The myth of the ‘anchor baby’ deportation defense

[natsb]

[h=1]The myth of the ‘anchor baby’ deportation defense[/h]
Here's what illegal aliens who have a child born in the US have to do to make that baby a true "anchor baby" that allows them to stay in the USA:

Don't you think DAPA would mitigate bullet points 2,3,and 4? In essence, the parents would get to stay where they are and skip the whole going home part.

 

[Fearandloathing]

[h=1]The myth of the ‘anchor baby’ deportation defense[/h]
Here's what illegal aliens who have a child born in the US have to do to make that baby a true "anchor baby" that allows them to stay in the USA:

Only in America....


You now not only have a term for children born of illegal aliens, but a controversy over it as well.

Spend days filling this one guys, but it's so ****ing swamp land backward the world is laughing...their guts out.

You see, America is all over the world providing safety and security, bringing democracy to nation's with oil, meanwhile you make it easy and convenient to expand your population by letting anyone at all walk across a border and give birth.

On another thread, I had to deal with an American who said Canada was "backward" because the city of Vancouver years ago passed a referendum banning freeways in the city - we do not want to look like LA. That's "Backward" but having to neologize an entire new lexicon to deal with the fall out of deliberately ignoring your own laws is "progress".

Sorry, but this is funnier than any stand up comedy I have seen. How cool is it to go around asking people of their an "Anchor Baby" or were born without having to screw the system.

From education to finance to governance...all ****ed to the tits and the solution is top argue about the political correctness.

Try something Canada does.....deport them

 

[clownboy]

And, they shouldn't .

But still, they don't get any special privileges for being illegal, as is being implied. They don't qualify for most government benefits. They do get free public education. Schools can't even ask about their legal status.

It is the employers of illegals who are the problem. Fine them and illegal immigration will mostly go away.

We've been over this a bunch. Employers are only part of the problem and we already do fine them.

 

[American]

[h=1]The myth of the ‘anchor baby’ deportation defense[/h]
Here's what illegal aliens who have a child born in the US have to do to make that baby a true "anchor baby" that allows them to stay in the USA:

And it is true that some people -- such as breast-feeding mothers, children brought to the United States illegally as children and others -- have benefited from the immigration system equivalent of proprietorial discretion, known as "deferred action."

:yt .

 

[Bodi]

You probably should have read some of these. First link is misleading. Citizens are eligible for WIC and SNAP. Illegal immigrants, not.

From the first link:

Yes. It is true that illegal aliens have received grants, professional accreditations, loans, WIC, disability, public housing, college educations, food stamps, unemployment benefits, and tax credits from state and federal agencies.

Law Dictionary: Why is it that Illegal Aliens Get Free Food Stamps, Health Insurance and Pay No Taxes?

You did manage to discover that K-12 schooling is given to illegal immigrants, as is emergency care(in both cases it is given to every one in the country). However, drivers licenses are given to some illegal immigrants in some states based on state law. It is a small number of states(10 to be exact). So basically, what you failed to find, is much in the way of government benefits going to illegal aliens.

Education, medical, drivers licenses... = government funding.

Doesn't look like I failed in the slightest.

 

[jamesrage]

[h=1]The myth of the ‘anchor baby’ deportation defense[/h]
Here's what illegal aliens who have a child born in the US have to do to make that baby a true "anchor baby" that allows them to stay in the USA:

While that is true that is not what happens.What happens is that piece of **** anti-American **** suckers say "you can't separate families, the kid needs to stay here and so does his or her family in order to take care of that kid".

 

[Dittohead not!]

We've been over this a bunch. Employers are only part of the problem and we already do fine them.

Only very rarely.

 

[Dittohead not!]

While that is true that is not what happens.What happens is that piece of **** anti-American **** suckers say "you can't separate families, the kid needs to stay here and so does his or her family in order to take care of that kid".

They may say that, but the solution is to send the kid home with the parents. That will keep the family together.

 

[jamesrage]

They may say that, but the solution is to send the kid home with the parents. That will keep the family together.

That is true and how it should be,especially seeing how parents are the ones ultimately responsible for their kids. But anti-American **** suckers say the kid is an American, you can't deport him and so should that kid's family should stay here in order to take care of that kid.Heck we can see examples of this in threads debating birthright citizenship and the INS act of 1965 that allows for the chain migration of relatives other than spouse and minor children.

 

[Dittohead not!]

That is true and how it should be,especially seeing how parents are the ones ultimately responsible for their kids. But anti-American **** suckers say the kid is an American, you can't deport him and so should that kid's family should stay here in order to take care of that kid.Heck we can see examples of this in threads debating birthright citizenship and the INS act of 1965 that allows for the chain migration of relatives other than spouse and minor children.

People say that, but does it actually work that way? Having a baby, or any famly member, who is a citizen doesn't mean that the whole family is legally allowed to stay.

 

[jamesrage]

People say that, but does it actually work that way? Having a baby, or any famly member, who is a citizen doesn't mean that the whole family is legally allowed to stay.

Have there been families with minor anchor babies that were deported without their child or their child taken with them when they were deported?

 

[Dittohead not!]

Have there been families with minor anchor babies that were deported without their child or their child taken with them when they were deported?

Not that I know of. I think they deport the whole family if they catch them.

Catching them is the problem.

 

[274ina]

Details of a law they ignore, just like section 274 of the INA.
Just like every other section of the INA.