I found this missive very interesting. I've never worked for the government
And therefore you find this op-ed piece by someone whose only employment has been as a senior official, compelling.
Since we don't know who this senior official is, it's possible that until they were hired by Trump, THEY TOO had "never worked for the government", as Trump seems to prefer picking sympathetic ideologues from the private sector who are interested in privatizing much or ALL of government.
In the meantime, you may want to go do a search of government services which are now or will eventually be impacted by the shutdown. If you believe that we don't need a Centers for Disease Control or any of the research done for them, or FDA food inspections, or TSA screenings, or the Department of Justice (yes, it too is closed) then obviously you have a different view of government than I do.
Carry on in your blissful ignorance, your confirmation bias is clear.
GOD FORBID that you might ever learn that some government is actually pretty efficient and also NECESSARY, it might ruin your day.
Must be great to be a leftist. Rules for thee, but not for me.There will be no negotiations with hostage takers. At this point, even people who weren't opposed to the idea of more wall building are deciding that Trump's injury to ordinary working people and the economy due to his hostage move is enough to harden their resistance, not soften it.
If we give in to hostage taking, we can expect more and bigger hostages. No way.
There will be NO WALL for Trump...EVER.
There will be no negotiations with hostage takers. At this point, even people who weren't opposed to the idea of more wall building are deciding that Trump's injury to ordinary working people and the economy due to his hostage move is enough to harden their resistance, not soften it.
If we give in to hostage taking, we can expect more and bigger hostages. No way.
There will be NO WALL for Trump...EVER.
There will be no negotiations with hostage takers. At this point, even people who weren't opposed to the idea of more wall building are deciding that Trump's injury to ordinary working people and the economy due to his hostage move is enough to harden their resistance, not soften it.
If we give in to hostage taking, we can expect more and bigger hostages. No way.
There will be NO WALL for Trump...EVER.
There will be no negotiations with hostage takers. At this point, even people who weren't opposed to the idea of more wall building are deciding that Trump's injury to ordinary working people and the economy due to his hostage move is enough to harden their resistance, not soften it.
If we give in to hostage taking, we can expect more and bigger hostages. No way.
There will be NO WALL for Trump...EVER.
Not just anonymous sources, but an anonymous opinion/editorial piece..........in a day or so you will be screaming about a cross-aisle anonymous source........
“The Daily Caller is taking the rare step of publishing this anonymous op-ed at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose career would be jeopardized by its disclosure.”
Must be great to be a leftist. Rules for thee, but not for me.
Is that why Obama released terrorists from Gitmo and flew a plane packed with money into Iran?
Interesting. I read another article a short time ago that talks about "government process". That article...and this one...compliment and support each other.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/01/14/systemic-shock/
I sincerely hope the anonymous op-ed writer gets his/her wish.
yeah last thing us dems want is to give trump money to protect our borders and our citizens. If we do that it may actually work. We cant have that. No its much better to let our citizens be murdered and our women raped over supporting our nations laws and borders.
Riiiiiiiiiight, because you know me so well. Remember that anonymous letter from within the WH about the adult in the room. You Trump haters ate that **** right up. This piece isn't making any false statements. It's putting forth thoughts which can inform people as they view the shutdown.
But, there, there blah blah blah soothing words.
I’m thinking this “senior official” trumps your “senior official,” as far as “knowing you,” all I have to go on is your 5200 posts, so yeah you are known here......
Of COURSE they work. Of COURSE democrats have supported them. Watching their hypocrisy now has just reached the point of hilarity.You've nailed it. We know walls work. The evidence is incontrovertible. We know Democrats supported walls/fences/border security and voted to fund it. Now, because it's Trump's border, they really don't want Trump to go touting how much the border he put everything on the line for actually worked.
They would rather import their dedicated dem-voting underclass in the form of illegal aliens than serve and protect Americans.
You seem to not understand that the victims of your 'resistance' are the very working people you claim to wish to help. But thats liberalism in a nutshell isnt it.
Must be great to be a leftist. Rules for thee, but not for me.
Is that why Obama released terrorists from Gitmo and flew a plane packed with money into Iran?
My impression is that the money was theirs. And of course the “terrorists” had not been charged, tried or convicted. Pesky thing, that Constitution. Trump should read it.
I dont know...I think the funniest part in all of this has been watching idiot leftists that have supported walls and fences for DECADES and cheered wildly while democrat presidents BUILT the ****ing things now stomping their feet like pathetic small minded children shrieking WALLS DONT DO NO GOOD!!!
As to the number of government workers...yes...we should review ALL government positions and it shouldnt take a shut down to do this. We should re-assess if we need redundant systems at the state and fed level and we should wherever possible return responsibility (and thus reduce tax burdens) to the states where those burdens belong. Some areas should actually be built up. Some should be reduced. Our system of contracting should be revised. All of it should be looked at including the DoD.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?