The joke of academic journals

[P_T]

Who ironically also published a paper called "The Micropsychiatric Applications of Thiotimoline". He was even asked ab out it at his doctoral dissertation.

"And .......... I,ROBOT .......... Now I got Ai right here beside me named Co-pilot ...... Then there's ... LEO ...... Seri ....... etc.

 

[Oozlefinch]

"And .......... I,ROBOT .......... Now I got Ai right here beside me named Co-pilot ...... Then there's ... LEO ...... Seri ....... etc.

And for the most part, AI is pretty easy to recognize once you know what to look for. But you are right, there have been AI written papers accepted by "peer reviewed" journals. Far too often, all that matters when it comes to getting published is that what is written is what they want to see.

 

[NolanVoyd]

During the lockdown I discovered Joe Rogan's podcast. I remember him from Newsradio back in the 90's and of course "Fear Factor". I perused his non-MMA and comedian catalog and found quite a few really interesting interviews. This is one of them. I've always been a bit of a cynic about peer reviewed journals touting academic papers. I understand how these papers are a needed vice in collegiate professor tenure as well as gaining grant money for specific disciplines. But no other podcast have I chuckled as much (maybe Bobcat Goldthwait was a close second). Basically these two characters decided to submit peer reviewed papers on absurd topics with clearly insane conclusions, and amazingly seven were published and one got an award ( "Human Reactions to Rape Culture and Queer Performativity at Urban Dog Parks in Portland, Oregon" ) They also pulled out parts of Mien Kampf and replaced words to correlate with intersectional feminism, also peer reviewed and published. I applaud them for making a mockery of academic journals, as these peer reviewed papers are generally worthless gibberish meant to stroke other academic's ego's for their career progress. That legitimate published journals rival the hoaxes and even surpass them demolishes any legitimacy these peer reviewed papers had.

Other peer reviewed and published papers by the hoaxters:
"Who Are They to Judge? Overcoming Anthropometry and a Framework for Fat Bodybuilding"
"Going in Through the Back Door: Challenging Straight Male Homohysteria and Transphobia through Receptive Penetrative Sex Toy Use"
"An Ethnography of Breastaurant Masculinity: Themes of Objectification, Sexual Conquest, Male Control, and Masculine Toughness in a Sexually Objectifying Restaurant"

Here's the 26 minute interview with Rogan





Here's the background video about the three and why they did it

Joe Rogan is a joke. A raging hypocrite.

Here is your proof. Embarrassing proof

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

During the lockdown I discovered Joe Rogan's podcast. I remember him from Newsradio back in the 90's and of course "Fear Factor". I perused his non-MMA and comedian catalog and found quite a few really interesting interviews. This is one of them. I've always been a bit of a cynic about peer reviewed journals touting academic papers. I understand how these papers are a needed vice in collegiate professor tenure as well as gaining grant money for specific disciplines. But no other podcast have I chuckled as much (maybe Bobcat Goldthwait was a close second). Basically these two characters decided to submit peer reviewed papers on absurd topics with clearly insane conclusions, and amazingly seven were published and one got an award ( "Human Reactions to Rape Culture and Queer Performativity at Urban Dog Parks in Portland, Oregon" ) They also pulled out parts of Mien Kampf and replaced words to correlate with intersectional feminism, also peer reviewed and published. I applaud them for making a mockery of academic journals, as these peer reviewed papers are generally worthless gibberish meant to stroke other academic's ego's for their career progress. That legitimate published journals rival the hoaxes and even surpass them demolishes any legitimacy these peer reviewed papers had.

Other peer reviewed and published papers by the hoaxters:
"Who Are They to Judge? Overcoming Anthropometry and a Framework for Fat Bodybuilding"
"Going in Through the Back Door: Challenging Straight Male Homohysteria and Transphobia through Receptive Penetrative Sex Toy Use"
"An Ethnography of Breastaurant Masculinity: Themes of Objectification, Sexual Conquest, Male Control, and Masculine Toughness in a Sexually Objectifying Restaurant"

Here's the 26 minute interview with Rogan





Here's the background video about the three and why they did it

So you've based your global opinion of ALL academic journals and academic papers on "Human Reactions to Rape Culture and Queer Performativity at Urban Dog Parks in Portland, Oregon" and other mockeries as presented on Joe Rogan.

 

[P_T]

The Campus Security raid the Fraternity every Friday night.
This routine goes on for Decades, every Friday night!
One Year the College decides to stop the Crap.
No longer will they raid the Fraternities to try to find young girls.
So many years pass, the young girls are free to go to Fraternities.
They know they will no longer be outraged and embarrassed.
They will never have to hear, "she's under there looking for her ring."
__________________________________________________ ____________
The new business is opening and one of the owner's friends sends flowers for the occasion.
The flowers are delivered to the business site and the owner glances at the card; it says, "Rest in Peace." Have you heard this one?
The owner calls the florist to complain. After he alerts the florist of the obvious mistake and how upset
he is, the florist says, "Sir, I'm really sorry for the mistake, but rather than being upset can you imagine this:
somewhere there is a funeral taking place today, and they have flowers with a note saying,
"Congratulations on your new location."
__________________________________________________ ___________________________________
Does anyone know what food causes the most grief?
Can anyone explain the pain and suffering that food causes?
How about the many years after partaking of even a small piece?
So, Lil Johnny now an elder raises his hand and says,
"Sure, Our many wedding Cakes!"
__________________________________________________ _____________________
The day after delivery, I receive a call from the Partner
He's telling me his cell phone didn't work. He says, "I
charged it overnight just like the Directions say,
but it doesn't work this morning, it won't power up.

I ask, " EXACTLY what did you do with the phone?"
"I took it out, plugged the charger into the wall and into the phone."
"Did you put the battery in the phone?" "Not the extra one."

"Lew, the phone only has one battery."


(Pause) "Oh, I think I know what's wrong with it."
__________________________________________________ ____
Friday, tomorrow night is date night! It may be your opportunity. What grown up Orphan Annie would say!
_______________________________________________________________________________

 

[P_T]

"Sink O' DeMayo" Sure It's a

Classic example of how a super Mod ruins a thread!

 

[paul342160]

Peer reviewd articles in STEM fields are highly regarded in STEM fields.

I co-editted three to five books in a STEM field; and I have co-authored 10 to 15 technical papers in a STEM field in the past.
I still teach; but I haven't published recently. Most technical papers are very specialized and only interest less than 200 technical experts
[nternationally.

 

[NolanVoyd]

Peer reviewd articles in STEM fields are highly regarded in STEM fields.

I co-editted three to five books in a STEM field; and I have co-authored 10 to 15 technical papers in a STEM field in the past.
I still teach; but I haven't published recently. Most technical papers are very specialized and only interest less than 200 technical experts
[nternationally.

Did you co-edit three books, four books, or five books?

And did you co-author 10 technical papers? Or 15?

Why "three to five"? Why "10 to 15??

Can't you remember?

 

[paul342160]

Nolan, It was four books , 12 technical papers. and one Ph.D. thesis.

 

[NolanVoyd]

Nolan, It was four books , 12 technical papers. and one Ph.D. thesis.

So why did you say "3-5" and to "10 - 15"?

Seems like you are full of it.

 

[Lisa]

Let's see them publish a physics or math paper.

Who is giving any credence to what Joe Rogan is saying about academic journals or higher education?

He attended the University of Massachusetts Boston but found the endeavor "pointless" and dropped out early.

Wiki/rogan.

 

[DCCougar]

I applaud them for making a mockery of academic journals, as these peer reviewed papers are generally worthless gibberish meant to stroke other academic's ego's for their career progress.

I guess that's in keeping with the Republican platform -- bash the universities, call them "elites," keep your base poorly educated, ignorant, naive, and stupid, which is the only way anyone would vote for a pathological liar, massive fraudster, misogynist, sexual assaulter, and psychopath.