Fledermaus
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 132,094
- Reaction score
- 36,379
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Reread my words.
If you are gullible, naive and/or a resident of LaLaLand you ability to think critically has been destroyed .
Of course if you are a member of any of those entities then you are compromised by interest
No Sir - UN Resolution 181 was NEVER approved by the UN Security Council
"Because the UNGA’s resolutions are recommendations and not legally binding according to the UN Charter, the World accepted that the UNGA resolution 181 as a recommendation and not legally binding."
https://jusoorpost.com/en/posts/366...ns are,recommendation and not legally binding.
In other words ENGLISH COMPREHENSION IS NOT YOUR FORTEIn other words the UN resolution is what happened.
UN
Not USA.
Semantics. Israel declared itself independent and won the ensuing war to prove it. Had nothing to do with the USA.No Sir - UN Resolution 181 was NEVER approved by the UN Security Council
"Because the UNGA’s resolutions are recommendations and not legally binding according to the UN Charter, the World accepted that the UNGA resolution 181 as a recommendation and not legally binding."
https://jusoorpost.com/en/posts/36627/a-binding-resolution-of-the-united-nations-general-assembly-for-the-united-nations-security-council-the-united-nations-general-assembly-resolution-181#:~:text=Because the UNGA's resolutions are,recommendation and not legally binding.
Reread my words.
If you are gullible, naive and/or a resident of LaLaLand you ability to think critically has been destroyed .
Of course if you are a member of any of those entities then you are compromised by interest
In other words ENGLISH COMPREHENSION IS NOT YOUR FORTE
"Because the UNGA’s resolutions >>>>>>>>are recommendations and not legally binding <<<<<<<according to the UN Charter, the World accepted that the UNGA resolution 181 as a recommendation and not legally binding."
ONLY the UN Security Council has the authority to issue legally binding declarations.
Israel has IGNORED UN RESOLUTIONS WHEN CONVENIENT TO DO SO
There was no coup d’etat. Trump is as complicit in this as anybody. His rhetoric against Iran was always bellicose going all the way back to his 2016 campaign. And during his first term, he pulled out of the Iran Nuclear Deal and almost got us into a war with Iran. And he always bragged about being the “most pro-Israel president” in American history. And Israel has been wanting the U.S. to go to war against Iran for decades.It appears that the Warmonger-Neocrazy-War Profiteer coalition has AGAIN effectuated a Coup d' Etat against President Trump thereby dissolving the Mandate the WE THE PEOPLE gave to our Anti-War President
HUH?Israel declared itself independent
The President decided to give diplomacy a chance .There was no coup d’etat. Trump is as complicit in this as anybody. His rhetoric against Iran was always bellicose going all the way back to his 2016 campaign. And during his first term, he pulled out of the Iran Nuclear Deal and almost got us into a war with Iran. And he always bragged about being the “most pro-Israel president” in American history. And Israel has been wanting the U.S. to go to war against Iran for decades.
I’m just glad I didn’t vote for Trump. I believe in REAL America First, not a faux “America First” that actually puts Israel First.
Mark
IF it was in fact a "conspiracy theory " you would have easily refuted or rebutted the same by now. You haven't b/c you couldn't.It is quite easy to see that you are. Libertarian given the conspiracy nonsense in which you deal.
IF it was in fact a "conspiracy theory " you would have easily refuted or rebutted the same by now. You haven't b/c you couldn't.
That is just a pretext since you are unable or incapable of debating .Trying to rebut nonsense only makes the Libertarian in question post yet more nonsense.
Base on the evidence = 0How many WMDs has Iran given to terrorists?
That is just a pretext since you are unable or incapable of debating .
HUH?
Independence from whom?
Palestine was already independent - the Palestinians acquired their independence from the Ottoman Empire in 1917 . SO what are you talking about ?
"Because the UNGA’s resolutions are recommendations and not legally binding according to the UN Charter, the World accepted that the UNGA resolution 181 as a recommendation and not legally binding."
Base on the evidence = 0
Declared they were a country. The British Palestinian Mandate ended in 1948 and Israel declared themselves a nation.HUH?
Independence from whom?
Palestine was already independent - the Palestinians acquired their independence from the Ottoman Empire in 1917 . SO what are you talking about ?
HOW Can they declared themselves to be a country when there is already a country there?Declared they were a country
The CIA controls the Mockinbird Media aka the SEE BS Network - whenever they want to smear a country they give the propaganda to their TV stations for broadcastingExactly. So why should anyone believe they would gives nukes to terrorists?
Given the many due process issues concerning Palestine the only organ that should have ventilated the issue wasOne should also note that only Syria, on the Security Council, opposed it and both the US and Soviet Union voted for it.
Pretty obvious that while not made binding on the parties, it was the consensus of a strong majority of the world.
In other words ENGLISH COMPREHENSION IS NOT YOUR FORTE
"Because the UNGA’s resolutions >>>>>>>>are recommendations and not legally binding <<<<<<<according to the UN Charter, the World accepted that the UNGA resolution 181 as a recommendation and not legally binding."
ONLY the UN Security Council has the authority to issue legally binding declarations.
Israel has IGNORED UN RESOLUTIONS WHEN CONVENIENT TO DO SO
Palestinians did not acquire their independence from the Ottoman Empire in 1917
"During the First World War, Britain and its allies looked for support against Germany and its ally the Ottoman Empire. Since some Arab leaders at the time were seeking independence from Ottoman rule, Anglo-Arab collaboration was a natural outcome. Accordingly, understandings were reached in 1915 between the Sherif of Mecca acting as the spokesman for the Arabs, and Sir Henry McMahon, the British High Commissioner in Egypt who negotiated for the British. The Sherif demanded recognition of independence of all Ottoman Arab territories including Palestine. McMahon, however, tried to exclude Palestine through an ambiguous reference to the extent of the areas concerned. The Sherif rejected McMahon’s attempt."From everyone.
And no.
Palestinians did not acquire their independence from the Ottoman Empire in 1917
The British Egyptian Expeditionary Force, commanded by Edmund Allenby, captured Jerusalem on 9 December 1917 and occupied the whole of the Levant following the defeat of Turkish forces in Palestine at the Battle of Megiddo in September 1918 and the capitulation of Turkey on 31 October.
I don't think you are grasping the fact that there were 1.5 MILLION Palestinians residing in this area whose rights could not be disposed of willy nilly.I don't think you are grasping what others are saying.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?