got Debunked
According to the BLS household survey, part-time jobs fell 594,000 in September while full-time workers were up 691,000.
The overall trend is that part time employment is going up, but so is full time employment:
View attachment 67155680
The numbers reported are basically just statistical noise.
There have been many reports of people being forced to go part time, but apparently that's a small part of the total picture.
I don't think there's any doubt that the ACA is suppressing job growth. I've never heard of employers hiring more people if it costs them a lot more to do so. That would sort of fly in the face of the liberal view of business people, would it not? :2razz:
Who ya gonna believe, posts by Obama Liberals from questionable sources or YOUR OWN EYES?
Absolute nonsense.
The overall trend is that part time employment is going up, but so is full time employment:
View attachment 67155680
The numbers reported are basically just statistical noise.
There have been many reports of people being forced to go part time, but apparently that's a small part of the total picture.
I don't think there's any doubt that the ACA is suppressing job growth. I've never heard of employers hiring more people if it costs them a lot more to do so. That would sort of fly in the face of the liberal view of business people, would it not? :2razz:
Unless they need they for profit. Frankly, growth is not related to these things that much. If people are spending money, there. Will be growth, regardless.
However, if anyone really buys this suppression argument, they should be arguing for UHC. That would remove healthcare from employment.
The increase in taxes that UHC would require would pretty much negate any advantages where economic growth is concerned.
Wait... if you are admitting that the effects of Obamacare aren't going to have any effect until the future, why is the the GOP keeps referring to how disastrous Obamacare has been in past tense all the time?
How can you say that it IS suppressing job growth if the law doesn't go into effect until next year?
Who ya gonna believe, posts by Obama Liberals from questionable sources or YOUR OWN EYES?
Absolute nonsense.
The increase in taxes that UHC would require would pretty much negate any advantages where economic growth is concerned. Unless they are talking about some really draconian rationing of medical care, which people are not going to stand for.
Businesses typically look ahead 6 to 12 months to adjust for changes in the business environment. That's why people are already being forced to go part time and people have already lost their coverage. They are not going to wait until the day that the ACA goes live to make these adjustments.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?