The Farce Of Fossil Fuels.

[plantpower]

The use of fossil fuels has basically been a joke since 1913. When the first nuclear powered battery technology came into being. It has only improved ever since. Now the Chinese are getting ready to put out a very small nuclear powered battery. I'll post a website about it. Keep in mind that anything that can be built on a very small scale can also be built on a very large scale. Here is the article.


World Nuclear News
world-nuclear-news.org › Articles › Nuclear-battery-Chinese-firm-aiming-for-mass-mark
Nuclear battery: Chinese firm aiming for mass market production - World Nuclear News

Not only can these batteries last for a very long time, but they can even be made using radioactive waste. Here is an article about that.


Indiatimes
indiatimes.com › home › technology › news
New Diamond Battery Will Last 28,000 Years, Powered By Nuclear Waste


The only reason why we are using fossil fuels at all is because very wealthy people who have basically made themselves gods are making a LOT of money from it. It is apparently important anywhere. Such as in places like Russia. This next part is delving into the conspiracy theory arena, but there was a scientist in Russia named Demitri Petronov who supposedly came up with a plasma battery that powered his house for 14 months. He went missing. His body was later discovered in the Volga River missing his hands and teeth. There are many such stories out there. Given the apparent power of the fossil fuel industry, more likely than not, they are probably true.

Just think of it, with nuclear powered batteries being a reality and having been around for a long time, using nuclear power plants is a waste of time. That means that Chernobyl and Fukushima need not have happened. It seems to me that the only reason why we use nuclear reactors to create electricity is because it is difficult to do. Whereas burning fossil fuels is "cheap" and easy. This also means that creating dams to generate electricity was unnecessary. It also means that photovoltaic solar panels and huge wind turbines are also unnecessary. But with the last two, they aren't as reliable as just burning fossil fuels is.

You know, it is amazing to me just how easily people can be brainwashed. The overt brainwashing they do is bad enough. But the subliminal kind is sublimely evil. And remarkably easy to do. You don't need any sort of extraterrestrial technology to do it as in the movie, "They Live!" Just take a look at this picture of some well dressed people walking down a street. Squint your eyes at the photo. Or look at it from a distance. For the word you will see, you should do just the opposite. Because what those people are doing isn't in your best interest, obviously.

 

[Exquisitor]

The use of fossil fuels has basically been a joke since 1913. When the first nuclear powered battery technology came into being. It has only improved ever since. Now the Chinese are getting ready to put out a very small nuclear powered battery. I'll post a website about it. Keep in mind that anything that can be built on a very small scale can also be built on a very large scale. Here is the article.


World Nuclear News
world-nuclear-news.org › Articles › Nuclear-battery-Chinese-firm-aiming-for-mass-mark
Nuclear battery: Chinese firm aiming for mass market production - World Nuclear News

Not only can these batteries last for a very long time, but they can even be made using radioactive waste. Here is an article about that.


Indiatimes
indiatimes.com › home › technology › news
New Diamond Battery Will Last 28,000 Years, Powered By Nuclear Waste


The only reason why we are using fossil fuels at all is because very wealthy people who have basically made themselves gods are making a LOT of money from it. It is apparently important anywhere. Such as in places like Russia. This next part is delving into the conspiracy theory arena, but there was a scientist in Russia named Demitri Petronov who supposedly came up with a plasma battery that powered his house for 14 months. He went missing. His body was later discovered in the Volga River missing his hands and teeth. There are many such stories out there. Given the apparent power of the fossil fuel industry, more likely than not, they are probably true.

Just think of it, with nuclear powered batteries being a reality and having been around for a long time, using nuclear power plants is a waste of time. That means that Chernobyl and Fukushima need not have happened. It seems to me that the only reason why we use nuclear reactors to create electricity is because it is difficult to do. Whereas burning fossil fuels is "cheap" and easy. This also means that creating dams to generate electricity was unnecessary. It also means that photovoltaic solar panels and huge wind turbines are also unnecessary. But with the last two, they aren't as reliable as just burning fossil fuels is.

You know, it is amazing to me just how easily people can be brainwashed. The overt brainwashing they do is bad enough. But the subliminal kind is sublimely evil. And remarkably easy to do. You don't need any sort of extraterrestrial technology to do it as in the movie, "They Live!" Just take a look at this picture of some well dressed people walking down a street. Squint your eyes at the photo. Or look at it from a distance. For the word you will see, you should do just the opposite. Because what those people are doing isn't in your best interest, obviously.

View attachment 67537337

Sounds like CT.

Only one nickel isotope is used, doesn't use up much nuclear waste.

Yes, we should become oil independent before she runs out.

 

[phoenix2020]

The use of fossil fuels has basically been a joke since 1913. When the first nuclear powered battery technology came into being. It has only improved ever since. Now the Chinese are getting ready to put out a very small nuclear powered battery. I'll post a website about it. Keep in mind that anything that can be built on a very small scale can also be built on a very large scale. Here is the article.


World Nuclear News
world-nuclear-news.org › Articles › Nuclear-battery-Chinese-firm-aiming-for-mass-mark
Nuclear battery: Chinese firm aiming for mass market production - World Nuclear News

Not only can these batteries last for a very long time, but they can even be made using radioactive waste. Here is an article about that.


Indiatimes
indiatimes.com › home › technology › news
New Diamond Battery Will Last 28,000 Years, Powered By Nuclear Waste


The only reason why we are using fossil fuels at all is because very wealthy people who have basically made themselves gods are making a LOT of money from it. It is apparently important anywhere. Such as in places like Russia. This next part is delving into the conspiracy theory arena, but there was a scientist in Russia named Demitri Petronov who supposedly came up with a plasma battery that powered his house for 14 months. He went missing. His body was later discovered in the Volga River missing his hands and teeth. There are many such stories out there. Given the apparent power of the fossil fuel industry, more likely than not, they are probably true.

Just think of it, with nuclear powered batteries being a reality and having been around for a long time, using nuclear power plants is a waste of time. That means that Chernobyl and Fukushima need not have happened. It seems to me that the only reason why we use nuclear reactors to create electricity is because it is difficult to do. Whereas burning fossil fuels is "cheap" and easy. This also means that creating dams to generate electricity was unnecessary. It also means that photovoltaic solar panels and huge wind turbines are also unnecessary. But with the last two, they aren't as reliable as just burning fossil fuels is.

You know, it is amazing to me just how easily people can be brainwashed. The overt brainwashing they do is bad enough. But the subliminal kind is sublimely evil. And remarkably easy to do. You don't need any sort of extraterrestrial technology to do it as in the movie, "They Live!" Just take a look at this picture of some well dressed people walking down a street. Squint your eyes at the photo. Or look at it from a distance. For the word you will see, you should do just the opposite. Because what those people are doing isn't in your best interest, obviously.

View attachment 67537337

Once you’re in high school, I suggest a basic class on electronics in order to actually understand the capability of the “nuclear battery.”

 

[plantpower]

Sounds like CT.

Only one nickel isotope is used, doesn't use up much nuclear waste.

Yes, we should become oil independent before she runs out.

What is "CT." Also, what is the last sentence supposed to mean. We should become fossil fuel independent before anything "runs out."

 

[plantpower]

Once you’re in high school, I suggest a basic class on electronics in order to actually understand the capability of the “nuclear battery.”

I said that anything that can be built on a very small scale can also be built on a very large scale. Such as nuclear batteries. What is it about that statement that you disagree with. Maybe once you make it to grade school you can tell me. Though I do see one problem with nuclear batteries. They are always putting out power. Whether you need it or not.

 

[coyote505]

I said that anything that can be built on a very small scale can also be built on a very large scale. Such as nuclear batteries. What is it about that statement that you disagree with. Maybe once you make it to grade school you can tell me. Though I do see one problem with nuclear batteries. They are always putting out power. Whether you need it or not.

Haiti has been using wood in place of oil for some time now. The entire island is now deforested and subject to catastrophic flooding. Is that the Plant Power you support?

The plain fact is that we have Too Damn Many People on the Earth to meet our energy needs with biomass. Solar? Maybe, if costs come down. Wind? In appropriate places, although no one seems to think their own back yard is an appropriate place.

Best thing you can do for greenitude is to get Africans and Arabs to quit breeding so fast.

 

[Noodlegawd]

The use of fossil fuels has basically been a joke since 1913. When the first nuclear powered battery technology came into being.

Who needs nuclear batteries when we have perpetual motion machines.

 

[plantpower]

Haiti has been using wood in place of oil for some time now. The entire island is now deforested and subject to catastrophic flooding. Is that the Plant Power you support?

The plain fact is that we have Too Damn Many People on the Earth to meet our energy needs with biomass. Solar? Maybe, if costs come down. Wind? In appropriate places, although no one seems to think their own back yard is an appropriate place.

Best thing you can do for greenitude is to get Africans and Arabs to quit breeding so fast.

Of course that's not the kind of plant power I support. As for the rest, bacteria multiply. There is no stopping it. And humans are basically "thinking" bacteria. It is what we are wired to do. It is what we were evolved to do. I have a strong suspicion that if you don't breed, your mind will punish you. That is probably why the Romans viewed having sex as a healthy practice. But all this is getting away from the topic of this thread. Which is nuclear powered batteries. They are and have been a reality for a long time. Having the ability to make them makes getting electricity from fossil fuels or any other source of energy obsolete. It is a damning indictment against humanity and the fiendish power of greed that we should have been producing electricity by any other means.

 

[Exquisitor]

What is "CT." Also, what is the last sentence supposed to mean. We should become fossil fuel independent before anything "runs out."

Conspiracy Theories.

Yes, we should transition before we run out, save the rest of the oil for something else.

 

[phoenix2020]

I said that anything that can be built on a very small scale can also be built on a very large scale.

Untrue, as you'll discover in high school.

Such as nuclear batteries. What is it about that statement that you disagree with.

Everything about it. Don't get me wrong, it has a certain 5th grade charm.

Maybe once you make it to grade school you can tell me. Though I do see one problem with nuclear batteries. They are always putting out power. Whether you need it or not.

Tell me you don't understand anything about p-n junctions without saying anything about p-n junctions.

Oh wait, you just did.

 

[plantpower]

Conspiracy Theories.

Yes, we should transition before we run out, save the rest of the oil for something else.

Ah, conspiracy theories. Did you not look at the websites I posted? Nuclear batteries are a reality. Not a conspiracy. And from what I have seen, building them that small presents some real challenges. But apparently not too challenging. Because it has been done. Also, with nuclear batteries having been around for a very long time, using other means to produce electricity is indeed a farce. Not a "CT."

 

[plantpower]

Untrue, as you'll discover in high school.

Everything about it. Don't get me wrong, it has a certain 5th grade charm.

Tell me you don't understand anything about p-n junctions without saying anything about p-n junctions.

Oh wait, you just did.

As far as I could find out, a nuclear battery can only be built to a moderate size. But keep in mind, that comes through the same sort of societal filter that has us using fossil fuels. Including forums like this. Apparently a major challenge hasn't been on how large they can be built, but how small they can be built. And that challenge has apparently been overcome.

Now "brainiac," go to the website I posted a link to. Scroll down the page until you see the picture shown as Figure 3. It shows both a wind generator and a solar panel array. It also shows an approximate area highlighted by a green rectangle as to what the size of a nuclear battery array would be in comparison to the other two to create the same amount of electricity. Now, in whatever form that green rectangle would be, tell me that more than one couldn't be built. Or that in doing so, they couldn't be stackable as independent units. Hence, anything built on a very small scale can also be built on a very large scale.



MDPI
mdpi.com › 1996-1073 › 14 › 14 › 4385

Can Nuclear Batteries Be Economically Competitive in Large Markets?

 

[phoenix2020]

As far as I could find out, a nuclear battery can only be built to a moderate size. But keep in mind, that comes through the same sort of societal filter that has us using fossil fuels. Including forums like this. Apparently a major challenge hasn't been on how large they can be built, but how small they can be built. And that challenge has apparently been overcome.

Now "brainiac," go to the website I posted a link to. Scroll down the page until you see the picture shown as Figure 3. It shows both a wind generator and a solar panel array. It also shows an approximate area highlighted by a green rectangle as to what the size of a nuclear battery array would be in comparison to the other two to create the same amount of electricity. Now, in whatever form that green rectangle would be, tell me that more than one couldn't be built. Or that in doing so, they couldn't be stackable as independent units. Hence, anything built on a very small scale can also be built on a very large scale.


MDPI
mdpi.com › 1996-1073 › 14 › 14 › 4385
Can Nuclear Batteries Be Economically Competitive in Large Markets?

First "brainiac" please demonstrate that you understand the difference between energy and power. Once you've gotten past 10th grade elementary electronics, we can discuss further.

 

[PoS]

The use of fossil fuels has basically been a joke since 1913.

 

[Exquisitor]

Ah, conspiracy theories. Did you not look at the websites I posted? Nuclear batteries are a reality. Not a conspiracy. And from what I have seen, building them that small presents some real challenges. But apparently not too challenging. Because it has been done. Also, with nuclear batteries having been around for a very long time, using other means to produce electricity is indeed a farce. Not a "CT."

Ya, but where do you get enough nickel-86?

So your proposal is bunk, there is no way to get to scale.

 

[Exquisitor]

Ah, conspiracy theories. Did you not look at the websites I posted? Nuclear batteries are a reality. Not a conspiracy. And from what I have seen, building them that small presents some real challenges. But apparently not too challenging. Because it has been done. Also, with nuclear batteries having been around for a very long time, using other means to produce electricity is indeed a farce. Not a "CT."

Here's another and a discussion:

China unveils the ultimate battery: 50 years without recharge, but with dangerous energy

China has developed a new battery that can run for 50 years without recharging, but the kind of energy it utilizes comes with risks to people's health.

www.eldiario24.com

China unveils nuclear battery that could last 50 years.

https://www.eldiario24.com/en/energy-china-battery-smartphone-years/1358/ The concept is not that farfetched after Chinese company Betavolt developed a battery the size of a coin that runs on nuclear energy and lasts for an incredible five decades. The technology is also applicable to drones...

debatepolitics.com

The article is also bunk, because how does nickel decay into copper?

Bunk, bunk story, fake, fake news.

Take it, take it, hook line and sinker.

Has become very probable.

 

[Exquisitor]

Ah, conspiracy theories. Did you not look at the websites I posted? Nuclear batteries are a reality. Not a conspiracy. And from what I have seen, building them that small presents some real challenges. But apparently not too challenging. Because it has been done. Also, with nuclear batteries having been around for a very long time, using other means to produce electricity is indeed a farce. Not a "CT."

OK, I'm wrong:

Nickel-63 is a radioisotope of the chemical element Nickel, which, in addition to the element-specific 28 protons, has 35 neutrons in the atomic nucleus, resulting in the mass number 63. The atomic nucleus decays to the stable isotope copper-63 with a half-life of 101.2 years.

A neutron changes to a proton.

 

[plantpower]

First "brainiac" please demonstrate that you understand the difference between energy and power. Once you've gotten past 10th grade elementary electronics, we can discuss further.

I wonder how in the hell that MDPI mdpi.com thing with the unlocked lock icon above it got posted into my reply. I didn't put it there. The link I posted says "Can Nuclear Batteries Be Economically Competitive in Large Markets." It is by clicking on that one that brings you to the website that in Figure 3 it shows a large wind generator, a solar panel array and a rectangle highlighted in a green line compared to the other two of a nuclear battery array it would take to make the same amount of electricity as the other two. I wonder who the asshole is that put the other one in there.

Next, clearly you are a troll. Answer me this, troll. What causes your cell phone to work. Energy or power. Or what makes a flashlight work. Energy or power. Though, in fact, I don't want you to answer that. You apparently have some sort of bug up your ass concerning nuclear batteries. Which is causing you to act like a troll and question my intelligence. So don't reply to me again. If you do, I'll put you on ignore. Then I at least won't have to look at whatever BS you may have to spout. So I won't say goodbye. I'll say badbye.

 

[plantpower]

Ya, but where do you get enough nickel-86?

So your proposal is bunk, there is no way to get to scale.

By producing nuclear weapons, you can come up with all sorts of nuclear waste. And due to nuclear reactors, we have plenty of other sources of radiation. Such as in spent fuel rods. All you need to make a nuclear battery work is anything that is radioactive. So your argument is bunk.

 

[phoenix2020]

I wonder how in the hell that MDPI mdpi.com thing with the unlocked lock icon above it got posted into my reply. I didn't put it there. The link I posted says "Can Nuclear Batteries Be Economically Competitive in Large Markets." It is by clicking on that one that brings you to the website that in Figure 3 it shows a large wind generator, a solar panel array and a rectangle highlighted in a green line compared to the other two of a nuclear battery array it would take to make the same amount of electricity as the other two. I wonder who the asshole is that put the other one in there.

Next, clearly you are a troll. Answer me this, troll. What causes your cell phone to work. Energy or power. Or what makes a flashlight work. Energy or power. Though, in fact, I don't want you to answer that. You apparently have some sort of bug up your ass concerning nuclear batteries. Which is causing you to act like a troll and question my intelligence. So don't reply to me again. If you do, I'll put you on ignore. Then I at least won't have to look at whatever BS you may have to spout. So I won't say goodbye. I'll say badbye.

Badbye.

 

[multivita-man]

I said that anything that can be built on a very small scale can also be built on a very large scale. Such as nuclear batteries. What is it about that statement that you disagree with. Maybe once you make it to grade school you can tell me. Though I do see one problem with nuclear batteries. They are always putting out power. Whether you need it or not.

nm

 

[plantpower]

Here's another and a discussion:

China unveils the ultimate battery: 50 years without recharge, but with dangerous energy

China has developed a new battery that can run for 50 years without recharging, but the kind of energy it utilizes comes with risks to people's health.

www.eldiario24.com

China unveils nuclear battery that could last 50 years.

https://www.eldiario24.com/en/energy-china-battery-smartphone-years/1358/ The concept is not that farfetched after Chinese company Betavolt developed a battery the size of a coin that runs on nuclear energy and lasts for an incredible five decades. The technology is also applicable to drones...

debatepolitics.com

The article is also bunk, because how does nickel decay into copper?

Bunk, bunk story, fake, fake news.

Take it, take it, hook line and sinker.

Has become very probable.

I just looked it up. Nickle-63 decays into a more stable copper-63.

 

[Exquisitor]

By producing nuclear weapons, you can come up with all sorts of nuclear waste. And due to nuclear reactors, we have plenty of other sources of radiation. Such as in spent fuel rods. All you need to make a nuclear battery work is anything that is radioactive. So your argument is bunk.

No, you need nickel, nickle-63 and that is not the most common element in nuclear waste.

No, at most, even if you could use it all to make some kind of battery, you would only have found a use for nuclear waste, not a significant contribution to energy production.

 

[plantpower]

No, you need nickel, nickle-63 and that is not the most common element in nuclear waste.

No, at most, even if you could use it all to make some kind of battery, you would only have found a use for nuclear waste, not a significant contribution to energy production.

In the thread I posted, did you look at the second website I posted? Where it talked about making a nuclear battery that could last 28,000 years using nuclear waste? It talked about using isotopes found in nuclear waste. It doesn't mention what kind of isotopes. Though to me it shouldn't really matter. Anything that is radioactive should work as well. Also, I will tell you the same thing I told phoenix. Look at the link I will post. In it go down to the pictures in Figure 3. It shows a large wind turbine and a solar panel array. It also shows a green rectangle that gives the size that a nuclear battery array would be to create as much electricity as the other two. And what if you had a bunch of those. That looks to be far more than significant.


Can Nuclear Batteries Be Economically Competitive in Large Markets?

 

[Revelation]

Conspiracy Theories.

Yes, we should transition before we run out, save the rest of the oil for something else.

abiotic oil theory says the earth produces it's own oil; oil is the most abundant substance on earth we are in need of, God made it that way for all of us. stop believing the oil companies that we are running out. we are not.

and what happened to the safe Thorium nuclear reactors, tooo safe huh? can't have that, and guess which Alphabet agency stopped safe thorium nuclear reactor tech ??


guess they like their Armageddon scenarios being played out.