• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The FBI is reopening its Clinton email probe

Removable Mind said:
I have hatred for corruption, too.

Clinton is corrupt (pardon me, "Clintons"), and that to me is a no-brainer.

But Trump is far from exempt from laying out the claim that he too is corrupt, but just in a different way.

Power corrupts. They've both been in the "power game" for decades. As I said, we're ****ed either way, but we are forced to choose how we want to be ****ed.

The choice between these two is disgusting, in my humble opinion. It's absolutely horrid that these two are our presidential choices. The subtext to this reality is even more disgusting and horrid. Who the hell participated in getting these wack-jobs this far along to the seat of the most powerful political person on the frickin planet? Have we the people lost our ability to care (or have we ever cared) about whether or not we continue to select corrupt individuals to possess coveted seats in the Kingdom of Washington?

Hell, dunno. Maybe it's just not possible to elect a person that actually serve (not rule) in the White House who's competent and not corrupt?
Click to expand...

Clinton was elected by the democrats who voted for her in the primary.

Trump was elected by the republicans who voted for him in the primary.

To pretend otherwise is a fantasy.
 
iguanaman said:
Since the FBI has already leaked the fact that none the emails are from OR to Hillary, I'de say your speculations about Hillary are all false.



Hillary Clinton's Emails: The Real Reason the FBI Is Reviewing More of Them
Click to expand...

You keep posting that link for some reason.

34 % of voters less likely to vote for Clinton after new Email relevations....
https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/30/new-poll-34-percent-less-likely-to-vote-for-clinton-after-new-email-revelations.amp.html?client=ms-android-hms-tmobile-us
 
Gimmesometruth said:
I keep showing you and anyone else who has a concern about the matter that the courts have understood that 18usc793 is all about intent, the FBI director doesn't have the ability to travel back in time and change that....or any other "re-writing".
Click to expand...

Absolutely irrelevant. This never made it to court because Comey was playing games with the law. The law does not require intent. Zero intent. Not even a smidgen. I don't know of many laws that can send you to jail, except if you claim there is no intent. Then, you get off Scott free.
 
Removable Mind said:
I have hatred for corruption, too.

Clinton is corrupt (pardon me, "Clintons"), and that to me is a no-brainer.

But Trump is far from exempt from laying out the claim that he too is corrupt, but just in a different way.

Power corrupts. They've both been in the "power game" for decades. As I said, we're ****ed either way, but we are forced to choose how we want to be ****ed.

The choice between these two is disgusting, in my humble opinion. It's absolutely horrid that these two are our presidential choices. The subtext to this reality is even more disgusting and horrid. Who the hell participated in getting these wack-jobs this far along to the seat of the most powerful political person on the frickin planet? Have we the people lost our ability to care (or have we ever cared) about whether or not we continue to select corrupt individuals to possess coveted seats in the Kingdom of Washington?

Hell, dunno. Maybe it's just not possible to elect a person that actually serves (not rules) in the White House who's competent and not corrupt?
Click to expand...

I am always amused at those that claim Hilary's nomination was a shock and "how did this happen?". The lack of even a shred of memory that goes back more than a few years is the only explanation I can give. For your information, Hillary actually ran for President in 2008 and was quite successful although she lost the nomination to Obama. She did not disappear after her defeat and went on to become SOS as well as being involved in various Democratic party functions. It was a foregone conclusion that she would run after Obama's terms were finished and she did.
 
poweRob said:
No she wouldn't. That's just your wishful thinking overriding the logic portion of your brain.
Click to expand...

Like it or not...there are Americans sitting in prison for committing a fraction of the violations that Hillary has committed. And I am quite certain that if Hillary had an "R" in front of her name on the ballot instead of "D", you would in total agreement and demanding Hillary be indicted. You are not fooling anyone.
 
iguanaman said:
I am always amused at those that claim Hilary's nomination was a shock and "how did this happen?". The lack of even a shred of memory that goes back more than a few years is the only explanation I can give. For your information, Hillary actually ran for President in 2008 and was quite successful although she lost the nomination to Obama. She did not disappear after her defeat and went on to become SOS as well as being involved in various Democratic party functions. It was a foregone conclusion that she would run after Obama's terms were finished and she did.
Click to expand...

And people who haven't learned anything are also still here.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
Clinton was elected by the democrats who voted for her in the primary.

Trump was elected by the republicans who voted for him in the primary.

To pretend otherwise is a fantasy.
Click to expand...

I understand completely. Did you fail to understand my criticism? Let me make it little more clear. In other words, supporters for either of these nimrods ****ed up royally. What the hell were they thinking? Where's the self-interests involved in the selection of these two asswipes?

By Removeable Mind:

The choice between these two is disgusting, in my humble opinion. It's absolutely horrid that these two are our presidential choices. The subtext to this reality is even more disgusting and horrid. Who the hell participated in getting these wack-jobs this far along to the seat of the most powerful political person on the frickin planet? Have we the people lost our ability to care (or have we ever cared) about whether or not we continue to select corrupt individuals to possess coveted seats in the Kingdom of Washington?
Click to expand...
 
Mustachio said:
You definitely didn't read the article you linked to. It clearly states that there has been no evidence that classified information has been found. It says "emails that might be relevant to the investigation." In internet language: I don't think those words mean what you think they mean. Or, in this case, wish they'd mean.
Click to expand...

If they're, "relevant to the investigation", of Clinton's illegal server means it's ahout classified emails. It ain't rocket science.
 
Removable Mind said:
I understand completely. Did you fail to understand my criticism? Let me make it little more clear. In other words, supporters for either of these nimrods ****ed up royally. What the hell were they thinking? Where's the self-interests involved in the selection of these two asswipes?
Click to expand...

You would have to ask that question to everyone who voted for the two canididates in the primary.
 
Fenton said:
You keep posting that link for some reason.

34 % of voters less likely to vote for Clinton after new Email relevations....
https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/30/new-poll-34-percent-less-likely-to-vote-for-clinton-after-new-email-revelations.amp.html?client=ms-android-hms-tmobile-us
Click to expand...

You keep posting links from fox news for some odd reason like some of us care about what they make up. It does make what Comey did even more unseemly though. Is that what you are trying to portray?
 
Anthony60 said:
Absolutely irrelevant. This never made it to court because Comey was playing games with the law. The law does not require intent. Zero intent. Not even a smidgen. I don't know of many laws that can send you to jail, except if you claim there is no intent. Then, you get off Scott free.
Click to expand...
You keep displaying an ignorance of the law, its previous use, the interpretations and applications by the courts......even after you have been provided all of the findings of the courts and current understanding of the use of the law. I can't help your willful, self induced ignorance. Yer on yer own. Yer just flat out wrong on intent, it has been central in federal cases.


Why Intent, Not Gross Negligence, is the Standard in Clinton Case
 
ObamacareFail said:
Not to mention...Hillary is an attorney and is well aware that Comey cannot legally what was discovered until the investigation is completed.
Click to expand...

Then he should have kept his damn mouth shut rather to tip the scales in a close election basically telling the people he may have a smoking gun under his suit jacket ..... or it just be me a smoking bag of crap.
 
upsideguy said:
Because the alternative is incapable of doing the job. He brings almost no positive attributes to the table and negative attributes too numerous to list (include every negative attribute that people wish to ascribe to Hillary). As such, the alternative is a bigger threat to America and Americans than ISIL.

Moreover, nothing has really changed since last week. This whole thing on Friday is much to do about nothing.
Click to expand...

What happened Friday effectively handed Trump the victory.

Deny the obvious all you want but Hillary is going to be indicted. Watch and see.
 
Jack Fabulous said:
What happened Friday effectively handed Trump the victory.

Deny the obvious all you want but Hillary is going to be indicted. Watch and see.
Click to expand...

I don't think so...

The polarization of this country is so total that it will not cost Hilliary much support. The numbers are already baked in.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
You would have to ask that question to everyone who voted for the two candidates in the primary.
Click to expand...

Yes, so true. But at this point in time, I wouldn't want to own up to selecting either of these disgraces. So I'm not so sure that I'd get as many honest answers required to established anything statically significant. There's just a hell of a lot of "whys" running around in my head about these two landing in the nominee spots.
 
Removable Mind said:
I have hatred for corruption, too.

Clinton is corrupt (pardon me, "Clintons"), and that to me is a no-brainer.

But Trump is far from exempt from laying out the claim that he too is corrupt, but just in a different way.

Power corrupts. They've both been in the "power game" for decades. As I said, we're ****ed either way, but we are forced to choose how we want to be ****ed.

The choice between these two is disgusting, in my humble opinion. It's absolutely horrid that these two are our presidential choices. The subtext to this reality is even more disgusting and horrid. Who the hell participated in getting these wack-jobs this far along to the seat of the most powerful political person on the frickin planet? Have we the people lost our ability to care (or have we ever cared) about whether or not we continue to select corrupt individuals to possess coveted seats in the Kingdom of Washington?

Hell, dunno. Maybe it's just not possible to elect a person that actually serves (not rules) in the White House who's competent and not corrupt?
Click to expand...

It's sad that this is the best two people that we could come up with.
 
iguanaman said:
Since the FBI has already leaked the fact that none the emails are from OR to Hillary, I'de say your speculations about Hillary are all false.



Hillary Clinton's Emails: The Real Reason the FBI Is Reviewing More of Them
Click to expand...

I read your link and it was pretty much opinion. I tried to find where it stated that the FBI leaked anything but couldn't.

I just looked again and the article is by Kurt Eichenwald, who was wrong as soon as Chavetz made his statement. Eichenwald went on a toreent stating that the whole thing was a sham because it only involved three emails and it turned out to be thousands. That is comparable to quoting David Brock form Media Matters. It didn't say much more than I did.

So, exactly what was leaked and by whom? (include a link) The FBI sent a letter to Chavetz and Chavetz made the letter public. Was this supposed to be a secret? I ahve seen some information that has been "leaked" form the NYPD but it has nothing to do with Comey's conspiracy to sink the Democratic party.
 
NonoBadDog said:
I read your link and it was pretty much opinion. I tried to find where it stated that the FBI leaked anything but couldn't.

I just looked again and the article is by Kurt Eichenwald, who was wrong as soon as Chavetz made his statement. Eichenwald went on a toreent stating that the whole thing was a sham because it only involved three emails and it turned out to be thousands. That is comparable to quoting David Brock form Media Matters. It didn't say much more than I did.

So, exactly what was leaked and by whom? (include a link) The FBI sent a letter to Chavetz and Chavetz made the letter public. Was this supposed to be a secret? I ahve seen some information that has been "leaked" form the NYPD but it has nothing to do with Comey's conspiracy to sink the Democratic party.
Click to expand...

Those leaks came from the FBI, many of them are steaming mad at Comey for his incompetence. Wait until tommorrow...

https://twitter.com/kurteichenwald/status/792236210924118017?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Here is a "fixed" version of Comey's letter I found.

Cv-yq_WUsAAIjpw.jpg
 
Last edited:
iguanaman said:
Those leaks came from the FBI, many of them are steaming mad at Comey for his incompetence. Wait until tommorrow...

https://twitter.com/kurteichenwald/status/792236210924118017?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Here is a "fixed" version of Comey's letter I found.

Cv-yq_WUsAAIjpw.jpg
Click to expand...

You and another poster keep posting that spam.


Hey, why doesn't Hillary just order Huma to go out and give a press conference ?

Answer all these questions like " Whats in those Emails ? " " Was there any classified material in them ? " " Why didn't you turn them over to the FBI " etc

Hillary could put this thing to rest, prove its a big nothing burger so whats stopping her ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom